|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Past Perfect, Future Misleading
Rand Simberg wrote: I have some more commentary on the Gehman report, and why we should not build "the" next generation launch system. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,95930,00.html Also near the end of this essay is this: "Let's start a new space age based on the American values of competition and individualism, rather than European (or even Soviet) ones of monopoly and bureaucracy." It seems to me there's free market capitalism flourishing in the European Economic Union, as well as along the Pacific Rim. I think there may be other entities besides the U.S. that could benefit from private space industry. There are some multi-national corporations that strengthen the economy of several nations. For example CFM International is both U.S. and French. Would they be able to compete for both U.S. incentives and European prizes? Hop http://clowder.net/hop/index.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Past Perfect, Future Misleading
"Hop David" wrote in message
... There are some multi-national corporations that strengthen the economy of several nations. For example CFM International is both U.S. and French. Would they be able to compete for both U.S. incentives and European prizes? CFM International--a joint venture of GE Aero Engines (GEAE) in the USA and SNECMA of France--is truly one of the luckiest companies in aviation history. A little history of CFM International: in 1969, SNECMA proposed the high-bypass M56 engine, intended for eventual growth versions of the Dassault Mercure airliner. The project languished for some time until SNECMA began negotiations with GEAE to co-develop the engine. Once the US Department of Commerce allowed GE to use the combustor core derived from the F101 engine used on the B-1 bomber on a commercial engine, GEAE and SNECMA formed the CFM International partnership to build the engine, now designated CFM56. Sales initially languished, with the only one application targeted: the main engine for the proposed YC-15 STOL transport for the US Air Force. When the YC-15 program ended in 1976, CFM International scrambled to find another customer for the CFM56 engine, and found it with a sucessful proposal to re-engine the DC-8 Super Sixty series planes with CFM56 engines. Cammacorp was formed, and by the late 1970's DC-8 Super Sixty planes were being re-engined with CFM56 engines; the modified DC-8's were designated DC-8 Super Seventy series. Around 1980, with the imposition of ICAO Stage III noise emission rules, Boeing looked for a new engine to make the 737 comply with Stage III rules. They found it in the CFM56, though CFM International had to redesign the engine (along with Boeing developing a new engine nacelle design) so the CFM56 could be fitted to the 737. The result was the highly-succesful 737-300/400/500 series, which became enormously popular in markets where strict noise regulations were in effect. Among the big customer for the 737-300 was a fast-rising airline named Southwest Airlines. At about the same time, the Airbus consortium decided to build a narrow-body airliner that would not only compete against Boeing, but also replace the many European-built airliners that were getting increasingly obselete. The result was the A320 Family of airliners in the 1983, with uprated versions of the CFM56 being the preferred engine choice. In the late 1980's, Airbus was developing the A340 long-range airliner. When the original IAE V2500 Superfan engine project was shelved CFM International was able to quickly develop a 30,000+ thrust version of the CFM56 engine, which saved the A340 program. In the 1990's, Boeing developed the Next-Generation 737, which was to compete against the A320 Family of planes and to replace the many 727-200's in US airline service. Naturally, Boeing turned to the CFM56 in an uprated version, and it is the exclusive engine for the 737NG. Today, with the rapid rise of low-cost carriers, there will be major sales of the A320 Family and Next-Generation 737 airliners over the next seven years. And CFM International will be there will power the vast majority of the planes being sold to low-cost carriers. -- Raymond Chuang Mountain View, CA USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Past Perfect, Future Misleading | Hop David | Space Science Misc | 67 | September 11th 03 07:25 PM |
Past Perfect, Future Misleading | John Ordover | Space Shuttle | 5 | September 1st 03 08:25 PM |
Past Perfect, Future Misleading | Al Jackson | Space Shuttle | 2 | August 29th 03 02:00 PM |
Past Perfect, Future Misleading | Kevin Willoughby | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 29th 03 04:00 AM |
Past Perfect, Future Misleading | Buck | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 28th 03 10:29 PM |