|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
July 8th 06, 02:27 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
10^-43 Seconds Before,and After BB
The events that took place in this quantum spacetime were the cosmos
greatest of all,and this will be natures greatest mystery. It was a spacetime that man will never know the laws that govern these quantum effects. A Planck time when not even photons radiated out.. We have theories now as to the later time when quarks and anti-quarks dominated the era. The spacetime of 10-^43 I will call the "ID" (inaccessible part of the cosmos) It will be humankinds "libido" When all else is known and we have TOE. "ID" will be in back of every mind,and always be a part of the brain's psychic energy Bert 
|
|
#2
July 8th 06, 02:42 PM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks
|
|||
|
|||
|
10^-43 Seconds Before,and After BB
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
The events that took place in this quantum spacetime were the cosmos greatest of all,and this will be natures greatest mystery. It was a spacetime that man will never know the laws that govern these quantum effects. A Planck time when not even photons radiated out.. We have theories now as to the later time when quarks and anti-quarks dominated the era. The spacetime of 10-^43 I will call the "ID" (inaccessible part of the cosmos) It will be humankinds "libido" When all else is known and we have TOE. "ID" will be in back of every mind,and always be a part of the brain's psychic energy Bert I think you need to take your WebTV show on the road to sci.physics, Beeert. -- COOSN-266-06-39716 Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005 Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion", as designated by Brad Guth "And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even *call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?" -- Painsnuh the Lamer "Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on their own, and the races are related (brown)." -- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity "Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of the establishment." -- Double-A on technology development
|
|
#3
July 8th 06, 02:42 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
10^-43 Seconds Before,and After BB
|
|
#4
July 8th 06, 09:03 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
10^-43 Seconds Before,and After BB
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... The events that took place in this quantum spacetime were the cosmos greatest of all,and this will be natures greatest mystery. It was a spacetime that man will never know the laws that govern these quantum effects. A Planck time when not even photons radiated out.. We have theories now as to the later time when quarks and anti-quarks dominated the era. The spacetime of 10-^43 I will call the "ID" (inaccessible part of the cosmos) It will be humankinds "libido" When all else is known and we have TOE. "ID" will be in back of every mind,and always be a part of the brain's psychic energy Bert Beeert, once again you manage to display your cluelessness of the subject matter. You are referring to quarks and anti-quarks, but you forgot that a mere 250 years ago, it was thought that the atom was the smallest component particle of matter. Then, to everyone's surprise, it was found that the atoms consisted of smaller particles, namely the Protons and Neutrons of the nucleus and the orbiting Electrons. Then it was discovered that even these particles consisted of sub-components, oddly name quarks and they come in 6 flavors. Trumpeting humanity's typical arrogance, you so much as declare that the "Singularity" prior to the BB consisted of quarks. If you took all the matter in the visible Universe and broke it down to its quark components, removed all empty spaces between them, you'd still wind up with a ball of matter the size of an average Galaxy. To achieve a singularity, matter must be broken down into, yet unknown, smaller components and probably by two, three or more magnitudes. The only way that can happen is via a huge Black Hole with a volume of millions of Galaxies, which, by its sheer size and gravitation, can crush matter well past the quark boundary and beyond. When that final component is reached and no further sub-particles exist, you then have the Singularity. The collapse initiated by the massive gravitational effects of the former Black Hole will hit that final impenetrable barrier of resistance and rebound. Since both matter and anti-matter are created, a very brief annihilation period will declare the winner, which will continue to be known as a new Big Bang. Within the first 10-^30 the quarks will reassemble, followed by the assembly of the basic atomic sub-components and finally the beginning of the new Universe with its 75% Hydrogen and 25% Helium composition. And that's the way the cookie crumbles Beeert.
|
|
#5
July 8th 06, 10:45 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
10^-43 Seconds Before,and After BB
Hagar (The horrible) Let me ask your crumbling flaky brain a question on
quarks since you rambled on about them out of Google Why are they composed of factional charges? Why is their weighs not evenly divided?. Do you try to find the answer why the bottom quark is a 1,000 times heavier than an electron,or that the top quark is 30,000 times still heavier? I could even ask you "why is the top quark so much heavier than all other particles?" When I am asked I stop and think. Asking you to answer them is not possible,for the answers are not yet in Google. I'm thinking of buying a parrot,and I'll call it "Hagar" It fits Bert
|
|
#6
July 8th 06, 10:56 PM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks
|
|||
|
|||
|
10^-43 Seconds Before,and After BB
|
|
#7
July 8th 06, 11:24 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
10^-43 Seconds Before,and After BB
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Hagar (The horrible) Let me ask your crumbling flaky brain a question on quarks since you rambled on about them out of Google Why are they composed of factional charges? Why is their weighs not evenly divided?. Do you try to find the answer why the bottom quark is a 1,000 times heavier than an electron,or that the top quark is 30,000 times still heavier? I could even ask you "why is the top quark so much heavier than all other particles?" When I am asked I stop and think. Asking you to answer them is not possible,for the answers are not yet in Google. I'm thinking of buying a parrot,and I'll call it "Hagar" It fits Bert The point I attempted to make obviously went clear over your head, so I won't repeat it, since you wouldn't get it the second time around either. Good luck with that Hagar parrot, faggot. I have a seagull that does nothing but eat, **** and squawks a lot of unintelligible gibberish, just like you. I think I'll name it BBEEEERT
|
|
#8
July 9th 06, 12:22 AM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
10^-43 Seconds Before,and After BB
Art Deco wrote: G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: The events that took place in this quantum spacetime were the cosmos greatest of all,and this will be natures greatest mystery. It was a spacetime that man will never know the laws that govern these quantum effects. A Planck time when not even photons radiated out.. We have theories now as to the later time when quarks and anti-quarks dominated the era. The spacetime of 10-^43 I will call the "ID" (inaccessible part of the cosmos) It will be humankinds "libido" When all else is known and we have TOE. "ID" will be in back of every mind,and always be a part of the brain's psychic energy Bert I think you need to take your WebTV show on the road to sci.physics, Beeert. -- Bert has been posting to sci.physics for years. Where have you been? Double-A
|
|
#9
July 9th 06, 12:27 AM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks
|
|||
|
|||
|
10^-43 Seconds Before,and After BB
|
|
#10
July 9th 06, 01:36 PM
posted to alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
10^-43 Seconds Before,and After BB
Time that is very short relates in Planck lengths,and long time fits
only in our macro world. Short time lengths make quantum effects mystifying. Very long lengths of time makes for fudge thinking. Time lengths mean nothing to nature. Time is very important only to humankind. I'm big also on time laps,for my very fast pictures prove it is reality. Things do not move the moment a force is applied. Bert
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The foam did not do it | columbiaaccidentinvestigation | Space Shuttle | 25 | March 16th 06 10:40 PM |
| Royal Astronomical Society statement on the proposed abolition ofleap seconds (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 22nd 05 07:28 PM |
| when will our planet stop rotating? | meat n potatoes | Amateur Astronomy | 61 | March 27th 04 12:50 PM |
| Three Questions for Challenger's 18th Anniversary | john_thomas_maxson | Space Shuttle | 88 | February 21st 04 01:32 AM |
| Mars Colony hours, minutes, seconds | Fidcal | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 2nd 04 04:00 PM |
Linear Mode
