|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How good is good enough?
I recently got an Orion 127 mm Mak-Cas telescope, and although the images
seem to be pretty good, I was wondering are there any tests for determining if a given telescope is performing as well as it should? How sharp a point should a star focus to? It seems to depend on the brightness of the star too. At high (150X) magnification, I do see little rings around some stars: are these the Airy circles? I'm new at this so any pointers would be appreciated. Albert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How good is good enough?
At high (150X) magnification, I do see little rings around some stars:
are these the Airy circles? I'm new at this so any pointers would be appreciated. Hi: Yes. As for how to tell "how good"? The star test is one way. Unfortunately, it can be hard for novices to interpret and may be amgiguous when used with a scope that moves the primary mirror to focus. How else? Home much detail does the cooled and collimated scope show on planets? Again, it may be difficult for a novice to evaluate. Best bet, if you're concerned, grab a member of the local club who knows what to look for. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How good is good enough?
At high (150X) magnification, I do see little rings around some stars:
are these the Airy circles? I'm new at this so any pointers would be appreciated. Hi: Yes. As for how to tell "how good"? The star test is one way. Unfortunately, it can be hard for novices to interpret and may be amgiguous when used with a scope that moves the primary mirror to focus. How else? Home much detail does the cooled and collimated scope show on planets? Again, it may be difficult for a novice to evaluate. Best bet, if you're concerned, grab a member of the local club who knows what to look for. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How good is good enough?
Albert,
When everything is right, stars should appear as pinpoints...crisp and sharp. If you bought your scope from Orion recently, you should telephone them for assistance. You will find that these people are very helpful and not afraid to take a faulty item back to keep the customer satisfied. On a Cas telescope, what you describe could be the fault of proper collimation. While I'm not familiar with a Mak-Cas, I do believe that there are means of collimating this scope. I could be wrong, so check your owners manual to see if collimation is doable on your scope and for instructions on how to do it. Either that or call Orion. Al wrote in message ... I recently got an Orion 127 mm Mak-Cas telescope, and although the images seem to be pretty good, I was wondering are there any tests for determining if a given telescope is performing as well as it should? How sharp a point should a star focus to? It seems to depend on the brightness of the star too. At high (150X) magnification, I do see little rings around some stars: are these the Airy circles? I'm new at this so any pointers would be appreciated. Albert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How good is good enough?
Albert,
When everything is right, stars should appear as pinpoints...crisp and sharp. If you bought your scope from Orion recently, you should telephone them for assistance. You will find that these people are very helpful and not afraid to take a faulty item back to keep the customer satisfied. On a Cas telescope, what you describe could be the fault of proper collimation. While I'm not familiar with a Mak-Cas, I do believe that there are means of collimating this scope. I could be wrong, so check your owners manual to see if collimation is doable on your scope and for instructions on how to do it. Either that or call Orion. Al wrote in message ... I recently got an Orion 127 mm Mak-Cas telescope, and although the images seem to be pretty good, I was wondering are there any tests for determining if a given telescope is performing as well as it should? How sharp a point should a star focus to? It seems to depend on the brightness of the star too. At high (150X) magnification, I do see little rings around some stars: are these the Airy circles? I'm new at this so any pointers would be appreciated. Albert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
How good is good enough?
Albert,
When everything is right, stars should appear as pinpoints...crisp and sharp. If you bought your scope from Orion recently, you should telephone them for assistance.... On a Cas telescope, what you describe could be the fault of proper collimation..... Sounds to me like the scope is in good collimation: From the Original Post: "At high (150X) magnification, I do see little rings around some stars:are these the Airy circles? " Rather than being a sign that the scope is out of collimation, those rings around the stars are nice diffraction rings and a sign that the scope is indeed in pretty good collimation.... jon |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How good is good enough?
Albert,
When everything is right, stars should appear as pinpoints...crisp and sharp. If you bought your scope from Orion recently, you should telephone them for assistance.... On a Cas telescope, what you describe could be the fault of proper collimation..... Sounds to me like the scope is in good collimation: From the Original Post: "At high (150X) magnification, I do see little rings around some stars:are these the Airy circles? " Rather than being a sign that the scope is out of collimation, those rings around the stars are nice diffraction rings and a sign that the scope is indeed in pretty good collimation.... jon |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
How good is good enough?
Albert posted:
I recently got an Orion 127 mm Mak-Cas telescope, and although the images seem to be pretty good, I was wondering are there any tests for determining if a given telescope is performing as well as it should? How sharp a point should a star focus to? It seems to depend on the brightness of the star too. At high (150X) magnification, I do see little rings around some stars: are these the Airy circles? I'm new at this so any pointers would be appreciated. The rings are known as "diffraction rings" and surround the tiny disk of light which is known as the "Airy Disk". These features are caused by the interference of light that is being gathered and focused by the telescope, and are quite normal, generally becoming easily visible at magnifications of 30x per inch of aperture and above (150x in the case of the 127mm Mak-Cass). I have used a 127mm Orion Mak-Cass, and generally, it is a pretty good instrument overall. Clear skies to you. -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 11th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 18-23, 2004, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
How good is good enough?
Albert posted:
I recently got an Orion 127 mm Mak-Cas telescope, and although the images seem to be pretty good, I was wondering are there any tests for determining if a given telescope is performing as well as it should? How sharp a point should a star focus to? It seems to depend on the brightness of the star too. At high (150X) magnification, I do see little rings around some stars: are these the Airy circles? I'm new at this so any pointers would be appreciated. The rings are known as "diffraction rings" and surround the tiny disk of light which is known as the "Airy Disk". These features are caused by the interference of light that is being gathered and focused by the telescope, and are quite normal, generally becoming easily visible at magnifications of 30x per inch of aperture and above (150x in the case of the 127mm Mak-Cass). I have used a 127mm Orion Mak-Cass, and generally, it is a pretty good instrument overall. Clear skies to you. -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 11th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 18-23, 2004, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
How good is good enough?
@hpl.hp.com () wrote in message ...
I recently got an Orion 127 mm Mak-Cas telescope, and although the images seem to be pretty good, I was wondering are there any tests for determining if a given telescope is performing as well as it should? How sharp a point should a star focus to? It seems to depend on the brightness of the star too. At high (150X) magnification, I do see little rings around some stars: are these the Airy circles? I'm new at this so any pointers would be appreciated. Don't laugh, but daytime testing can reveal glaring deficiencies in a scope. One of my "tricks" after reassembling a scope is to attempt to read the label and serial number of a microwave dish about 1/4 mile away from my back yard. You could do the same for gear mounted on distant power or telephone poles. I recently did this with my Orion Apex 90 after I flocked its baffle tube and did a rough indoors collimation and, by golly, the digits in the serial number were crystal clear and I only needed to perform a minor additional tweak later that day (actually night :-) with a star test. Another test is examining leaves on a distant tree and see if you can detect the veins in the leaves and, hopefully, the absence of any blue/purple color fringing around the leaf's edges; this is also a good test for refractors. FWIW, the Apex/StarMax 127 (I have one, too) is overall a very good performer and there are some exquisite astrophotos taken using them that people have posted to the "OSAO" Yahoo group. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why Teams of Co-Operating Robots Make Good Planetary Explorers | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 31st 04 06:01 PM |
Requirements / process to become a shuttle astronaut? | Dan Huizenga | Space Shuttle | 11 | November 14th 03 07:33 AM |
f/5 or f/8 newtonian? | Patrick | Amateur Astronomy | 52 | October 6th 03 12:46 AM |
Any good resources on astronomy/astrology? | Paul Schlyter | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | September 15th 03 04:20 PM |