A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Russians delay launch of new booster



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 31st 04, 09:10 PM
Revision
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Russians delay launch of new booster

Space Launch Delay

MOSCOW (Reuters) -- The military has postponed the launch of a
new-generation space booster rocket scheduled for this week due to "a
software malfunction," the Defense Ministry said Thursday.

The Soyuz-M2 booster was scheduled to lift off from the Plesetsk
Cosmodrome in the Far North on Friday in a step toward bringing most
launches onto Russian territory.



  #2  
Old November 1st 04, 08:31 AM
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Revision wrote:

Space Launch Delay

MOSCOW (Reuters) -- The military has postponed the launch of a
new-generation space booster rocket scheduled for this week due to "a
software malfunction," the Defense Ministry said Thursday.


Does anyone have details on what differentiates the "Soyuz 2" from the
standard Soyuz booster?

Pat

  #3  
Old November 1st 04, 09:12 AM
Damon Hill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Pat Flannery wrote in
:



Revision wrote:

Space Launch Delay

MOSCOW (Reuters) -- The military has postponed the launch of a
new-generation space booster rocket scheduled for this week due to "a
software malfunction," the Defense Ministry said Thursday.


Does anyone have details on what differentiates the "Soyuz 2" from the
standard Soyuz booster?


About all I've been able to figure out is that it
uses a modern digital electronics guidance system.
Straps-ons, core and maybe the second stage are
mostly the same. Some sources suggest there are
improvements in the propulsion technology, but I can't
find anything that's specific. It's even hard to
guess version they're really talking about, but I
think this is it:

http://www.starsem.com/soyuz/soyuzst.htm

That and a wider payload fairing.

There were proposed changes in the core/booster engines to
a more advanced staged-combustion design, and even a
cryogenic upper stage, but these haven't been implemented
or haven't gone into design.

Old Number 7 just keeps soldering along...coming up
on its fiftieth birthday.

--Damon

  #4  
Old November 1st 04, 12:08 PM
Alan Erskine
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Pat Flannery" wrote in message
...

Does anyone have details on what differentiates the "Soyuz 2" from the
standard Soyuz booster?


Check EA - probably something there.


--
Alan Erskine
We can get people to the Moon in five years,
not the fifteen GWB proposes.
Give NASA a real challenge



  #5  
Old November 1st 04, 12:09 PM
Alan Erskine
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Damon Hill" wrote in message
4...

Old Number 7 just keeps soldering along...coming up
on its fiftieth birthday.


Why not? It's the most reliable LV in the world by far, it doesn't simply
"keep soldiering along"; it's _got no choice_ until there is a better
vehicle and that's a long way off.


--
Alan Erskine
We can get people to the Moon in five years,
not the fifteen GWB proposes.
Give NASA a real challenge



  #6  
Old November 2nd 04, 07:43 AM
Gunter Krebs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Soyuz-2-1A, which is to launch soon has a new guidance system, a new 4
meter payload fairing and a changed oxidezer-fuel ratio for the 3rd stage.
Otherwise it is like the Soyuz-FG
The Soyuz-2-1B to be launched in 2006 will introduce a new engine for stage
3.
The Soyuz/ST will feature a Ariane-4 payload fairing, otherwise as the 2-1B
version

Gunter Krebs
http://space.skyrocket.de


"Pat Flannery" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...


Revision wrote:

Space Launch Delay

MOSCOW (Reuters) -- The military has postponed the launch of a
new-generation space booster rocket scheduled for this week due to "a
software malfunction," the Defense Ministry said Thursday.


Does anyone have details on what differentiates the "Soyuz 2" from the
standard Soyuz booster?

Pat



  #7  
Old November 2nd 04, 03:29 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It is one of the world's most reliable launch vehicles, but I'm
not sure it is *the* most reliable among active launchers.
Tsylkon 2 (soon to be retired), STS, and Delta 2 all have
slightly better predicted reliability (both in realized results
and in predicted reliability) than Soyuz-U.

The numbers for the top four most reliable active launchers
break down as follows, as of October 31, 2004.

Vehicle Launches Realzd Pred Consc. Last
(Failures) Rate Rate* Succes Fail
----------------------------------------------------------
Tsyklon 2 104(1) .99 .98 91 4/25/73
Delta 2 115(2) .98 .97 60 1/17/97
STS 113(2) .98 .97 0 2/1/03
Soyuz-U 716(20) .97 .97 13 10/15/02
----------------------------------------------------------
* First level Bayesian estimate of mean predicted probability
of success for next launch attempt (k+1)/(n+2) where k is the
number of successful events and n is the number of trials.

- Ed Kyle

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space Calendar - August 27, 2004 Ron Misc 14 August 30th 04 11:09 PM
Space Calendar - June 25, 2004 Ron Astronomy Misc 0 June 25th 04 04:37 PM
Space Calendar - February 27, 2004 Ron History 0 February 27th 04 03:40 PM
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 Ron Baalke Astronomy Misc 1 November 28th 03 09:21 AM
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 Ron Baalke Astronomy Misc 0 October 24th 03 04:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.