|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1351
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
No one is going to pay any attention to your delusions. You can get a good laugh from any university if you want but that is not what I think you are looking for. Well FR wasn't plagiarized and I don't need redefining logic to make it work. "If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." -- Albert Einstein |
#1352
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On May 1, 1:04*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote: Now you can just sit back and watch it be ignored by the world. Go back to your square roots and wormholes then. That's so charmingly stupid. |
#1353
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: doug wrote: Now you can just sit back and watch it be ignored by the world. Go back to your square roots and wormholes then. No one is going to pay any attention to your delusions. You can get a good laugh from any university if you want but that is not what I think you are looking for. |
#1354
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On May 1, 5:56*am, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote: My goodness, your delusions have gotten the better of you. I never said such things and you have a bizarre imagination. Here's something you cannot understand:https://www.createspace.com/3370163 It's done... and the book has a perfect mathematical representation of the Universe. The book will be available soon at the aforementioned link. Oh dear. This is unfortunately the kind of thing that happens when somebody gets a little too emotionally involved in a project. Now, unfortunately, you are committed to a lifetime of preoccupation and growing despair. PD |
#1355
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
Well, you need redefining reality to make it work. It is very funny to watch you thrash and squirm when you have no idea what relativity actually says and how it is used today. You also have no clue that QM uses relativity and will not work with FR. But that would require you to study. QM is only linked with GR with an unproven theoretical facet: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_gravity FR allows FTL, so it goes along better than GR. [...] |
#1356
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On May 1, 5:16*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote: Well, you need redefining reality to make it work. It is very funny to watch you thrash and squirm when you have no idea what relativity actually says and how it is used today. You also have no clue that QM uses relativity and will not work with FR. But that would require you to study. QM is only linked with GR with an unproven theoretical facet:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_gravity FR allows FTL, so it goes along better than GR. [...] There is no FTL anything in QM. |
#1357
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
[...] FR allows FTL, Therefore it is wrong. so it goes along better than GR. Better than what? Certainly not with the universe. We live in a free world. If you think nature is defined by square roots and has an unbreakable velocity cap then I am happy for you. The evidence is already shown by the Hubble sphere natural FTL. FTL can be reproduced artificially without any doubt. |
#1358
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
PD wrote:
Oh dear. This is unfortunately the kind of thing that happens when somebody gets a little too emotionally involved in a project. Now, unfortunately, you are committed to a lifetime of preoccupation and growing despair. PD You get emotional only when the work is 2 pages, and plagiarized. |
#1359
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
It is not up to me to define the universe. Or you for that matter. You have been wrong on all your predictions and on your knowledge of science. You have no chance to be correct. Do not quit your day job. So you're saying Einstein defined the Universe? That means singularities, wormholes, length and mass contraction, velocity cap of 3e8 m/s, the Hubble sphere problem, time travel in the past and consequently an infinite amount of universes created on the fly, dark matter, an inflating bread-like space and the light-year measurement unit must all be right. [...] FTL can be reproduced artificially without any doubt. Except it cannot be. Let competent people do the job then. I'm not sure why QM people care about what Doug says. |
#1360
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: doug wrote: No one is going to pay any attention to your delusions. You can get a good laugh from any university if you want but that is not what I think you are looking for. Well FR wasn't plagiarized and I don't need redefining logic to make it work. Well, you need redefining reality to make it work. It is very funny to watch you thrash and squirm when you have no idea what relativity actually says and how it is used today. You also have no clue that QM uses relativity and will not work with FR. But that would require you to study. "If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." -- Albert Einstein More lying on phil's part. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finite Relativism: Review Request | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 519 | September 25th 12 12:26 AM |
25% OFF -- Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 28th 09 10:54 AM |
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 4 | January 26th 09 10:00 PM |
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 12 | January 1st 09 04:20 PM |
BLAMING SPECIAL RELATIVITY? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 13th 08 01:05 PM |