|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
LX90 See's first light - First Opinions
I've never been much good at star-hopping, hence the desirability of GOTO.
We recently left a small GOTO in South Africa for future visits (aaaahhh, southern skies...) and after a disappointing brush with an Ebay 'special' decided to take the plunge on an LX90. The manual seems pretty comprehensive and is easily read. The scope needs minimal assembly. With tonight's clear skies, the scope saw it's first light. Jupiter and Saturn, although impressive by the smaller reflector standards, were less impressive than I had expected. A star test quickly showed that the scope needed collimating, a task I've not enjoyed on newtonian scopes. The LX90 proved to be a piece of cake to sort and took less than 5 minutes on my first attempt with this type of scope. The trick seemed to be in making very small adjustments and the three (secondary) screws needed about 1/8th of a turn each. Less than 5 minutes work saw the 'airy disk' with well formed concentric rings. A quick turn to Jupiter now saw the red (pale) spot, and clear definition in the cloud bands. Saturn was awesome at 150x magnification. The Cassini division and ring-shadow on the planet now easily visible. Although in a light polluted area (Farnham, Surrey), we're pretty lucky with a very private garden and no street interfering lamps. Everything has a price; and the privacy afforded by the trees cut-out anything within 15 to 20 deg of the East-West horizon, and 20 to 30 deg of the North-South Horizon. A quick tour without much time taken to study detail allowed a rapid test-tour of objects preselected before sunset: Saturn-Jupiter-Venus-Mars M81-M82-M51-M34-M63-M94-M106-M37-M44-M35-NGC3377-M13-M92-M64 Moon 1-Ceres (sketch of region confirmed on star chart later) Without specifically hunting, the faintest star noticed came in at 10.4 (near Ceres) with a bright moon and light pollution. I'll see how low this figure can go in a darker circumstance (13?). The scope brought most objects within the field of view of a wider angle 40mm (F=2000mm hence 50x) eyepiece. With 'precision' mode set, the autostar brought everything into the centre of the eyepiece everytime. Precision mode hunts for a star to calibrate against prior to each new object. The images stayed in the centre of the eyepiece for the odd ocassion that the scope was left unattended (for up to about 10 minutes). I'll perform a longer test at a future date. It's much noisier than my celestron GOTO while searching, but remakably quiet (in comparison) while tracking. The telescope and its controls feel solid and the overall impression is one of a quality product. The finderscope is bright and showed an open cluster clearly on one occasion (on western horizon, never bothered to establish which of the nearby clusters this could be owing to the quick test). The tripod and mount appear very sturdy; vibration was unoticeable, any knocks were settled in less than a second. Early opine: I'm very happy with the scope and am looking forward to frequent usage. Imaging with the LPI will be the next challenge. The LPI documentation isn't as clear, and a couple of hours were needed to get the scope, PC and Imager talking. Regards Chris |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Chris Taylor" wrote in message
... decided to take the plunge on an LX90. A quick turn to Jupiter now saw the red (pale) spot, and clear definition in the cloud bands. Saturn was awesome at 150x magnification. The Cassini division and ring-shadow on the planet now easily visible. Early opine: I'm very happy with the scope and am looking forward to frequent usage. Imaging with the LPI will be the next challenge. The LPI documentation isn't as clear, and a couple of hours were needed to get the scope, PC and Imager talking. snipped I too was making use of some rare clear skies last night with my ETX-105. Couldn't see Jupiter's red spot visually despite looking (!), but caught it on my Nikon Coolpix 4500 via BCF's new DigimaxT 40 eyepiece adaptor. Got some decent images of the moon as well. What features of the LX200 are missing from the LX90? Big difference in price... -- M Stewart Milton Keynes, UK www.megalith.freeserve.co.uk/oddimage.htm http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/ms1938/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"""Waiting for my LX90 to arrive ... """
I'd be glad to hear your views also; once the clouds have settled after delivery... Regards Chris "Andrew Cockburn" wrote in message ... Congrats ! Waiting for my LX90 to arrive ... its even harder now I just read your post :-) Andrew Cockburn In article , says... I've never been much good at star-hopping, hence the desirability of GOTO. We recently left a small GOTO in South Africa for future visits (aaaahhh, southern skies...) and after a disappointing brush with an Ebay 'special' decided to take the plunge on an LX90. The manual seems pretty comprehensive and is easily read. The scope needs minimal assembly. With tonight's clear skies, the scope saw it's first light. Jupiter and Saturn, although impressive by the smaller reflector standards, were less impressive than I had expected. A star test quickly showed that the scope needed collimating, a task I've not enjoyed on newtonian scopes. The LX90 proved to be a piece of cake to sort and took less than 5 minutes on my first attempt with this type of scope. The trick seemed to be in making very small adjustments and the three (secondary) screws needed about 1/8th of a turn each. Less than 5 minutes work saw the 'airy disk' with well formed concentric rings. A quick turn to Jupiter now saw the red (pale) spot, and clear definition in the cloud bands. Saturn was awesome at 150x magnification. The Cassini division and ring-shadow on the planet now easily visible. Although in a light polluted area (Farnham, Surrey), we're pretty lucky with a very private garden and no street interfering lamps. Everything has a price; and the privacy afforded by the trees cut-out anything within 15 to 20 deg of the East-West horizon, and 20 to 30 deg of the North-South Horizon. A quick tour without much time taken to study detail allowed a rapid test-tour of objects preselected before sunset: Saturn-Jupiter-Venus-Mars M81-M82-M51-M34-M63-M94-M106-M37-M44-M35-NGC3377-M13-M92-M64 Moon 1-Ceres (sketch of region confirmed on star chart later) Without specifically hunting, the faintest star noticed came in at 10.4 (near Ceres) with a bright moon and light pollution. I'll see how low this figure can go in a darker circumstance (13?). The scope brought most objects within the field of view of a wider angle 40mm (F=2000mm hence 50x) eyepiece. With 'precision' mode set, the autostar brought everything into the centre of the eyepiece everytime. Precision mode hunts for a star to calibrate against prior to each new object. The images stayed in the centre of the eyepiece for the odd ocassion that the scope was left unattended (for up to about 10 minutes). I'll perform a longer test at a future date. It's much noisier than my celestron GOTO while searching, but remakably quiet (in comparison) while tracking. The telescope and its controls feel solid and the overall impression is one of a quality product. The |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"""What features of the LX200 are missing from the LX90?"""
Hi Malcolm I understand that the LX 90 and 8" LX 200 share the same optics and tripod. Meade advertise that the optical experience is identical in both scopes. The primary differences being in the drive accuracy (2' vs 5')and database size (about 5x larger in the LX200). Meade advise the use of the LX200 where extensive imaging or astrophotography is intended. The fork arms and gears are larger in the LX 200. I've pasted the Meade comparison blurb below for you: """LX90 or LX200GPS? For many observers the 8" LX90 is all the telescope ever required. The LX90 includes the exact same 8" f/10 optical system as the 8" LX200GPS, so that the visual observing experience is identical in both instruments. Notwithstanding the many virtues of the LX90, however, we still recommend the LX200GPS for those amateurs who can afford the higher price of the LX200GPS and who intend an extensive program of CCD imaging, astrophotography, or deep-space observing. The LX200GPS's 145,000-object database is almost five times the size of the LX90's, and the LX200GPS slews at 8°/sec to a pointing precision of 2 arc-minutes or better, compared to the 5 arc-minute pointing precision of the LX90. The LX200GPS, with its oversize fork arms, larger worm gears, GPS alignment, zero image-shift microfocuser, primary mirror lock, and dual-axis Smart DriveTM, is the most advanced altazimuth-equatorial platform ever offered in a production 8" Schmidt-Cassegrain. The real answer is that one can not go wrong with either telescope: the proper choice depends on the user's long-term applications and budget. """ Regards Chris "Malcolm Stewart" wrote in message ... "Chris Taylor" wrote in message ... decided to take the plunge on an LX90. A quick turn to Jupiter now saw the red (pale) spot, and clear definition in the cloud bands. Saturn was awesome at 150x magnification. The Cassini division and ring-shadow on the planet now easily visible. Early opine: I'm very happy with the scope and am looking forward to frequent usage. Imaging with the LPI will be the next challenge. The LPI documentation isn't as clear, and a couple of hours were needed to get the scope, PC and Imager talking. snipped I too was making use of some rare clear skies last night with my ETX-105. Couldn't see Jupiter's red spot visually despite looking (!), but caught it on my Nikon Coolpix 4500 via BCF's new DigimaxT 40 eyepiece adaptor. Got some decent images of the moon as well. What features of the LX200 are missing from the LX90? Big difference in price... -- M Stewart Milton Keynes, UK www.megalith.freeserve.co.uk/oddimage.htm http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/ms1938/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Chris Taylor" wrote in message
news:Ehhac.422$qI1.43@newsfe1-win... """What features of the LX200 are missing from the LX90?""" Hi Malcolm I understand that the LX 90 and 8" LX 200 share the same optics and tripod. Meade advertise that the optical experience is identical in both scopes. The primary differences being in the drive accuracy (2' vs 5')and database size (about 5x larger in the LX200). Meade advise the use of the LX200 where extensive imaging or astrophotography is intended. snip Regards Chris Hi Chris, Many thanks for your reply - guess I'll have to get real serious to justify the extra expense! Malcolm -- M Stewart Milton Keynes, UK www.megalith.freeserve.co.uk/oddimage.htm http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/ms1938/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Chris Taylor" wrote in message ... I've never been much good at star-hopping, hence the desirability of GOTO. We recently left a small GOTO in South Africa for future visits (aaaahhh, southern skies...) and after a disappointing brush with an Ebay 'special' decided to take the plunge on an LX90. snip You've bought a pretty good scope. Just thought you might be interested in paying my site a little attention.... there's a few projects on there that can help to make your life with the LX90 even more pleasant.... I know, they've helped me alot. Mind you at the moment, I'm working on my next project - a full scale powerpack to power scope, dew heater and other stuff from a nice little 85Ah battery! Hopefully, once I've got all the parts togther I'll be able to update my site. Glad you like the LX90, I've found that the optics are just as good as any other scope that I've seen - including some 12" scopes! The reason for this is that whilst the 12" has greater light gather capability, it also tends to suffer more from bad weather conditions! Regards Colin Dawson www.cjdawson.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Colin Thanks for the link. I took some pix with the LPI last night. Haven't figured out how to get them onto a web page yet. I'll let you know when its sorted. Regards Chris "Colin Dawson" wrote in message ... "Chris Taylor" wrote in message ... I've never been much good at star-hopping, hence the desirability of GOTO. We recently left a small GOTO in South Africa for future visits (aaaahhh, southern skies...) and after a disappointing brush with an Ebay 'special' decided to take the plunge on an LX90. snip You've bought a pretty good scope. Just thought you might be interested in paying my site a little attention.... there's a few projects on there that can help to make your life with the LX90 even more pleasant.... I know, they've helped me alot. Mind you at the moment, I'm working on my next project - a full scale powerpack to power scope, dew heater and other stuff from a nice little 85Ah battery! Hopefully, once I've got all the parts togther I'll be able to update my site. Glad you like the LX90, I've found that the optics are just as good as any other scope that I've seen - including some 12" scopes! The reason for this is that whilst the 12" has greater light gather capability, it also tends to suffer more from bad weather conditions! Regards Colin Dawson www.cjdawson.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Chris.
The LPI? oh yeah, it's meade new fangled web cam thingy. Grrr, wish I'd got one with my scope. ;-) To put up an image onto a web page is really quite easy.... first you'll need the piccy saved as a .JPG (there's other formats too, but JPG will do). Then you'll need to contruct the page. Some programs will do this for you, but here's how to it it manually.. Use notepd and copy this text... html body img src="MyPic.jpg" /body /html Then save this as a file in the same directory as your .jpg file. When you save the file give it a file extension of .html Next double click on this new file and Windows Explorer should startup, your picture will be displayed. The final step is that you need to use an FTP program to upload the files to your webspace in the internet (you ISP will help you do that if needed) If you want to get more adventurous with the web page, then "borrow" examples from other websites that you like the look of... everyone does it. Regards Colin "Chris Taylor" wrote in message ... Hi Colin Thanks for the link. I took some pix with the LPI last night. Haven't figured out how to get them onto a web page yet. I'll let you know when its sorted. Regards Chris "Colin Dawson" wrote in message ... "Chris Taylor" wrote in message ... I've never been much good at star-hopping, hence the desirability of GOTO. We recently left a small GOTO in South Africa for future visits (aaaahhh, southern skies...) and after a disappointing brush with an Ebay 'special' decided to take the plunge on an LX90. snip You've bought a pretty good scope. Just thought you might be interested in paying my site a little attention.... there's a few projects on there that can help to make your life with the LX90 even more pleasant.... I know, they've helped me alot. Mind you at the moment, I'm working on my next project - a full scale powerpack to power scope, dew heater and other stuff from a nice little 85Ah battery! Hopefully, once I've got all the parts togther I'll be able to update my site. Glad you like the LX90, I've found that the optics are just as good as any other scope that I've seen - including some 12" scopes! The reason for this is that whilst the 12" has greater light gather capability, it also tends to suffer more from bad weather conditions! Regards Colin Dawson www.cjdawson.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Light year distance question | Tony Sims | Technology | 7 | April 29th 05 04:41 PM |
Beyond Linear Cosmology and Hypnotic Theology | Yoda | Misc | 0 | June 30th 04 07:33 PM |
NASA Test of Light Speed Extrapolation | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 26 | February 12th 04 02:29 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |