|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#861
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: Greg Neill wrote: And you don't see a problem with that? No. Which demonstrates you have never studied any physics. |
#862
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: Sam Wormley wrote: [...] The introduction of a "luminiferous ether" will prove to be superfluous inasmuch as the view here to be developed will not require an "absolutely stationary space" provided with special properties, nor assign a velocity-vector to a point of the empty space in which electromagnetic processes take place. Like I said before, given that the Earth is the center of the universe no aether can ever be detected from its surface using low precision instruments. Do you have any clue whow stupid this sounds? |
#863
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
Do you have any clue whow stupid this sounds? "A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be." -- Albert Einstein "If you are out to describe the truth, leave elegance to the tailor." -- Albert Einstein |
#864
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Sam Wormley wrote:
Phil Bouchard wrote: *** GR *** theta = 4Gm / rc^2 Phil -- How did you derive this algebraic expression? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravita...time_curvature What observables (and what are their sources) do/did you plug into this expression? What care did you give to the retermination of r and m? Have you ever done a calculation? Show us your calculation units and all. This is GR, not FR. I'll give an inside the sphere calculation that will handle the fudge factor, which makes a big difference. |
#865
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Apr 9, 12:00*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote: Do you have any clue whow stupid this sounds? "A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be." -- Albert Einstein "If you are out to describe the truth, leave elegance to the tailor." -- Albert Einstein You are not Einstein. |
#866
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Sam Wormley wrote:
You have yet to show that you can do a calculation, Phil. Perhaps you might try that. Show the exact equation and each number and and its source (with physical units) and show the calculation step by step. You have never done that, nor do you have the education to do so. Well up to now in 2 months I get the same answers as Einstein, and without plagiarizing. It looks like my education is better than Doug's since Doug thinks a paradox is science. |
#867
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Greg Neill wrote:
[...] How can that be if the distance from the center of gravitation (the Earth's center -- remember, we're only considering the Earth's contribution here) is the same? Are you saying that the Earth's field is not spherically symmetric? Because the Sun's influence is slightly different behind and ahead of the Earth. The distance from the Sun never is the same either. Empirically, the gravitational influence on clocks depends only on the radial distance. Satellite clocks bear this out, as do the network of atomic clocks on the Earth's surface. So your theory is shown to be wrong versus empirical data yet again. All that is given is the average of both kinetic and gravitational time dilations after one day of operation. Each instants are different. [...] GR turns out the answers without the need for buggy computer code or mysterious fudge factors that seem to vary from point to point and moment to moment. The fudge factor is an ambient influence and needs to be calculated once for each scale. The solar system fudge factor is around 2.5e45 km^2/m^2 and will be good until the death of the Milky Way. Sorry, but I can't see that at all from the nature of your mathematical expressions. And I haven't seen you wield calculus at all, so it's a moot point. Give me an address or PO box and I will send a copy. I am not sharing this over here. Is this an example of your professional programming skills? The first three links on the page return a "You are not authorized to view this page" message. Sloppy. I deleted the files because I don't use this homepage anymore. This dates back from 2003 as you can see. |
#868
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
Which demonstrates you have never studied any physics. Since Doug only knows about blunders and paradoxes, he thinks being wrong is perfectly valid. |
#869
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote:
Greg Neill wrote: [...] How can that be if the distance from the center of gravitation (the Earth's center -- remember, we're only considering the Earth's contribution here) is the same? Are you saying that the Earth's field is not spherically symmetric? Because the Sun's influence is slightly different behind and ahead of the Earth. The distance from the Sun never is the same either. Empirically, the gravitational influence on clocks depends only on the radial distance. Satellite clocks bear this out, as do the network of atomic clocks on the Earth's surface. So your theory is shown to be wrong versus empirical data yet again. All that is given is the average of both kinetic and gravitational time dilations after one day of operation. Each instants are different. You've ignored the fact that I clearly stated that *only* the Earth's contribution was being considered. The Sun (and anything else) is not relevant here. Or are you saying that your theory is incapable of handling a lone mass? Further, your statement about the GR results being a daily average is false. GPS clocks are in continuous use, and such fluctuations through the day would be obvious. The same is true for the network of atomic clocks around the globe. Where the "observer" is who is requesting clock readings from other sites does not affect that site's clocks. [...] GR turns out the answers without the need for buggy computer code or mysterious fudge factors that seem to vary from point to point and moment to moment. The fudge factor is an ambient influence and needs to be calculated once for each scale. The solar system fudge factor is around 2.5e45 km^2/m^2 and will be good until the death of the Milky Way. That's a bold statement considering how often it's changed already. Also, the Sun is not guaranteed to always be in such a lonely neighborhood, and relatively close encounters with other stars are probable. Sorry, but I can't see that at all from the nature of your mathematical expressions. And I haven't seen you wield calculus at all, so it's a moot point. Give me an address or PO box and I will send a copy. I am not sharing this over here. A kind offer, but I would prefer to discuss your work here. Is this an example of your professional programming skills? The first three links on the page return a "You are not authorized to view this page" message. Sloppy. I deleted the files because I don't use this homepage anymore. This dates back from 2003 as you can see. (!) Then why provide the link? |
#870
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Sam Wormley wrote:
I have a whole book of Einstein quotes... Phil, you wrote, "...given that the Earth is the center of the universe no aether can ever be detected from its surface using low precision instruments". What makes you think the earth is the center of the universe? Because the MM experiment proved it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finite Relativism: Review Request | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 519 | September 25th 12 12:26 AM |
25% OFF -- Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 28th 09 10:54 AM |
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 4 | January 26th 09 10:00 PM |
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 12 | January 1st 09 04:20 PM |
BLAMING SPECIAL RELATIVITY? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 13th 08 01:05 PM |