The universe is very shy

That's just from HUMIDITY, BEERTbrain! There are still large
telescopes available in Florida. The Crosby Observatory in Orlando
for example.

Quit making excuses!

Saul Levy


On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:28:42 -0400, (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:

Cactus Saul I had a small telescope but gave it away. Florida sky is
almost always milky. My Spin is in theory gives the reason for know
touching of matter in the micro realm,and that goes for the macro realm
as well. If my theory was not reality the universe would be in a
complete chaos state. TreBert

On Oct 28, 8:04*am, "Painius" wrote:
"oldcoot" wrote :

Bert wrote,

...no two objects are touching(planets
moons,asteroids comets etc. There is
a space between all that is.

Hey Bert. Here's a 'thought xperiment' for you. It's Mr. Fish again,
swinning deep in the ocean. This time he sees two bubbles that have come
out of solution. The two bubbles appear to be distinct, separated
entities. But are they not in fact just holes in the single, Primary
medium, the ocean? * * * * * * * * *
How might this parable apply to
atomic structure being seen as vacuoles or 'holes' in the singular,
Primary 'Ocean' of space?

All bubbles look alike.

That's the point i wuz tryin' to make regarding the oft-cited
embeddedness principle, taking the identical-ness of hydrogen for
instance. Every H atom in the universe, each an embedded 'bubble' in
the Ocean of space, 'looks like' every other H atom (we're speakin' of
neutral or ground state H of course). So does every other element
'look like' itself everywhere it occurs in the cosmos. The atomic
structure of each element beyond hydrogen is a "bubble complex" of a
very specific geometry. That geometry is the product of, and driven
by, the standing-wave field of space itself. A rough 2-dimensional
analogy can be seen here -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMIvA...eature=related

While this sonic analogy is 2-dimensional, it aptly illustrates the
idea of 3-dimensional atomic structure being shaped and driven by the
high-order, sub-Planckian-wavelength vibrational field of the SPED. As
we've cussed and dis-cussed so many times, the Periodic Table thus
represents the subharmonic, subsynchronous "notes" of that highly-
ordered vibrational continuum.
In the sonic analogy, it's interesting how the higher
the frequency, the more complex become the geometric forms of the
'bubbles'.. just as in the case of atomic structure.

Cactus saul Very hard to be outdoors at night. Lots of fire ants mounds
you can not see and 50 bites and your a dead star gazer. also mosquitos
will keep you from focusing. I have a room addition I made with a flat
roof to put a dome in revolving telescope,on,but I got lazy. I
have my picture(Hubble) scrape book that is so very great. Heard from my
email friend Sam that the Hubble is responding again,so I can added
pictures again. For me looking at a Hubble picture creates a 1,000 day
dreams Such as the Ring Nebular (M57) like Painius says The universe
he loves It has such great beauty TreBert

Where do you get the hard copies for your scrap book ?
Are you printing them yourself, or cutting from a magazine ?

P.S. I too have memories of Needles California.
Everytime I hear “ Hotel California � ( by the Eagles )
I think of driving in the desert at night.

When I see the binary suns set in Star Wars ( 1976 ),
I think of the huge red sun rising up over the hot eastern desert.

So? We have scorpions, javalina, gila monsters and skunks,
BEERTbrain! lmao!

Fire ants at a public observatory are no excuse old man!

Saul Levy


On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:21:17 -0400, (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:

Cactus saul Very hard to be outdoors at night. Lots of fire ants mounds
you can not see and 50 bites and your a dead star gazer. also mosquitos
will keep you from focusing. I have a room addition I made with a flat
roof to put a dome in revolving telescope,on,but I got lazy. I
have my picture(Hubble) scrape book that is so very great. Heard from my
email friend Sam that the Hubble is responding again,so I can added
pictures again. For me looking at a Hubble picture creates a 1,000 day
dreams Such as the Ring Nebular (M57) like Painius says The universe
he loves It has such great beauty TreBert

Jeff Pictures come from old mags. Reality is we only see about 35% of
the EM universe,and it NASA did nothing else the Hubble would be enough.
Hope to drive out to the Cape and sleep in the van,and watch the sun
rise up out of the ocean. When I was a kid sleeping on Revere Beach I
woke up to that spectacular view TreBert

Cactus Saul When I lived out by LA I went to Griffin observatory. Made
friend their,and it was always focus on Saturn for the public. Never saw
VENUS with is yellow clouds. I only know how to find the little and the
Big Dippers. go figure TreBert

You wrote:
“ Hope to drive out to the Cape and sleep in the van,
and watch the sun rise up out of the ocean.

When I was a kid sleeping on Revere Beach
I woke up to that spectacular view. �.

Good times, sounds like fun. Wealth is overrated.

You wrote:
“ If NASA did nothing else the Hubble would be enough. �.

Yes, but inner space is cool too, e.g. these diatoms ( 50 species ):
Images.NBII.GOV/RFemmer/D_med-res/Diatoms-50-species-3.jpg
( The National Biological Information Infrastructure )

And: “ www.Diatoms.CO.UK/iom_11.jpg �.
Where would be without diatoms ?

Venus is near the horizon except during daylight, BEERTbrain! Few
observatories use their big telescopes near the horizon. You need
large ladders to use them then. Someone could fall off.

Saul Levy


On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:42:19 -0400, (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:

Cactus Saul When I lived out by LA I went to Griffin observatory. Made
friend their,and it was always focus on Saturn for the public. Never saw
VENUS with is yellow clouds. I only know how to find the little and the
Big Dippers. go figure TreBert

On Oct 28, 5:14 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
There is no touching in the quantum realm,and that means there is no
touching in the macro realm. Nature creates in pairs and uses a time
laps to separate them. They carry a wave between them and wiggle it.
In our solar system no two objects are touching(planets moons,asteroids
comets etc. There is a space between all that is. Taken in size of
objects there is more space in the quantum realm micro than the macro
realm This is my latest theory. Woke up with it. Thoughts just jumped
in. that fits with my critical mass black hole theory,and why matter and
anti matter do not mix TreBert

Perhaps this universe is for other than dark matter 99.9999999999%
empty. In other words 1:1e12 empty, or given one solid part or atom
within a trillion empty parts or volumes, if that good.

At best the average density of our expanding universe is down to a few
atoms/m3, although it could become as shy as 0.1 atom/m3 unless dark
matter amounts to anything.

~ BG