|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Nothing causes the cosmos ( or 4-D gravity ) .. it “ just is ”.
On Nov 9, 11:28 pm, "Painius" wrote:
This power (gravity) that can make light bend... Sorry to go picayunish on this subject again, Paine. :-) But only an *accelerating* flow constitutes gravity, and it only affects mass. Light, being massless, is bent (or lensed) in traversing *any* flow, period, whether the flow is accelerating or not. This is why the excessive "gravitational" lensing of distant galaxies is `not` gravitational but simple *flow lensing* due to large scale, non- accelerating flows (or flows of low acceleration) of the intergalactic medium, which under the VSP called forth the invention of "dark matter" to account for the excessive lensing. ... A force that can be SO strong and powerful that it can contain electromagnetic energy when the escape velocity of an object (a BH) is higher than the speed of light. You go on being happy with quantum mechanics, Jeff. After all, its results have provided you with a living and furnishes all of us with UseNet and an interesting and fascinating way to interact with each other. We don't have to know how quantum mechanics works just to turn our computers on and type out our thoughts on our keyboards. And yet you must understand that some of us want more. Some of us want to work toward a clearer knowledge and understanding of physical reality. We don't want to settle for just knowing how to flick a switch. We want to know the details. We want to know what *causes* that great and enigmatic force of gravitation. If you don't mind. Or even if you do mind, thank you very much! And it all "just is". Don't that just take the cake? :-) |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Nothing causes the cosmos ( or 4-D gravity ) .. it “ just is ...
On Nov 10, 5:55 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Painius Source,and cause of the effects of gravitation is mother natures best kept secret. 70 years of trying to find the answer and no big light at the end of the tunnel. As a kid playing with my gyro,and watching it defy gravity by not toppling over when it was SPINNING was for me the big clue in my quest. Still is After 70 years I theorized the other 3 forces are created by gravity. That there are no such thing as a straight line. That if there was only one object in the universe it would be perfectly round,and need no spin. That sub micro quantum elementary particles and black holes are the same. Only difference is size and rate of spin. That casmir plates are showing us that space has wave energy,and has different size waves that make up its so called fabric. Reality is our brain is telling us we can not find as yet 93% of the universe. In this undetected big slice of the universe is what we need to find so we will have more clues,and finally know what gravity is. I will not be around by then,and that is sad,for all my spacetime thinking on gravity went to waste go figure TreBert PS Well I do have my equation The electrostatic force that is rather easily created for any given demonstration is a way stronger force than gravity. Positive and negative charged particles like to combine or join up with one another, somewhat like mater/antimatter. Perhaps it's a quantum racial policy or some kind of quantum faith-based thing. ~ BG |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Nothing causes the cosmos ( or 4-D gravity ) .. it “ just is ...
On Nov 10, 5:55*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
..Source, and cause of the effects of gravitation is mother natures best kept secret. But to the pure of heart, She parts her skirts to reveal her most secret Part. * g ..70 years of trying to find the answer and no big light at the end of the tunnel... *I will not be around by then, and that is sad, for all my spacetime thinking on gravity went to waste. Hells bells, Bert. You been readin' about it right here for 10, 11 years now. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Nothing causes the cosmos ( or 4-D gravity ) .. it “ just is ”.
"oldcoot" wrote in message
... On Nov 9, 11:28 pm, "Painius" wrote: This power (gravity) that can make light bend... Sorry to go picayunish on this subject again, Paine. :-) But only an *accelerating* flow constitutes gravity, and it only affects mass. Light, being massless, is bent (or lensed) in traversing *any* flow, period, whether the flow is accelerating or not. This is why the excessive "gravitational" lensing of distant galaxies is `not` gravitational but simple *flow lensing* due to large scale, non- accelerating flows (or flows of low acceleration) of the intergalactic medium, which under the VSP called forth the invention of "dark matter" to account for the excessive lensing. N i t p i c k e r g ... A force that can be SO strong and powerful that it can contain electromagnetic energy when the escape velocity of an object (a BH) is higher than the speed of light. You go on being happy with quantum mechanics, Jeff. After all, its results have provided you with a living and furnishes all of us with UseNet and an interesting and fascinating way to interact with each other. We don't have to know how quantum mechanics works just to turn our computers on and type out our thoughts on our keyboards. And yet you must understand that some of us want more. Some of us want to work toward a clearer knowledge and understanding of physical reality. We don't want to settle for just knowing how to flick a switch. We want to know the details. We want to know what *causes* that great and enigmatic force of gravitation. If you don't mind. Or even if you do mind, thank you very much! And it all "just is". Don't that just take the cake? :-) "Programmers"... sheesh. g I wonder if, after sitting for a time and creating great code, Jeff looks at his work and says, "There's no cause for this code... i t j u s t i s." ? happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Indelibly yours, Paine Ellsworth P.S.: "The cause is hidden. The effect is visible to all." Ovid P.P.S.: http://yummycake.secretsgolden.com http://garden-of-ebooks.blogspot.com http://painellsworth.net |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Before, treBert said nothing could slow down light.(light 1 speed)
Say, Saul, that would account for all the ****ty crap he writes ...
"Saul Levy" wrote in message ... Everyone has an ASS, BradBoi! lmfjao! I'm sitting on mine while you THINK with yours! Saul Levy On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 06:54:51 -0800 (PST), BradGuth wrote: On Nov 8, 5:14 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Cactus Saul Red shift has been in the books for a long time. Think Hubble Look through your telly Get your head out of your ass TreBert Other than his mouth, rabbi Saul doesn't have an ass. ~ BG |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Before, treBert said nothing could slow down light.(light 1 s...
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Nov 8, 5:08 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: BG like Cactus Saul you are not reading my posts clearly TreBert That's hard to do when we're not having beer for breakfast, and otherwise having beer as an IV drip. btw, you've never taken serious time away from that beer in order to read my stuff either. So stop bitching. He did read your illusionary drivel, GuthBall, and that's what drives him right back to drinking again. It's like that chicken and the egg thing ... |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Nothing causes the cosmos ( or 4-D gravity ) .. it“ just is ”.
Painius sed,
I wonder if, after sitting for a time and work and says, "There's no cause for this code... " It just is. " Heh. Causeless code. :-) |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Before, treBert said nothing could slow down light.(light 1 speed)
Yes, he does, Hagar! lmfjao!
Saul Levy On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 11:46:58 -0800, "Hagar" wrote: Say, Saul, that would account for all the ****ty crap he writes ... "Saul Levy" wrote in message .. . Everyone has an ASS, BradBoi! lmfjao! I'm sitting on mine while you THINK with yours! Saul Levy On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 06:54:51 -0800 (PST), BradGuth wrote: On Nov 8, 5:14 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Cactus Saul Red shift has been in the books for a long time. Think Hubble Look through your telly Get your head out of your ass TreBert Other than his mouth, rabbi Saul doesn't have an ass. ~ BG |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
A 4-D field has no true beginning or end, nothing caused it.
What does my code have to do with a 4-D field, gravity ?
My code is virtual, a 4-D field has a true “ Up ” and a true “ Time ”. Irregardless of what is or isn't known, a 4-D field is infinite in extent, the landscape/timescape is unbounded, static, motionless and randomness ― it's everything yet nothing. It has no true beginning or end, nothing caused it. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
A field is a field, not a “ void ”.
It's NOT, Jeff! lmfjao!
So you're another one who knows NOTHING about astronomy! That makes you part of the CROWD here! Saul Levy On 10 Nov 2008 01:40:52 GMT, Jeff?Relf wrote: And “ no ”, painius, I don't care to speculate about what causes supernovas ? maybe it's stars impacting stars. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
light inside a black hole | RichD | Astronomy Misc | 32 | September 16th 08 05:20 PM |
light in a black hole | RichD | Astronomy Misc | 5 | May 16th 08 09:25 PM |
Quasar light variability linked to black hole mass (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 3 | February 3rd 07 11:57 AM |
Quasar light variability linked to black hole mass (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | January 8th 07 11:42 PM |
Light inside a black hole? | Jan Panteltje | Astronomy Misc | 27 | January 8th 07 04:20 PM |