|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Building the better mousetr-...er, engine
Henry Spencer wrote:
"Current engines are (in my opinion) *nowhere* *near* fundamental limits on thrust/weight, even without magic materials like nanotube composites. Improving that means lighter engines for the same thrust, or more thrust in the same package." I just realized that I understand most of the different engine cooling and pumping concepts, how rocket engines work, etc., but I don't know what variables affect the mass of an engine, and how strong of an influence they are. So, where is there room for thrust/weight ratio improvement in engines? Or rather, what are the variables that would affect the mass of an engine of a given thrust rating? Mike Miller, Materials Engineer |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Building the better mousetr-...er, engine
"Mike Miller" wrote in message om... Henry Spencer wrote: "Current engines are (in my opinion) *nowhere* *near* fundamental limits on thrust/weight, even without magic materials like nanotube composites. Improving that means lighter engines for the same thrust, or more thrust in the same package." I just realized that I understand most of the different engine cooling and pumping concepts, how rocket engines work, etc., but I don't know what variables affect the mass of an engine, and how strong of an influence they are. So, where is there room for thrust/weight ratio improvement in engines? Or rather, what are the variables that would affect the mass of an engine of a given thrust rating? Mike Miller, Materials Engineer A complete redesign of the propellant handling system would be a good start. About 2/3rds of the engine mass is not thrust chamber. That mass is a maze of plumbing, turbine and pump rotor support systems, valves, and controlers for all of it. The thrust chamber itself is almost an afterthought in terms of mass. Redesigning the feed system would require going back to first principles. Not "what is the most efficient turbine possible?", but "why does the propellant not want to enter the thrust chamber?". How can we get the propellant from the 30 psi tank to the 3,000 psi chamber without all these subsystems? Not "what is the most efficient way to build cooling passages?"but "how can we build a thrust system with a minimum of cooling system complexity and mass?". Doing this without waving the laws of physics can be quite entertaining. The solutions I have worked out require some independant evaluation before rising to the level of newsgroup fodder. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engineers test the first engine for NASA's return to flight mission | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 1 | July 19th 04 06:45 PM |
NASA reaches main engine propulsion milestone | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | January 23rd 04 05:53 PM |
SMART-1 Ion Engine Fired Successfully | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | October 1st 03 06:05 PM |
Ion Engine Records No Tuneups, No Problems | Ron Baalke | Technology | 3 | July 31st 03 10:03 AM |
Nuclear rocket engine 11B91-IR-100 from Russia | Dr.Ph. Ponomarenko A.V. | Technology | 0 | July 12th 03 09:45 AM |