A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The first perpetual motion machine



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 12th 08, 08:18 PM posted to sci.astro
gb[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,501
Default The first perpetual motion machine

www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/perp.htm
  #2  
Old March 12th 08, 08:52 PM posted to sci.astro
gb[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,501
Default The first perpetual motion machine

www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/perp.htm

So if energy can be made from gravity, then where does energy come
from.

Laws of conservation say energy cannot be made or destroyed.

The anwer comes that this energy is made of such entity which was not
created
or destroyed. A chemical reaction takes place. Motion was displaced
between
a chemical invalidating gravity (say water and an object lighter than
water in it).

A chemical process makes it chemical energy. This energy is not taken
from
a process that is in motion and thus taking energy from an object in
motion
would slow the motion of that object in return. It means that chemical
energy
can sustain motion through the establishment of chemical chains, in a
form a
reactor condition where energy is in the environment in it's most
basic forms:
water, fire, earth, wind, allowing our most basic achievement, the
perpetum mobile
of basisity, "the cheating of our existence" and the opinion of
scientists showing
their buttcracks.

  #3  
Old March 12th 08, 09:13 PM posted to sci.astro
gb[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,501
Default The first perpetual motion machine

On Mar 12, 2:52*pm, gb wrote:
www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/perp.htm


So if energy can be made from gravity, then where does energy come
from.

Laws of conservation say energy cannot be made or destroyed.

The anwer comes that this energy is made of such entity which was not
created
or destroyed. A chemical reaction takes place. Motion was displaced
between
a chemical invalidating gravity (say water and an object lighter than
water in it).

A chemical process makes it chemical energy. This energy is not taken
from
a process that is in motion and thus taking energy from an object in
motion
would slow the motion of that object in return. It means that chemical
energy
can sustain motion through the establishment of chemical chains, in a
form a
reactor condition where energy is in the environment in it's most
basic forms:
water, fire, earth, wind, allowing our most basic achievement, the
perpetum mobile
of basisity, "the cheating of our existence" and the opinion of
scientists showing
their buttcracks.


I presented the idea to a chemistry department at a University and
I was very surprised that they were very kind. But never mind that.
One must do what one must do to use words as one expects to be,
in this world.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Only perpetual motion describes dark matter gb[_3_] Astronomy Misc 2 December 25th 07 06:33 AM
Perpetual motion... gb6726 Astronomy Misc 5 November 12th 07 03:34 PM
Perpetual Motion on the Moon G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 16 May 4th 05 04:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.