|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1291
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkYQW...eature=related I didn't check out his video, that it did occur to me that he might be better off explaining is FR concept on YouTube, instead of getting bogged down trying to write and solve equations and suchlike, which does not appear to be Phil's strong suit. |
#1292
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Apr 28, 2:03*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote: * That does not agree with other distance measures * *http://www.mhhe.com/physsci/astronom...r23/23f23.html Well the distance are measured with the brightness of the stars or other various techniques. *The distance is then translated into the "light-year" blunder. FR says you should translate the light-years unit back to meters. FR is remarkably like Henri Wilson's theory. FR seems to say whatever Phil wants it to say at that moment in time. |
#1293
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: doug wrote: No, it is phil who is lying and being a fool in trying to run and hide from his ignorance. He does not even try any more to defend his stupidity. Phil knows that FR is a bad joke and that he is just one of the many cranks here who will never do anything useful. If you check out what is actually seen from the observed rotation curve of the Milky Way and surrounding galaxies they all follow curves as shown in the following page: http://astro.physics.uiowa.edu/~rlm/...20m atter.htm If you check out what FR follows: http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/ov-2.PNG When you put in fudge factor the theory can match anything. FR is still wrong right here on earth. I think you're in deep trouble enough. Your vague century of experiments can't save the day anymore. You are really down to just lying now. You do not know what the experiments were or what they showed. FR is wrong on all the predictions. If you were a scientist, and we know you are both too ignorant and lazy, you would look up all the experiments and see what your "theory" predicts. It has to agree with all of them. As of now, it agrees with none of them. You are a failure. No, you being stupid is not my problem. You can lie, you can run but you will never amount to anything. Phil is a loser. I never got my nose broke in any fight: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0xaCB2nLS0 |
#1294
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
When you put in fudge factor the theory can match anything. FR is still wrong right here on earth. The fudge factor just amplifies the curve but the curve remains the exact same. It's actually a good way of measuring the influence of Virgo on their galaxies. You are really down to just lying now. You do not know what the experiments were or what they showed. FR is wrong on all the predictions. If you were a scientist, and we know you are both too ignorant and lazy, you would look up all the experiments and see what your "theory" predicts. It has to agree with all of them. As of now, it agrees with FR uses physics law and is as precise as GR or better as far as the GPS is concerned. The square root still does not make any sense and so is the infinite amount of universes created on the fly. If you do not agree with FR then it does not matter because the US government will when they realize it will save money. If you do not like my publication then it doesn't change anything because everybody else will. none of them. You are a failure. Last time I heard comments like that was from a physics teacher when I was paying no attention. |
#1295
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Apr 29, 8:47 am, Phil Bouchard wrote:
FR uses physics law and is as precise as GR or better as far as the GPS is concerned. Still having those powerful delusions, Phil? |
#1296
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Apr 29, 7:47*am, Phil Bouchard wrote:
[...] none of them. You are a failure. Last time I heard comments like that was from a physics teacher when I was paying no attention. hahhaahahahahahahahahahaha Since then you have written a book about a subject you know nothing which nobody wants to buy. Winner! |
#1297
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote:
none of them. You are a failure. Last time I heard comments like that was from a physics teacher when I was paying no attention. Well, that certainly explains much. |
#1298
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
Phil Bouchard wrote: doug wrote: When you put in fudge factor the theory can match anything. FR is still wrong right here on earth. The fudge factor just amplifies the curve but the curve remains the exact same. It's actually a good way of measuring the influence of Virgo on their galaxies. No, it is just your delusion and numerology. You are really down to just lying now. You do not know what the experiments were or what they showed. FR is wrong on all the predictions. If you were a scientist, and we know you are both too ignorant and lazy, you would look up all the experiments and see what your "theory" predicts. It has to agree with all of them. As of now, it agrees with FR uses physics law and is as precise as GR or better as far as the GPS is concerned. The square root still does not make any sense and so is the infinite amount of universes created on the fly. You are just making up your nonsense. If you do not agree with FR then it does not matter because the US government will when they realize it will save money. That is an amazingly stupid statement. Since to have any hope of being right FR would have to exactly reproduce GR, then there are no changes necessary and nothing changes. I know you hope to get rich and famous off of this but the best you can hope for is to be listed on crank.net. If you do not like my publication then it doesn't change anything because everybody else will. Assuming they are looking for comedy or science fiction. Everything you have done is wrong. You started with the cannon delusion and then it went worse. none of them. You are a failure. Last time I heard comments like that was from a physics teacher when I was paying no attention. That is why you will remain stupid and a failure. |
#1299
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
doug wrote:
[...] That is an amazingly stupid statement. Since to have any hope of being right FR would have to exactly reproduce GR, then there are no changes necessary and nothing changes. I know you hope to get rich and famous off of this but the best you can hope for is to be listed on crank.net. I am not sure what you are attempting but this is certainly not science. FR uses physics laws, is more precise and does not require slow square roots cycles out of the CPU. I am not sure either why would the government trust blunders and pay more expensive high altitude satellites for it. [...] |
#1300
|
|||
|
|||
Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
On Apr 29, 12:11*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
doug wrote: [...] That is an amazingly stupid statement. Since to have any hope of being right FR would have to exactly reproduce GR, then there are no changes necessary and nothing changes. I know you hope to get rich and famous off of this but the best you can hope for is to be listed on crank.net. I am not sure what you are attempting but this is certainly not science. * FR uses physics laws, is more precise and does not require slow square roots cycles out of the CPU. WTF is this bull**** about square roots? *I am not sure either why would the government trust blunders and pay more expensive high altitude satellites for it. [...] Maybe it isn't wrong, you ****ing moron. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Finite Relativism: Review Request | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 519 | September 25th 12 12:26 AM |
25% OFF -- Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 28th 09 10:54 AM |
Finite Relativism and Dark Matter Disproof | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 4 | January 26th 09 10:00 PM |
GENERAL RELATIVITY WITHOUT SPECIAL RELATIVITY | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 12 | January 1st 09 04:20 PM |
BLAMING SPECIAL RELATIVITY? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 13th 08 01:05 PM |