|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
...Lesson for Nasa! US Airmail and Aviation
Besides, I'm not talking about the foreseeable future. I'm talking about the future. Ultimately, say a century or two down the road, where will our energy come from? Solar power is the obvious conclusion. So the oil has run out - where do we get our energy? Wind power, tidal power, geothermal power, Earth-based solar power, and fission reactors (more of which are being built right now) are all far more cost-effective than anything that has to be launched into space, maintained in space, replaced in space when it wears out, etc. etc. Waste vegetation can be turned into fuel fairly easily, too (which is a kind of solar energy, really). The combination of all these Earth-based approaches will keep the price of power down way below any motivation to get power from space. You're looking at this backward - starting with the assumption that we will go into space, then trying to justify it |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
...Lesson for Nasa! US Airmail and Aviation
wrote in message oups.com... Besides, I'm not talking about the foreseeable future. I'm talking about the future. Ultimately, say a century or two down the road, where will our energy come from? Solar power is the obvious conclusion. So the oil has run out - where do we get our energy? Wind power, tidal power, geothermal power, Earth-based solar power, and fission reactors (more of which are being built right now) are all far more cost-effective than anything that has to be launched into space, maintained in space, replaced in space when it wears out, etc. etc. Waste vegetation can be turned into fuel fairly easily, too (which is a kind of solar energy, really). The combination of all these Earth-based approaches will keep the price of power down way below any motivation to get power from space. You're forgetting about the rest of the world that doesn't live in a western-like economy. China is growing at ten percent a year. Indonesia, India and the Asian tigers are having explosive growth. Now these countries have very little industrialization. When the rest of the world becomes as industrialized and energy hungry as we are, they will be pump this planet dry. And all the while using very little pollution controls. You're looking at this backward - starting with the assumption that we will go into space, then trying to justify it No, you have it backwards. All things being equal, the simplist explanation or solution is generally the best one. Small steps do not lead to great accomplishments. As the insignificance of each step fails to inspire the next one. And is swept away by the next issue that comes along. A /large goal/ inspires and initiates those countless small steps in pursuit of the long term dream. As the large goal has magnificent benefits and countless justifications. One approach fails, the other succeeds. An intelligent and inspiring goal is the first step to success. s |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
...Lesson for Nasa! US Airmail and Aviation
Do keep in mind that the US Gov sponsored the Airmail program for
multiple reasons - of which 'jumpstarting the aviation industry' only one, if not a side effect. Hmm, didn't find much about this in a quick web search. I found a few mentions of "Kelly Act", the text of the act, and the interesting ways it was amended later, but not much about the motivations. I don't think the Congressional Record is online from back then, for example... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
...Lesson for Nasa! US Airmail and Aviation
mike flugennock wrote: You mean, like http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/zucocket.htm http://www.astronautix.com/graphics/z/zucux33.jpg ? Please, give me a huge break. This reminds me of a National Lampoon article supposedly from the late 1930's that had the headline "Germany intends to start robotic aerial mail service between Europe and Britain in coming years" and showed some German military men standing in front of a V-1. This is a fun webpage: http://home.ionet.net/~paroales/ROCKET.HTM Having a Rocketgram dispatched by His Highness The Maharajah would be very cool. Pat |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
...Lesson for Nasa! US Airmail and Aviation
Pat Flannery wrote:
mike flugennock wrote: You mean, like http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/zucocket.htm http://www.astronautix.com/graphics/z/zucux33.jpg ? Please, give me a huge break. This reminds me of a National Lampoon article supposedly from the late 1930's that had the headline "Germany intends to start robotic aerial mail service between Europe and Britain in coming years" and showed some German military men standing in front of a V-1. This is a fun webpage: http://home.ionet.net/~paroales/ROCKET.HTM Having a Rocketgram dispatched by His Highness The Maharajah would be very cool... Yeah, it would; depends on how it actually arrives at your house, though. (IN-COMIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNGGGGGGG!) -- .. "Though I could not caution all, I yet may warn a few: Don't lend your hand to raise no flag atop no ship of fools!" --grateful dead. __________________________________________________ _____________ Mike Flugennock, flugennock at sinkers dot org "Mikey'zine": dubya dubya dubya dot sinkers dot org |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
...Lesson for Nasa! US Airmail and Aviation
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
...Lesson for Nasa! US Airmail and Aviation
"Hyperboreea" wrote in message
ups.com... Solar power requires massive infrastructure. You would need a cost per Kg about 2 orders of magnitude lower than the current. Prolly right... Also, IMHO, SPS will not be able to provide more than a small fraction of energy needs. What, are we going to run out of space in GEO? It all depends on what assumptions we make about our space lift capability. If we build a lift capability which can loft SPS at a rate to make a significant contribution to global energy needs, then that's what will happen. The fact that SPS can be tremendously enlarged without any obvious environmental problems here on Earth is one of its selling points. -- Regards, Mike Combs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- By all that you hold dear on this good Earth I bid you stand, Men of the West! Aragorn |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
...Lesson for Nasa! US Airmail and Aviation
On Sat, 13 May 2006 09:48:59 -0400, "jonathan"
wrote: [snipped] Science at Nasa Beam it Down, Scotty! "Solar power collected in space and beamed to Earth could be an environmentally friendly solution to our planet's growing energy problems." http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23mar_1.htm Jonathan Did they ever do any studies of what beaming all that power through the atmosphere would do to things like the ozone layer and weather patterns, or is it so small compared to what we get from the SUN that it wouldn't make a difference. Actually, I've wondered if we could do some weather and energy usage control with shades or reflectors in space. Could you diminish the power of a hurricane by cutting off much of the sunlight to it since it seems like warmth that makes hurricanes grow. How about partially shading places like Los Angeles on hot summer days to cut A/C energy usage or reflecting light to add an extra hour of mild daylight in the winter. Of course, we'd have to be extremely careful when messing with the weather. Except for hurricanes, I'd limit it to very densely populated areas like LA where a lot of power usage might be eliminated. Unfortunately, being able to shade or light a large area from space would have some military potential as well, so it's probably against some treaty to possess such capability. -- David |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
...Lesson for Nasa! US Airmail and Aviation
"David Ball" wrote in message
... Did they ever do any studies of what beaming all that power through the atmosphere would do to things like the ozone layer and weather patterns, or is it so small compared to what we get from the SUN that it wouldn't make a difference. Partly the latter. No affect on ozone, and since the frequency chosen is one not readily absorbed by water vapor (for that very reason) shouldn't be any significant affect on weather. There may be an affect on the ionosphere which might annoy some ham radio operators, possibly. -- Regards, Mike Combs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- By all that you hold dear on this good Earth I bid you stand, Men of the West! Aragorn |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
...Lesson for Nasa! US Airmail and Aviation
On Sat, 13 May 2006 09:48:59 -0400, jonathan wrote:
"What began as a desire and need to carry mail by air became today's global system of passenger airlines." http://www.centennialofflight.gov/es...rmail/POL6.htm There can be little doubt that the efforts of the US govt to jump start commercial aviation has changed the world substantially and for the better. The military started off by providing the initial technology, rikkety Jennys, and some daring pilots. But the govt provided something else far more substantial to creating the world-changing industry of commercial aviation. A market! A cargo! The US Airmail. So....what is the market/cargo for space? Water. Lunar Lander. Space Station Parts. Space Station Supplies. Mars Lander. Space Station Astronauts. Food. Fuel. Lunar Explorers. The government currently has a budget for these items. Why not these thing to start with? -- Craig Fink Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|