A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

When Did the Pentagon Get Attacked Exactly?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 25th 13, 11:40 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default When Did the Pentagon Get Attacked Exactly?

On Sunday, November 24, 2013 11:29:04 PM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:
"Tony Dragon" wrote in message

Rocky uses his SOP again.



And that was to reply to a bunch of post and then point out there is no
consistency in the 9:37:46 am "Official Pentagon Attack time?"

And while I'm here I saw another good video today and it points out the only
way a street by the World Trade Center could have been damaged the way it
was damaged is if something exploded below it. G

1000 Words
http://youtu.be/apIotREAqnE

Rocky


Coconspirators like Tony are required to be here, because they serve no other purpose.
  #2  
Old November 25th 13, 01:00 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Dean Markley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 515
Default When Did the Pentagon Get Attacked Exactly?

On Monday, November 25, 2013 6:40:07 AM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:
On Sunday, November 24, 2013 11:29:04 PM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:

"Tony Dragon" wrote in message




Rocky uses his SOP again.






And that was to reply to a bunch of post and then point out there is no


consistency in the 9:37:46 am "Official Pentagon Attack time?"




And while I'm here I saw another good video today and it points out the only


way a street by the World Trade Center could have been damaged the way it


was damaged is if something exploded below it. G




1000 Words


http://youtu.be/apIotREAqnE




Rocky




Coconspirators like Tony are required to be here, because they serve no other purpose.


Are you suggesting Tony was involved in the 9/11 attacks?
Are you suggesting that you have information that you've not given to the authorities?
Are you suggesting that there is a huge conspiracy with tens of thousands of people involved?
  #3  
Old November 25th 13, 02:18 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default When Did the Pentagon Get Attacked Exactly?

On Monday, November 25, 2013 5:00:55 AM UTC-8, Dean Markley wrote:
On Monday, November 25, 2013 6:40:07 AM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:

On Sunday, November 24, 2013 11:29:04 PM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:




"Tony Dragon" wrote in message








Rocky uses his SOP again.












And that was to reply to a bunch of post and then point out there is no




consistency in the 9:37:46 am "Official Pentagon Attack time?"








And while I'm here I saw another good video today and it points out the only




way a street by the World Trade Center could have been damaged the way it




was damaged is if something exploded below it. G








1000 Words




http://youtu.be/apIotREAqnE








Rocky








Coconspirators like Tony are required to be here, because they serve no other purpose.




Are you suggesting Tony was involved in the 9/11 attacks?

Are you suggesting that you have information that you've not given to the authorities?

Are you suggesting that there is a huge conspiracy with tens of thousands of people involved?


Yes, no, no.

It only takes a few individual in order to deceive millions of others, especially when 99.9999% of others are deathly afraid of their government, or simply too stupid (aka indoctrinated) to know otherwise.


  #4  
Old November 25th 13, 08:28 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default When Did the Pentagon Get Attacked Exactly?

On Monday, November 25, 2013 10:42:58 AM UTC-8, Dean Markley wrote:

Are you suggesting that a YouTube clip is proof? LMAO! Maybe proof that you are just another run of the mill conspiracy nut.


Your oligarch and Bilderberg run MIC essentially did the very same thing, except their live televised plus media hyped and otherwise carefully orchestrated version initially killed more than 3000 of us, injured thousands of others, and subsequently having terminated well over a million others in addition to continued destabilizing of nations, as well as their having lost track of previously having spent 5+ trillion dollars, as still MIA to boot. Of course the all-inclusive 9/11 hit to our economy has likely exceeded another 12+ trillion and counting, thus putting us in the hole by at least 17 trillion as well as causing considerable global inflation (especially with hydrocarbon market speculators and insider manipulations in order to extort the highest price per barrel).

As it stands, we don't even have the reserves for infrastructure repairs and upgrades, outside of allowing our MIC and multiple agencies to continue as is.


  #5  
Old November 26th 13, 12:38 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Dean Markley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 515
Default When Did the Pentagon Get Attacked Exactly?

On Monday, November 25, 2013 1:56:49 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
"Dean Markley" wrote in message

...

snip



Are you suggesting that a YouTube clip is proof? LMAO! Maybe proof that


you are just another run of the mill conspiracy nut.




Boy Dean, how quickly you forget the fact that you are the conspiracy nut

believing a conspiracy of 19 alleged hijackers instead of seeing one

verisimilitude.



And if you want to cry YouTube because you can't face the facts that you

were lied to then I'll state the following is not a youtube clip incase you

can't tell on your own: First the URL then the Summary from that URL



http://physics911.net/missingwings/



The main burden of this article has been to demonstrate that the debris

found outside the Pentagon is inconsistent with the impact of a Boeing 757

or any aircraft of comparable dimensions. In particular, in the absence of

some agency (possibly unknown to physical science) that removed the wings,

there is no way to avoid the conclusion that the wings (and therefore the

aircraft) were never present in the first place. In this case, no Boeing 757

struck the Pentagon building on the morning of September 11, 2001.



And here is another one I just found today:



We Have Seen the Enemy -- It Is US

http://physics911.net/pdf/lindauer-w...-the-enemy.pdf



Rocky


Are you suggesting that citing a conspiracy nut website such as physics911.net is PROOF?

Are you suggesting that you can't understand facts?

Are you suggesting that the following is a government cover up:

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.asp
  #6  
Old November 26th 13, 12:40 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Dean Markley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 515
Default When Did the Pentagon Get Attacked Exactly?

On Monday, November 25, 2013 3:28:08 PM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:
On Monday, November 25, 2013 10:42:58 AM UTC-8, Dean Markley wrote:



Are you suggesting that a YouTube clip is proof? LMAO! Maybe proof that you are just another run of the mill conspiracy nut.




Your oligarch and Bilderberg run MIC essentially did the very same thing, except their live televised plus media hyped and otherwise carefully orchestrated version initially killed more than 3000 of us, injured thousands of others, and subsequently having terminated well over a million others in addition to continued destabilizing of nations, as well as their having lost track of previously having spent 5+ trillion dollars, as still MIA to boot.. Of course the all-inclusive 9/11 hit to our economy has likely exceeded another 12+ trillion and counting, thus putting us in the hole by at least 17 trillion as well as causing considerable global inflation (especially with hydrocarbon market speculators and insider manipulations in order to extort the highest price per barrel).



As it stands, we don't even have the reserves for infrastructure repairs and upgrades, outside of allowing our MIC and multiple agencies to continue as is.


You forgot to add that the moon is paramagnetic and physically dark.
  #7  
Old November 26th 13, 01:53 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default When Did the Pentagon Get Attacked Exactly?

On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:40:21 AM UTC-8, Dean Markley wrote:
On Monday, November 25, 2013 3:28:08 PM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:

On Monday, November 25, 2013 10:42:58 AM UTC-8, Dean Markley wrote:








Are you suggesting that a YouTube clip is proof? LMAO! Maybe proof that you are just another run of the mill conspiracy nut.








Your oligarch and Bilderberg run MIC essentially did the very same thing, except their live televised plus media hyped and otherwise carefully orchestrated version initially killed more than 3000 of us, injured thousands of others, and subsequently having terminated well over a million others in addition to continued destabilizing of nations, as well as their having lost track of previously having spent 5+ trillion dollars, as still MIA to boot. Of course the all-inclusive 9/11 hit to our economy has likely exceeded another 12+ trillion and counting, thus putting us in the hole by at least 17 trillion as well as causing considerable global inflation (especially with hydrocarbon market speculators and insider manipulations in order to extort the highest price per barrel).








As it stands, we don't even have the reserves for infrastructure repairs and upgrades, outside of allowing our MIC and multiple agencies to continue as is.



You forgot to add that the moon is paramagnetic and physically dark.


All of the moon rock found on Earth (teratonnes of the stuff) is physically dark as coal and paramagnetic), with an average density of 3.5+ g/cm3.

Of course you and others of your kind really don't seem to care, even if there's more easily accessible gold, platinum, carbonado plus numerous other light and heavy and rare elements than all of Earth, and best of all there are no tree-huggers nor any other environmentalism issues standing in the way of exploiting every last kg of the stuff.

Using solar derived energy in order to turn moon rock into a plasma means getting access to those elements (including oxygen and water) is unrestricted and nearly unlimited. Don't suppose you'd have any use of any solid tonne of carbonado, or as many tonnes as you'd like (such as for creating tools, ICs and unlimited length of continuous fiber space tethers).
  #8  
Old November 26th 13, 03:12 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Dean Markley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 515
Default When Did the Pentagon Get Attacked Exactly?

On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:53:12 AM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:40:21 AM UTC-8, Dean Markley wrote:

On Monday, November 25, 2013 3:28:08 PM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:




On Monday, November 25, 2013 10:42:58 AM UTC-8, Dean Markley wrote:
















Are you suggesting that a YouTube clip is proof? LMAO! Maybe proof that you are just another run of the mill conspiracy nut.
















Your oligarch and Bilderberg run MIC essentially did the very same thing, except their live televised plus media hyped and otherwise carefully orchestrated version initially killed more than 3000 of us, injured thousands of others, and subsequently having terminated well over a million others in addition to continued destabilizing of nations, as well as their having lost track of previously having spent 5+ trillion dollars, as still MIA to boot. Of course the all-inclusive 9/11 hit to our economy has likely exceeded another 12+ trillion and counting, thus putting us in the hole by at least 17 trillion as well as causing considerable global inflation (especially with hydrocarbon market speculators and insider manipulations in order to extort the highest price per barrel).
















As it stands, we don't even have the reserves for infrastructure repairs and upgrades, outside of allowing our MIC and multiple agencies to continue as is.






You forgot to add that the moon is paramagnetic and physically dark.




All of the moon rock found on Earth (teratonnes of the stuff) is physically dark as coal and paramagnetic), with an average density of 3.5+ g/cm3.



Of course you and others of your kind really don't seem to care, even if there's more easily accessible gold, platinum, carbonado plus numerous other light and heavy and rare elements than all of Earth, and best of all there are no tree-huggers nor any other environmentalism issues standing in the way of exploiting every last kg of the stuff.



Using solar derived energy in order to turn moon rock into a plasma means getting access to those elements (including oxygen and water) is unrestricted and nearly unlimited. Don't suppose you'd have any use of any solid tonne of carbonado, or as many tonnes as you'd like (such as for creating tools, ICs and unlimited length of continuous fiber space tethers).


You've had your head handed to you before regarding the "carbonado".
  #9  
Old November 26th 13, 03:53 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default When Did the Pentagon Get Attacked Exactly?

On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:12:12 AM UTC-8, Dean Markley wrote:
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:53:12 AM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:

On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:40:21 AM UTC-8, Dean Markley wrote:




On Monday, November 25, 2013 3:28:08 PM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:








On Monday, November 25, 2013 10:42:58 AM UTC-8, Dean Markley wrote:
































Are you suggesting that a YouTube clip is proof? LMAO! Maybe proof that you are just another run of the mill conspiracy nut.
































Your oligarch and Bilderberg run MIC essentially did the very same thing, except their live televised plus media hyped and otherwise carefully orchestrated version initially killed more than 3000 of us, injured thousands of others, and subsequently having terminated well over a million others in addition to continued destabilizing of nations, as well as their having lost track of previously having spent 5+ trillion dollars, as still MIA to boot. Of course the all-inclusive 9/11 hit to our economy has likely exceeded another 12+ trillion and counting, thus putting us in the hole by at least 17 trillion as well as causing considerable global inflation (especially with hydrocarbon market speculators and insider manipulations in order to extort the highest price per barrel).
































As it stands, we don't even have the reserves for infrastructure repairs and upgrades, outside of allowing our MIC and multiple agencies to continue as is.












You forgot to add that the moon is paramagnetic and physically dark.








All of the moon rock found on Earth (teratonnes of the stuff) is physically dark as coal and paramagnetic), with an average density of 3.5+ g/cm3.








Of course you and others of your kind really don't seem to care, even if there's more easily accessible gold, platinum, carbonado plus numerous other light and heavy and rare elements than all of Earth, and best of all there are no tree-huggers nor any other environmentalism issues standing in the way of exploiting every last kg of the stuff.








Using solar derived energy in order to turn moon rock into a plasma means getting access to those elements (including oxygen and water) is unrestricted and nearly unlimited. Don't suppose you'd have any use of any solid tonne of carbonado, or as many tonnes as you'd like (such as for creating tools, ICs and unlimited length of continuous fiber space tethers).




You've had your head handed to you before regarding the "carbonado".


Are you suggesting that carbonado can not be created in space?
  #10  
Old November 26th 13, 07:30 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Dean Markley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 515
Default When Did the Pentagon Get Attacked Exactly?

On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:53:12 AM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:12:12 AM UTC-8, Dean Markley wrote:

On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:53:12 AM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:




On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:40:21 AM UTC-8, Dean Markley wrote:








On Monday, November 25, 2013 3:28:08 PM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:
















On Monday, November 25, 2013 10:42:58 AM UTC-8, Dean Markley wrote:
































































Are you suggesting that a YouTube clip is proof? LMAO! Maybe proof that you are just another run of the mill conspiracy nut.
































































Your oligarch and Bilderberg run MIC essentially did the very same thing, except their live televised plus media hyped and otherwise carefully orchestrated version initially killed more than 3000 of us, injured thousands of others, and subsequently having terminated well over a million others in addition to continued destabilizing of nations, as well as their having lost track of previously having spent 5+ trillion dollars, as still MIA to boot. Of course the all-inclusive 9/11 hit to our economy has likely exceeded another 12+ trillion and counting, thus putting us in the hole by at least 17 trillion as well as causing considerable global inflation (especially with hydrocarbon market speculators and insider manipulations in order to extort the highest price per barrel).
































































As it stands, we don't even have the reserves for infrastructure repairs and upgrades, outside of allowing our MIC and multiple agencies to continue as is.
























You forgot to add that the moon is paramagnetic and physically dark..
















All of the moon rock found on Earth (teratonnes of the stuff) is physically dark as coal and paramagnetic), with an average density of 3.5+ g/cm3.
















Of course you and others of your kind really don't seem to care, even if there's more easily accessible gold, platinum, carbonado plus numerous other light and heavy and rare elements than all of Earth, and best of all there are no tree-huggers nor any other environmentalism issues standing in the way of exploiting every last kg of the stuff.
















Using solar derived energy in order to turn moon rock into a plasma means getting access to those elements (including oxygen and water) is unrestricted and nearly unlimited. Don't suppose you'd have any use of any solid tonne of carbonado, or as many tonnes as you'd like (such as for creating tools, ICs and unlimited length of continuous fiber space tethers).








You've had your head handed to you before regarding the "carbonado".




Are you suggesting that carbonado can not be created in space?


Are you suggesting that carbonado is common on the moon?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trayvon was doped-up when he attacked Zimmerman HVAC[_2_] Misc 1 May 18th 12 02:28 PM
pISRAELIS ATTACKED IN MADRID, SPAIN Warhol[_1_] Misc 0 July 21st 10 04:42 AM
All cards exhausted, Iran will be attacked in 3 weeks. gb6726 Astronomy Misc 9 November 2nd 07 04:07 PM
Pluto's status attacked Raving Loonie Misc 22 August 16th 06 10:20 AM
Bush is a psycho regime, all say shouldn't have attacked Iraq [email protected] Astronomy Misc 1 June 15th 06 04:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.