The geometric basis for stellar evolution

It is 24 years ago since I started to work on an idea using one of the oldest conceptions known to humans in dealing with opposite qualities inherent in all objects along with a specific geometric which has attracted people of creativity.

http://www.spacetelescope.org/static...n/opo9714e.jpg

http://images.unurthed.com/Yeats-opposing-gyres-68.jpg

A block of gold and a block of silver of the same weight will occupy different volumes and also different densities hence the basis for an approach which encompasses natural efficiency and beauty that people generally recognize even if in outlines.

The greater the volume the lower the density applied to all objects hence shades of stellar evolution begin to appear even at this stage. The joke with current conceptions is that there is a belief in a conception of 'infinite density/zero volume' which means exactly the same as 'zero density/infinite volume' insofar as they both describe absolutely 'nothing'.

The transition phase that is a supernova event represents a shift in the volume/density ratio from a singular star without a solar system to a more compact star with a solar system.

It is clear that while clocks have a place as tools, the clockwork solar system of the late 17th century is obstructive and false along with the attempt to dress this system up in the early 20th century with fanciful notions of 'time travel', an indulgence not worth pursuing for 21st century researchers.

Although I would see the objections of vested interests I have no objection to their continuance presently however there is an entirely different approach to evolutionary sciences along with structural and dynamical considerations which should make this century the most vibrant of them all in matters of astronomy and terrestrial sciences.