A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

I traveled INFINITE miles by car this year ( 2009 ).



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 1st 10, 12:17 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Semmalon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default I traveled INFINITE miles by car this year ( 2009 ).

Geez! you're a senile schleez!
I'm going to stop picking on you, putz.
It's no fun being senile.
And scientists better start giving a damn, or they'll wind up like Shelley's
Victor Frankenstein.
People will storm the CERN and burn it down if explanations they can
understand and BELIEVE aren't forthcoming.
And I don't give a schit 'n schinola what you think of my science history,
you schmuck! lmfjao!

Hey! how come YOU'RE not laughing YOUR fat Jewish ass off anymore?

"Saul Levy" wrote in message
...
Magnetic hasn't been heard from for some time now!

The Earth is STILL HERE!

How many understood RELATIVITY just after Einstein published it?

Basicly, scientists don't GIVE A ****ING DAMN if IDIOTS understand
their work or not! Either it's TRUE or it's not.

Your knowledge of SCIENCE HISTORY IS STUPID TOO!

Saul Levy


On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:00:42 -0500, "Semmalon"
wrote:

Not so much WHAT he said as WHEN he said it, nah?
1920 wasn't it?
Tell you what, let's put that awful statement in context a little:

More careful reflection teaches us, however, that the
special theory of relativity does not compel us to deny
ether. We may assume the existence of an ether; only
we must give up ascribing a definite state of motion to
it, i.e. we must by abstraction take from it the last
mechanical characteristic which Lorentz had still left it.
We shall see later that this point of view, the
conceivability of which I shall at once endeavour to
make more intelligible by a somewhat halting
comparison, is justified by the results of the general
theory of relativity.



S e m m a
Be well and come... be welcome!



The CERN has great potential, yes, but their main problems will be the
public outcry, and the great difficulty they have in explaining both what
they're trying to do, and they're interpretations of the test results.
They might be "right as rain", but if they gain understanding, but cannot
explain it plainly, then what good is it?



--
S e m m a
Be well and come... be welcome!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFP with extended deadline of Mar. 23, 2009: The 2009 InternationalConference on Scientific Computing (CSC'09), USA, July 13-16, 2009 A. M. G. Solo Astronomy Misc 0 March 17th 09 01:14 AM
Astronomy Year 2009 Starlord Misc 3 October 31st 06 11:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.