![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi oc It seems a proton is not a blackhole and the reason is it is not
heavy enough. Now it is made up of three particles called quarks,and the strong force particle called the gluon. Read in Hawking book "The universe in a nut Shell" There could be a blackhole in the micro realm having a size less than half a Planck length that weighs a billion tons. That fits well with my thinking,and I'm sure this sub- microscopic black hole exists. I believe this size blackhole exists in the fabric of space,and could be the greatest part of the missing gravity (93% missing) of all galaxies. Bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems a proton is not a blackhole and
the reason is it is not heavy enough. Notice the qualifier "referanced _to the lower cosmos_". In 'our' cosmos, the proton is merely a proton. But in the lower cosmos where every atom is a complete universe within itself, the central proton is the Primal Particle of that universe just as *our* PP is of our universe (under the CBB model, that is). Now it is made up of three particles called quarks,and the strong force particle called the gluon. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Well, in accelerator collisions you certainly get numerous artifacts that decay almost instantaneously in 'our' spacetime. They're predictable and repeatable, indicating they arise from underlying symmetries within the nucleus. But they have no independant existance outside the nucleus. Yet they are assigned colorful names *as if* they were real, stand-alone particles. In Wolter's view they are 'condensates' bearing the signature of symmetries below the proton's EH. Even the 'Top Quark' would be the microcosmic equivalent of the Singularity at the core of *our* Primal Particle. Under Wolter's model, only four fundamental particles have independant existance in 'our' spacetime: the proton, neutron, neutrino and electron PLUS the short-lived muon released in cosmic-ray collisions. oc |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi oc I hate saying in my (iffy posts)" that I read it" I want these
post to be interesting,and close to the mysteries of nature,but staying for the most part in the realm of good science.(not much science fiction) This is in a book. A blackhole the size of an atom would have the mass of a mountain. For an atom size black hole to form 10^36 atoms must be squeezed into the dimensions of one. oc that is one hell of a lot of atoms,but let me say I dought that a proton is a blackhole,I'm not saying it is impossible not to be. Bert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
disaster warning | Anonymous | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 23rd 04 10:31 PM |
Debate on GR | Jack Sarfatti | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 9th 04 02:53 AM |
Invention: Action Device To Generate Unidirectional Force. | Abhi | Astronomy Misc | 21 | August 14th 03 09:57 PM |
Invention For Revolution In Transport Industry | Abhi | Astronomy Misc | 16 | August 6th 03 02:42 AM |