|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo
One Giant Lie For Mankind
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it and judge for yourselves. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo
On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 6:03:17 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
One Giant Lie For Mankind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it and judge for yourselves. You dimwit, do you actually consider this to be "proof"? This guy is a conspiracy theorist and total whackjob. Do you subscribe to "Bart's Bible Blessings" too? Here is my evidence against this fellow dimwit of yours... http://www.clavius.org/bibfunny1.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Funn...ay_to_the_Moon "Jim McDade, writing in The Birmingham News, characterized A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon as "full of falsehoods, innuendo, strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and premature conclusions." According to McDade, the "only thing new and weird" in the film is that the claim that video views of Earth were actually filmed through a small hole to give the impression that Apollo 11 was not in low Earth orbit. "Bart has misinterpreted things that are immediately obvious to anyone who has extensively read Apollo history and documentation or anyone who has ever been inside an Apollo Command Module or accurate mockup," says McDade." You are really a full-fledged dumb****, Bast, and unfortunately, you are proud of it! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo
palsing wrote: On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 6:03:17 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: One Giant Lie For Mankind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it and judge for yourselves. You dimwit, do you actually consider this to be "proof"? This guy is a conspiracy theorist and total whackjob. Do you subscribe to "Bart's Bible Blessings" too? Here is my evidence against this fellow dimwit of yours... http://www.clavius.org/bibfunny1.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Funn...ay_to_the_Moon "Jim McDade, writing in The Birmingham News, characterized A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon as "full of falsehoods, innuendo, strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and premature conclusions." According to McDade, the "only thing new and weird" in the film is that the claim that video views of Earth were actually filmed through a small hole to give the impression that Apollo 11 was not in low Earth orbit. "Bart has misinterpreted things that are immediately obvious to anyone who has extensively read Apollo history and documentation or anyone who has ever been inside an Apollo Command Module or accurate mockup," says McDade." You are really a full-fledged dumb****, Bast, and unfortunately, you are proud of it! giggle Wikipedia ? Next time try Rechel Madcow at MSNBC, or CNN for your source,.....their fake news is so much funnier. You will even love their Global warming, or Trump Ruskie collusion spy, fiction stories. Although I do highly recommend "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon " And you can view it here,... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo
"Bast" wrote in message ...
One Giant Lie For Mankind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it and judge for yourselves. *** OK, one more time, you demented chromosome challenged weirdo: Radio signals are directional. Pilots use the directional beacon of a radio station near the airport at which they want to land and it displays the direction, in degrees, on the screen of the direction finder. Now the Russians would have loved nothing more than to expose the "hoax", however, when they monitored the transmissions between the astronauts and Ground control, they discovered that they beacon came from the same spot on the Moon for the duration of each Moon landing. Not from the orbiter, where the signal direction constantly moved and even disappeared when the orbiter went to the "Dark Side". The beacons are so accurate, that the Russkies could even determine the exact location of each landing. Secondly, on one of the landings the astronauts placed a reflector plate to bounce back radar signals sent from Earth. The transit times of the radar signals were measured and gave scientists the exact distance of the Moon from Earth, which allowed them to calculate the rate of recession, which is about 1.5 inches per year. The reflector plate took quite some time to adjust for maximum effectiveness and that could have only been done by manual finetuning made by astronauts on the Moon. So please, Bast, spare us any more of your ridiculous drivel about the "Moon Landing Hoax" ... you are not well. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo
On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 8:25:28 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
palsing wrote: On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 6:03:17 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: One Giant Lie For Mankind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it and judge for yourselves. You dimwit, do you actually consider this to be "proof"? This guy is a conspiracy theorist and total whackjob. Do you subscribe to "Bart's Bible Blessings" too? Here is my evidence against this fellow dimwit of yours... http://www.clavius.org/bibfunny1.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Funn...ay_to_the_Moon "Jim McDade, writing in The Birmingham News, characterized A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon as "full of falsehoods, innuendo, strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and premature conclusions." According to McDade, the "only thing new and weird" in the film is that the claim that video views of Earth were actually filmed through a small hole to give the impression that Apollo 11 was not in low Earth orbit. "Bart has misinterpreted things that are immediately obvious to anyone who has extensively read Apollo history and documentation or anyone who has ever been inside an Apollo Command Module or accurate mockup," says McDade." You are really a full-fledged dumb****, Bast, and unfortunately, you are proud of it! giggle Wikipedia ? Next time try Rechel Madcow at MSNBC, or CNN for your source,.....their fake news is so much funnier. You will even love their Global warming, or Trump Ruskie collusion spy, fiction stories. Although I do highly recommend "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon " And you can view it here,... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4 I watch all launching first hand.They were 100% true.Than GOPer Mafia killed JFK and we got 43 years of stuttles thanks to Nixon Annenberg and Kissinger.During those 43 years Walter Annenberg stole 2 billion each year.86 billion WOW so sad o true.Bert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo
Herbert Glazier wrote: On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 8:25:28 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: palsing wrote: On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 6:03:17 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: One Giant Lie For Mankind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it and judge for yourselves. You dimwit, do you actually consider this to be "proof"? This guy is a conspiracy theorist and total whackjob. Do you subscribe to "Bart's Bible Blessings" too? Here is my evidence against this fellow dimwit of yours... http://www.clavius.org/bibfunny1.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Funn...ay_to_the_Moon "Jim McDade, writing in The Birmingham News, characterized A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon as "full of falsehoods, innuendo, strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and premature conclusions." According to McDade, the "only thing new and weird" in the film is that the claim that video views of Earth were actually filmed through a small hole to give the impression that Apollo 11 was not in low Earth orbit. "Bart has misinterpreted things that are immediately obvious to anyone who has extensively read Apollo history and documentation or anyone who has ever been inside an Apollo Command Module or accurate mockup," says McDade." You are really a full-fledged dumb****, Bast, and unfortunately, you are proud of it! giggle Wikipedia ? Next time try Rechel Madcow at MSNBC, or CNN for your source,.....their fake news is so much funnier. You will even love their Global warming, or Trump Ruskie collusion spy, fiction stories. Although I do highly recommend "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon " And you can view it here,... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4 I watch all launching first hand.They were 100% true.Than GOPer Mafia killed JFK and we got 43 years of stuttles thanks to Nixon Annenberg and Kissinger.During those 43 years Walter Annenberg stole 2 billion each year.86 billion WOW so sad o true.Bert No one is ever claiming there were no Apollo rocket launches. But you would know that if you took the time to watch ANY of the videos. However there is a big difference between putting a rocket into low earth orbit for a week, than going to the moon and back. Watch the videos, THINK, then come to your own conclusions. But don't tell me something happened, just because you were told it did. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo
Hägar wrote: "Bast" wrote in message ... One Giant Lie For Mankind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it and judge for yourselves. *** OK, one more time, you demented chromosome challenged weirdo: Radio signals are directional. Pilots use the directional beacon of a radio station near the airport at which they want to land and it displays the direction, in degrees, on the screen of the direction finder. Now the Russians would have loved nothing more than to expose the "hoax", however, when they monitored the transmissions between the astronauts and Ground control, they discovered that they beacon came from the same spot on the Moon for the duration of each Moon landing. Not from the orbiter, where the signal direction constantly moved and even disappeared when the orbiter went to the "Dark Side". The beacons are so accurate, that the Russkies could even determine the exact location of each landing. Secondly, on one of the landings the astronauts placed a reflector plate to bounce back radar signals sent from Earth. The transit times of the radar signals were measured and gave scientists the exact distance of the Moon from Earth, which allowed them to calculate the rate of recession, which is about 1.5 inches per year. The reflector plate took quite some time to adjust for maximum effectiveness and that could have only been done by manual finetuning made by astronauts on the Moon. So please, Bast, spare us any more of your ridiculous drivel about the "Moon Landing Hoax" ... you are not well. Hagar, how many times do I have to tell you that they were bouncing lasers off the moon. long before Apollo. And even if they did need this magical reflector pad you claim, that is little more than 2 feet square. It was claimed just to have prisms that reflect from every direction. Much llike reflective tape on a yellow construction vest, or even a movie screen What makes you think it could not have just been sent there by an unmanned lander ? Do you have any idea how wide even a laser would diverge going to the moon and back. ANSWER - A lot more than 2 FEET And radio / TV signals have been bounced off satelites since the 1950's So tell me why that same unmanned lander the put your magical reflctor on the moon, could not also be reflecting radio signals from earth. NO MEN NEEDED |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo
On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 12:11:07 PM UTC-7, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 8:25:28 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: palsing wrote: On Sunday, June 9, 2019 at 6:03:17 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: One Giant Lie For Mankind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1oTrENQ-rQ Specially posted for Hagar & Palsing, But all are invited to watch it and judge for yourselves. You dimwit, do you actually consider this to be "proof"? This guy is a conspiracy theorist and total whackjob. Do you subscribe to "Bart's Bible Blessings" too? Here is my evidence against this fellow dimwit of yours... http://www.clavius.org/bibfunny1.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Funn...ay_to_the_Moon "Jim McDade, writing in The Birmingham News, characterized A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon as "full of falsehoods, innuendo, strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and premature conclusions." According to McDade, the "only thing new and weird" in the film is that the claim that video views of Earth were actually filmed through a small hole to give the impression that Apollo 11 was not in low Earth orbit. "Bart has misinterpreted things that are immediately obvious to anyone who has extensively read Apollo history and documentation or anyone who has ever been inside an Apollo Command Module or accurate mockup," says McDade." You are really a full-fledged dumb****, Bast, and unfortunately, you are proud of it! giggle Wikipedia ? Next time try Rechel Madcow at MSNBC, or CNN for your source,.....their fake news is so much funnier. You will even love their Global warming, or Trump Ruskie collusion spy, fiction stories. Although I do highly recommend "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon " And you can view it here,... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4 I watch all launching first hand.They were 100% true.Than GOPer Mafia killed JFK and we got 43 years of stuttles thanks to Nixon Annenberg and Kissinger.During those 43 years Walter Annenberg stole 2 billion each year.86 billion WOW so sad o true.Bert Yes, I watched too live on my black and white television while Neil Armstrong took his firs tentative step onto the surface of the Moon! How could they fake that? With all the delayed and cancelled launches along the line, Hollywood would have scripted it much better! During those Shuttle years, you never heard the mainline media complain about the stalled space program, did you? Double-A |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo
On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 12:37:27 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote:
Do you have any idea how wide even a laser would diverge going to the moon and back. ANSWER - A lot more than 2 FEET Are you incapable of doing your own research? Do you learn everything you know from bloggers? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_...ing_experiment "At the Moon's surface, the beam is about 6.5 kilometers (4.0 mi) wide and scientists liken the task of aiming the beam to using a rifle to hit a moving dime 3 kilometers (1.9 mi) away. The reflected light is too weak to see with the human eye. Out of 1017 photons aimed at the reflector, only one is received back on Earth, even under good conditions. They can be identified as originating from the laser because the laser is highly monochromatic. This is one of the most precise distance measurements ever made... and is equivalent in accuracy to determining the distance between Los Angeles and New York to within 0.25 mm (0.01 in)." Sure, you think little of Wikipedia, but their articles are heavily referenced and are highly respected sources of information, in general... https://www.livescience.com/7946-wik...-accurate.html "Well-sourced articles written according to Wikipedia guidelines should have citations listed at the bottom of each page, with links to other information sources. This means that savvy readers can use Wikipedia as an information hub to follow the link trail to more expert or authoritative websites, and students can likewise find useful primary sources through Wikipedia." How many of your precious bloggers give such references? Hmmmmm? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
More proof NASA hoaxed Apollo
palsing wrote: On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 12:37:27 PM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Do you have any idea how wide even a laser would diverge going to the moon and back. ANSWER - A lot more than 2 FEET Are you incapable of doing your own research? Do you learn everything you know from bloggers? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_...ing_experiment "At the Moon's surface, the beam is about 6.5 kilometers (4.0 mi) wide and scientists liken the task of aiming the beam to using a rifle to hit a moving dime 3 kilometers (1.9 mi) away. The reflected light is too weak to see with the human eye. Out of 1017 photons aimed at the reflector, only one is received back on Earth, even under good conditions. They can be identified as originating from the laser because the laser is highly monochromatic. This is one of the most precise distance measurements ever made... and is equivalent in accuracy to determining the distance between Los Angeles and New York to within 0.25 mm (0.01 in)." Sure, you think little of Wikipedia, but their articles are heavily referenced and are highly respected sources of information, in general... https://www.livescience.com/7946-wik...-accurate.html "Well-sourced articles written according to Wikipedia guidelines should have citations listed at the bottom of each page, with links to other information sources. This means that savvy readers can use Wikipedia as an information hub to follow the link trail to more expert or authoritative websites, and students can likewise find useful primary sources through Wikipedia." How many of your precious bloggers give such references? Hmmmmm? Wikipedia again ? giggle They NEVER LEARN |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Proof that Apollo 11 happened | mick | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | September 5th 07 08:08 PM |
Was the Apollo moon landing faked? HERE'S PROOF | Brian Pemberton | Space Shuttle | 0 | November 18th 03 04:06 PM |