#1
|
|||
|
|||
antenna
Astronomic antenna
This article describes an idea for an antenna aimed for communication over a very large distance of astronomic units and beyond the solar system. The method of the antenna is in contrast with the attitude today, and I ask the reader to be positive as much as possible with it. Description of the antennas used today The antennas used today are of this type: Large dish antennas, having a diameter of about 30 meters that work at the microwave range. These antennas have a reception area of about 1000 square meters. These antennas must be aimed to the transmitting source at a very high accuracy of 1 million. Large radio frequency antenna fields, (like HAARP) having an area of 100,000 square meters. These antennas can transmit frequency in the range of 2-10 MHz. Large radio telescope (ARECIBO), having an area of about 100,000 square meters, working at a frequency of 300-9000 MHz. This antenna must be aimed exactly at the transmitting source to receive its signal. 4000 microwave dish antennas of 5 meters in diameter and a total reception area of 100,000 square meters. These antennas must be aimed exactly at the source to receive the signal. We can see that these antennas have two main parameters: The area they receive is 100,000 square meters. They must be aimed at a very high accuracy of 1:10,000,000 over the sky sphere, to receive the signal. Microwave antennas are very directional Microwave antennas are too directional. The antenna receives only from a tiny part of the sky. The method is like directing a laser beam, and detecting it with a very short angle telescope. Microwave antennas are very frequency selective In addition to this there is the question the selective frequency: Microwave antennas work at a very selective frequency. The antenna has its good amplification thanks to selecting the exact wavelength. There is no wideband microwave antenna that receives over for example 2-12 GHz. If such an antenna will be built, it will lose its advantage of low noise. The pathfinder spaceship to mars used for example a carrier wavelength of 8 GHz, and a bandwidth of only 80 KHz. The ratio being 1:100,000. In other there are 10,000 channels between 8-9 GHz. There is not even a special reason that the signal from another civilization will use a 80KHz bandwidth like we will try to detect on earth. Even if they will accidentally use such bandwidth, still the chance that it will fit exactly to the channel received on earth is 1:100,000. This lowers the chance to detect life by 100,000 times. Since each antenna has a gain and directivity of 10 million, the chance to make accidental communication is e-14. Since the bit-rate in that kind of communication is very slow, less than 1 bit per second, even if we scan the sky for years, it will be impossible to detect anyone. And in numbers: If the bit-rate is 1, and we need 10 bits to detect intelligent signal. Than we need to stay 10 seconds on each scanning point. It will take us 80,000 million years to scan all the sky using that method and to make accidental communication. We see that the high gain and directional antenna is not an advantage for that purpose. Microwave antennas receives a small signal A 30 meter dish antenna has an effective area of about 1000 square meters only. The parameter "gain" relates to how much electrical current the antenna generates from the electromagnetic signal. As gain of 1 relates to one dipole having a length of 1/2 wavelength. In the case microwave gain of 1 means very little electricity because such a dipole is very tiny antenna having an area of 1 square centimeter. The gain of 70 db is 10,000,000. For a 1000 square meter area dish antenna it means that it has the capacity to generate electricity like 10,000,000 million antennas, each having an effective area of 1 square centimeter. The capacity of that dish antenna of generating electricity is not more than of a simple 30 meter dipole antenna. Both antennas will have the same efficiency of generating electricity from the same electromagnetic wave. It is like to compare the work of 10 million ants with the work of one elephant. If we need to transfer megabytes per second, than we must use high carrier frequency, but the fact is that when the signal is weak we must lower the bit-rate in order to detect it. The communication with Mars today is at 5Kbits per second. For that bit-rate we can actually use frequency of 5 KHz and we don't need to use 10 GHz. Antenna amplifier noise A 10 GHz antenna amplifier does not have less noise than a 5 KHz antenna amplifier. A simple, low cost, not cryogenic, low noise, low frequency amplifier will have an input noise of e-23 watt (1. ( The noise of a cryogenic cooled microwave antenna is about the same, being e-21 watt (2). As the frequency of the input amplifier is lower, there is less noise from it. Since the internal amplifier noise is the same, than the signal amplitude becomes the major important factor. Large area antenna will have large signal. Long antenna can be directional and have higher gain Using a reflector and an element will allow increasing the ratio by 10 or more, if it is needed. A long dipole antenna is much more sensitive than antenna arrays on Earth If we put a 50KHZ dipole antenna as a satellite to Earth, it will be 3 Kilometer long. The wavelength will be 6 kilometers. The effective area will be 3000 ^2 square meters. This is 9 million square meters. This is about 100 times more than the HAARP array, the radio-telescope or the 4000 dish antennas of 5 meter. The ratio between the received signal power and the transmitted signal power depends only on the effective area of the antenna and the distance (3). The ratio is: The wavelength ^ 2 ------------------------ The distance ^ 2 In the case of a signal transmitted from 200 million Kilometers, using a 6 Kilometer wavelength, the ratio will be: 6 ^ 2 / 200 e6 ^2 = e-15. A 10 watt transmitted signal will be received at e-14 watt. This received power is 1000 times stronger than the signal that we receive today from Mars, using sophisticated high gain microwave antennas. A dipole antenna more far from Earth If we put the antenna more far from Earth, the temperature of it will be lower. At lower temperature the electrical resistance is lower. If the antenna will be at about 3 AU from the Sun, we can multiply its length without multiplying its weight. The active area and the sensitivity will be increased by 4. The frequency will increase by 2. A dipole antenna made of a superconductor If we are more advanced, than we can make a superconductor cable and send it to a place were it is cold enough to be superconductive. The superconductor dipole will be 30 Kilometer long and will work at 5 KHz. The antenna will be positioned at a distance of about 6 astronomic units from the Sun. The 30 Kilometer antenna will weight less than 100 Kilograms because superconductors have 200 times less electrical resistance than copper. At 6 AU it will not need a coolant since superconductors today work at 77 degrees Kelvin. There are already low cost flexible superconductors used by the power stations (5)) The effective area of a 30 kilometer long dipole antenna is equal to 10,000 HAARP arrays. At that frequency and distance from the Sun, the noise level of the antenna will be very low. The noise will be much less than the noise of microwave noise coming from Sun or other stars. The most powerful signal at frequency of about 5 KHz are generated at 150 AU from the Sun, these waves are also confined to lower frequencies and they are not a problem at 5 KHz beyond 10 AU. Frequency of 5 KHz cannot reach the Earth because of the electron ion plasma around the Sun that blocks all frequencies below 20 KHz from reaching the Earth. The same physical laws here will also work for any other civilization or a place like Earth. In order to receive and transmit at large effective, they also need large antennas and low frequency. There is much less low frequency noise in space, than high frequency noise or microwave noise. The source of the noise is the Suns. The ion plasma around the Suns blocks the low frequency much more than it blocks high frequency. In our Sun the cutoff frequency is 20 KHz at 1 AU from the Sun, 10 KHz at 2 AU and 5Khz at 4 AU. Frequency 1 MHz frequency is blocked at 0.01 AU from the Sun. One photon detection Low frequency electromagnetic waves, like optical waves, are made of photons. Like it is not possible to detect a light signal, having energy less than one photon, it would not be possible to detect a radio signal, having energy of less than a photon. The closest star to us is 240,000 Astronomic units from us, or 36,000,000,000 million kilometers. If a signal from other civilizations will enter the solar system, and received by an antenna, it might be not more energetic than few photons. There is a ratio between the powers of the photon and the wavelength. A photon at a frequency of 10 Gigahertz is million times more energetic than a photon of a frequency of a 10 KHz. Because of this, the weakest signal that can be detected at 10 KHz is 1,000,000 times less powerful than the weakest signal that can be detected at 10 GHz. Background Noise The background noise above 1 AU from the Sun is less than instrumental noise, and below e-16 (4). The frequency and the intensity of the plasma oscillation show a tendency to decrease with increasing radial distance from the Sun. Solar radio bursts tend to be more intense at higher frequencies, which are generated closer to the Sun, and not by lower frequency, far from the Sun. First contact communication When Galileo spaceship wanted to communicate with Earth, it first transmitted using a simple dipole antenna, using low frequency. Only after the first communication was done, and the position of Galileo was known on Earth and Galileo knew where Earth is, only then a microwave directional communication have started. The microwave transmitter and receiver on Earth had a matched frequency and bandwidth. Without this they would not communicate. The chance to start a communication with directional dish antennas, with another civilization is zero. The chance to start communication a non-directional, long dipole antenna in space, is at least e12 higher. If we want to detect other advanced civilizations, we should give this idea a chance and support it. It is a fact that we spend billions of dollars over decades trying to communicate with other civilizations, using microwave methods, and we failed. By Gil Teva ( ) (1) http://www.femto.de/datasheet/DLPVA100BUNS.pdf (2) http://www.ka9q.net/mpf_budget.html (3) http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teachin...es/node83.html (formula 1001) (4) http://www-pw.physics.uiowa.edu/plas...y/summary.html (5) http://www.amsuper.com/html/newsEven...793757741.html Telefax: 02-6724273 Email: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
URI physics employee invents new antenna technology | Uncle Al | Astronomy Misc | 14 | July 31st 04 04:25 PM |
Antenna for receiving pulsar signals | George Dishman | Astronomy Misc | 22 | January 27th 04 10:26 PM |
Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS | [email protected] \(formerly\) | Astronomy Misc | 273 | December 28th 03 10:42 PM |
Deep Space Network Gears up for Interplanetary Boom | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 6th 03 08:38 PM |
SOHO resumes full operation (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 17th 03 01:27 PM |