A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1351  
Old May 1st 09, 10:29 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Phil Bouchard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,402
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

doug wrote:

No one is going to pay any attention to your delusions.
You can get a good laugh from any university if you want
but that is not what I think you are looking for.


Well FR wasn't plagiarized and I don't need redefining logic to make it
work.

"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." -- Albert Einstein
  #1352  
Old May 1st 09, 10:56 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Eric Gisse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,465
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

On May 1, 1:04*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote:

Now you can just sit back and watch it be ignored by the world.


Go back to your square roots and wormholes then.


That's so charmingly stupid.
  #1353  
Old May 1st 09, 11:11 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,129
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


Now you can just sit back and watch it be ignored by the world.



Go back to your square roots and wormholes then.


No one is going to pay any attention to your delusions.
You can get a good laugh from any university if you want
but that is not what I think you are looking for.
  #1354  
Old May 1st 09, 11:15 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
PD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,572
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

On May 1, 5:56*am, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote:

My goodness, your delusions have gotten the better of you. I never
said such things and you have a bizarre imagination.


Here's something you cannot understand:https://www.createspace.com/3370163

It's done... and the book has a perfect mathematical representation of
the Universe.

The book will be available soon at the aforementioned link.


Oh dear.
This is unfortunately the kind of thing that happens when somebody
gets a little too emotionally involved in a project.
Now, unfortunately, you are committed to a lifetime of preoccupation
and growing despair.

PD
  #1355  
Old May 1st 09, 11:16 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Phil Bouchard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,402
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

doug wrote:

Well, you need redefining reality to make it work. It is very funny
to watch you thrash and squirm when you have no idea what relativity
actually says and how it is used today. You also have no clue that
QM uses relativity and will not work with FR. But that would require
you to study.


QM is only linked with GR with an unproven theoretical facet:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_gravity

FR allows FTL, so it goes along better than GR.

[...]
  #1356  
Old May 1st 09, 11:22 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
PD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,572
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

On May 1, 5:16*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote:

Well, you need redefining reality to make it work. It is very funny
to watch you thrash and squirm when you have no idea what relativity
actually says and how it is used today. You also have no clue that
QM uses relativity and will not work with FR. But that would require
you to study.


QM is only linked with GR with an unproven theoretical facet:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_gravity

FR allows FTL, so it goes along better than GR.

[...]


There is no FTL anything in QM.
  #1357  
Old May 1st 09, 11:27 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Phil Bouchard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,402
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

doug wrote:

[...]

FR allows FTL,


Therefore it is wrong.

so it goes along better than GR.

Better than what? Certainly not with the universe.


We live in a free world. If you think nature is defined by square roots
and has an unbreakable velocity cap then I am happy for you.

The evidence is already shown by the Hubble sphere natural FTL. FTL can
be reproduced artificially without any doubt.
  #1358  
Old May 1st 09, 11:31 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Phil Bouchard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,402
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

PD wrote:

Oh dear.
This is unfortunately the kind of thing that happens when somebody
gets a little too emotionally involved in a project.
Now, unfortunately, you are committed to a lifetime of preoccupation
and growing despair.

PD


You get emotional only when the work is 2 pages, and plagiarized.
  #1359  
Old May 1st 09, 11:48 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Phil Bouchard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,402
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof

doug wrote:

It is not up to me to define the universe. Or you for that matter. You
have been wrong on all your predictions and on your knowledge of
science. You have no chance to be correct. Do not quit your day job.


So you're saying Einstein defined the Universe? That means
singularities, wormholes, length and mass contraction, velocity cap of
3e8 m/s, the Hubble sphere problem, time travel in the past and
consequently an infinite amount of universes created on the fly, dark
matter, an inflating bread-like space and the light-year measurement
unit must all be right.

[...]

FTL can
be reproduced artificially without any doubt.


Except it cannot be.


Let competent people do the job then. I'm not sure why QM people care
about what Doug says.
  #1360  
Old May 1st 09, 11:49 PM posted to alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,129
Default Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof



Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


No one is going to pay any attention to your delusions.
You can get a good laugh from any university if you want
but that is not what I think you are looking for.



Well FR wasn't plagiarized and I don't need redefining logic to make it
work.


Well, you need redefining reality to make it work. It is very funny
to watch you thrash and squirm when you have no idea what relativity
actually says and how it is used today. You also have no clue that
QM uses relativity and will not work with FR. But that would require
you to study.

"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." -- Albert Einstein


More lying on phil's part.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finite Relativism: Review Request Phil Bouchard Astronomy Misc 519 September 25th 12 12:26 AM
25% OFF -- Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof Phil Bouchard Astronomy Misc 0 January 28th 09 10:54 AM
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof Phil Bouchard Astronomy Misc 4 January 26th 09 10:00 PM
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 12 January 1st 09 04:20 PM
BLAMING SPECIAL RELATIVITY? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 July 13th 08 01:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.