|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#841
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... And yes, I type quickly, but Volume I of the Hearings is 300 some pages. I do not have the time to type all of that. You don't have to. All you have to do is provide a *complete, proper cite, including page number*. You are hardly the only person who has a copy. |
#842
|
|||
|
|||
Well, my apologies, but I'm astonished that you sounded like (in that
message) you had no real clue if the FBI was involved. How can you not know that? And yes, I type quickly, but Volume I of the Hearings is 300 some pages. I do not have the time to type all of that. When you get a copy you'll be free to read all you like. Ya know, there is a little method we historians use to handle this problem. We cite the page numbers. Or block quote a paragraph depending on what's going on. Someone doesn't say "Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto called for a violent overthrow of the capitalists" and then proceed to quote the whole damn thing but a historian worth a damn will at least note a page #, or a quote or something to prove their point. A couple months ago I noted on this NG (or sci.space.shuttle, forgot which) a statistic for the probability of a fatal shuttle accident featured in Jenkins' "History of the National Space Transportation System" and failed to note the page. When asked for the page my reaction wasn't "**** off, find it yourself" to these people as it was a legitimate demand as I was the one trying to prove a point, just as YOU are the one trying to prove points about Apollo 1. I failed to find the statistic immedietly (as I was looking at 6 AM after pulling an all-nighter on a paper) but did eventually find the page number, quoted it and noted it to the newsgroup. If one is stating an arguement in becomes that individual's responsbility to provide proof of the arguement. Any historian worth a damn would provide evidence that could be examined and analyzed by other historians, any engineer or scientist worth a damn would provide hard data that could be analyzed by other engineers or scientists. People aren't rolling over and accepting what you say just because you say it? Tough. Be ready to back up what you claim or don't bother saying it because nobody here is going to believe one damned word you say until you show us the goods. And nobody will believe as wild a claim as that the Apollo 1 crew was murdered without hard, solid evidence in the form of documents that can be referenced and data that can be analyzed. -A.L. |
#843
|
|||
|
|||
rk wrote:
: You state that they are simulating : power but call them "'LOAD' simulators." In her case, a Load Simulator is one of those inflatable male love dolls that has a hand pump attached to the fake penis. HTSI The Fried Pistachio -OO- -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#844
|
|||
|
|||
The Fried Pistachio wrote in message . ..
rk wrote: : You state that they are simulating : power but call them "'LOAD' simulators." In her case, a Load Simulator is one of those inflatable male love dolls that has a hand pump attached to the fake penis. HTSI The Fried Pistachio -OO- -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- And someone was complaining about John Maxson's post? What about THIS stupidity? |
#845
|
|||
|
|||
"MasterShrink" wrote in message
... Well, my apologies, but I'm astonished that you sounded like (in that message) you had no real clue if the FBI was involved. How can you not know that? And yes, I type quickly, but Volume I of the Hearings is 300 some pages. I do not have the time to type all of that. When you get a copy you'll be free to read all you like. People aren't rolling over and accepting what you say just because you say it? Tough. Be ready to back up what you claim or don't bother saying it because nobody here is going to believe one damned word you say until you show us the goods. And nobody will believe as wild a claim as that the Apollo 1 crew was murdered without hard, solid evidence in the form of documents that can be referenced and data that can be analyzed. -A.L. Well said, sir. I sometimes think that Ms. Wyss must be getting compensated for the trolling she's doing. I can't see a real reason for it otherwise, since she has offered *zero* documentable proof of her claims, and counters with invective when she's pressed for it. Alas, since she's now in my *bozo bin*, I won't see a reply to my comments .... James |
#846
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message m... And someone was complaining about John Maxson's post? What about THIS stupidity? If you know your post is stupid, why post? |
#847
|
|||
|
|||
"James G. Joyce" wrote in message link.net...
"MasterShrink" wrote in message ... Well, my apologies, but I'm astonished that you sounded like (in that message) you had no real clue if the FBI was involved. How can you not know that? And yes, I type quickly, but Volume I of the Hearings is 300 some pages. I do not have the time to type all of that. When you get a copy you'll be free to read all you like. People aren't rolling over and accepting what you say just because you say it? Tough. Be ready to back up what you claim or don't bother saying it because nobody here is going to believe one damned word you say until you show us the goods. And nobody will believe as wild a claim as that the Apollo 1 crew was murdered without hard, solid evidence in the form of documents that can be referenced and data that can be analyzed. -A.L. Well said, sir. I sometimes think that Ms. Wyss must be getting compensated for the trolling she's doing. I can't see a real reason for it otherwise, since she has offered *zero* documentable proof of her claims, and counters with invective when she's pressed for it. Alas, since she's now in my *bozo bin*, I won't see a reply to my comments ... James Well, A.L., given that you are yet another one with a propensity for made-up identities, why is it everyone wants to know what's "up my sleeve", as it were? I have not made any attempt to hide my identity whatsoever. So just WHO lacks credibility here? LaDonna |
#848
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" lacks credibility here Duh! |
#849
|
|||
|
|||
Well, A.L., given that you are yet another one with a propensity for
made-up identities, why is it everyone wants to know what's "up my sleeve", as it were? I have not made any attempt to hide my identity whatsoever. So just WHO lacks credibility here? LaDonna .... A.L....my initials...how I sign off most posts, e-mails etc I write. Andrew Lotosky. Hardly a made up identity I assure you. Any more bright ideas? -A.L. |
#850
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|