|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
X-No Archive:Yes On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 03:43:47 GMT, *
wrote: On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:39:44 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote: In our last episode, , the lovely and talented * broadcast on alt.politics: A sustainable, containable, fusion reaction has already been built -- the technology is suppressed. Exactly as quacks and cranks always say. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6807354 http://www.climatetechnology.gov/lib...ions-2-2-1.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power None of these links lead to anything that suggests that sustainable fusion reactions have been achieved. Yes they do. Reading comprehension problem noted. Widdershins Roll over and play smart. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
X-No Archive:Yes On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:32:19 +0200, "Laura"
wrote: Nowhere on those websites does it say that it's existing and applicable technology. In fact, one of them clearly states "being developed" about some of the most crucial elements needed to make it work - most notably the fusion itself! The rest deals with theory, which is perfectly sound. The fact remains that, so far, the only practical fusion device possible is the thermonuclear bomb. By the way, why does all of this matter to you, anyway? I thought you said that you, along with a select few others, will be whisked away by aliens, and the rest of us are going to die horribly when we're clobbered by an asteroid in 2012. If that's true, what difference does it make what we use as an energy source for the next 8 years? Laura, Laura, Laura. It has probably come to your notice that Alexa isn't quite playing with a full deck. IOW she's a sandwich shy of a picnic, a few bricks shy of a load, not the brightest bulb in the GE lineup, not the sharpest knife in the drawer. To wit: She's a loony! Widdershins Skepticult Member #159-904378-909 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:35:42 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote: X-No Archive:Yes On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:39:44 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote: In our last episode, , the lovely and talented * broadcast on alt.politics: A sustainable, containable, fusion reaction has already been built -- the technology is suppressed. Exactly as quacks and cranks always say. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6807354 http://www.climatetechnology.gov/lib...ions-2-2-1.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power None of these links lead to anything that suggests that sustainable fusion reactions have been achieved. Didn't I say that just a little while ago? Yes, and yo and your sock puppets are still lying. Widdershins Dark Prince of the Kook Central Cabal (TINKCC) Evil Overlord blah, blah, blah You get the idea. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:36:41 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote: X-No Archive:Yes On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 03:43:47 GMT, * wrote: On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:39:44 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote: In our last episode, , the lovely and talented * broadcast on alt.politics: A sustainable, containable, fusion reaction has already been built -- the technology is suppressed. Exactly as quacks and cranks always say. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6807354 http://www.climatetechnology.gov/lib...ions-2-2-1.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power None of these links lead to anything that suggests that sustainable fusion reactions have been achieved. Yes they do. Reading comprehension problem noted. Nope. Widdershins Roll over and play smart. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:44:32 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote: Alexa isn't quite playing with a full deck Slander noted. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
In our last episode,
, the lovely and talented House Widdershins broadcast on alt.politics: X-No Archive:Yes On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:32:19 +0200, "Laura" wrote: Nowhere on those websites does it say that it's existing and applicable technology. In fact, one of them clearly states "being developed" about some of the most crucial elements needed to make it work - most notably the fusion itself! The rest deals with theory, which is perfectly sound. The fact remains that, so far, the only practical fusion device possible is the thermonuclear bomb. By the way, why does all of this matter to you, anyway? I thought you said that you, along with a select few others, will be whisked away by aliens, and the rest of us are going to die horribly when we're clobbered by an asteroid in 2012. If that's true, what difference does it make what we use as an energy source for the next 8 years? Laura, Laura, Laura. It has probably come to your notice that Alexa isn't quite playing with a full deck. IOW she's a sandwich shy of a picnic, a few bricks shy of a load, not the brightest bulb in the GE lineup, not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Do you mean to say her elevator doesn't go all the way to the top? She's one taco short of a fiesta plate? She's skipped a cog? She's off her trolley? She's got a screw loose? The lights are on but nobody's home? She's out to lunch? Mad as a monkey on a trike? Not hitting on all cylinders? She hasn't got both oars in the water? There are no phones on the planet Pluto? She is living in cloud cuckoo land? The wheel is spinning but the hampster's dead? To wit: She's a loony! Which one of us the sock puppet? Widdershins Skepticult Member #159-904378-909 -- Lars Eighner -finger for geek code- http://www.io.com/~eighner/ "With a heavy dose of fear and violence, and a lot of money for projects, I think we can convince these people that we are here to help them" -- Lt. Col. Nathan Sassaman |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:04:46 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:
Laura, Laura, Laura. It has probably come to your notice that Alexa isn't quite playing with a full deck. IOW she's a sandwich shy of a picnic, a few bricks shy of a load, not the brightest bulb in the GE lineup, not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Do you mean to say her elevator doesn't go all the way to the top? She's one taco short of a fiesta plate? She's skipped a cog? She's off her trolley? She's got a screw loose? The lights are on but nobody's home? She's out to lunch? Mad as a monkey on a trike? Not hitting on all cylinders? She hasn't got both oars in the water? There are no phones on the planet Pluto? She is living in cloud cuckoo land? The wheel is spinning but the hampster's dead? And no one but a gullible idiot would believe that. It's obvious even to the village idiot that fusion technology is suppressed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak US citizens know the US government lies, no one believes them. What is the horrible truth, is that the US government has been supplanted by a fascist regime of defense contractors, arms and drug dealers. They've resorted to fascism to maintain power: http://www.omnicenter.org/warpeacecollection/facism.htm The 14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism Free Inquiry http://www.secularhumanism.org/fi/ Spring 2003; 5-11-03 Dr. Lawrence Britt has examined the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia) and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each: 1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays. 2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc. 3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc. 4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized. 5. Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution. 6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to (sic) media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common. 7. Obsession with National Security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses. 8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions. 9. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite. 10. Labor Power is Suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed. 11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked. 12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations. 13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders. 14. Fraudulent Elections - Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
In article ,
wrote: On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:04:46 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote: Laura, Laura, Laura. It has probably come to your notice that Alexa isn't quite playing with a full deck. IOW she's a sandwich shy of a picnic, a few bricks shy of a load, not the brightest bulb in the GE lineup, not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Do you mean to say her elevator doesn't go all the way to the top? She's one taco short of a fiesta plate? She's skipped a cog? She's off her trolley? She's got a screw loose? The lights are on but nobody's home? She's out to lunch? Mad as a monkey on a trike? Not hitting on all cylinders? She hasn't got both oars in the water? There are no phones on the planet Pluto? She is living in cloud cuckoo land? The wheel is spinning but the hampster's dead? And no one but a gullible idiot would believe that. It's obvious even to the village idiot that fusion technology is suppressed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak US citizens know the US government lies, no one believes them. What is the horrible truth, is that the US government has been supplanted by a fascist regime of defense contractors, arms and drug dealers. They've resorted to fascism to maintain power: http://www.omnicenter.org/warpeacecollection/facism.htm The 14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism Free Inquiry http://www.secularhumanism.org/fi/ Spring 2003; 5-11-03 Dr. Lawrence Britt has examined the fascist regimes of Hitler FLUSH Screed du jour post #4. Godwin invoked again. -=-=-=-=- Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, Gubmint Disinformation Agent, and "Dr. Green" Sockpuppet. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
Let's suppose, just for a second, that someone did indeed supress usable
(more juice out than in) fusion reactor technology (after all, there are functional fusion reactors around already). Why would they do such a thing? Surely having a 50-year head-start on all the other fusion reactor projects would allow them to get loads of patents out and make a mint on selling the tech to power companies? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Suppresed Technology: Fusion Reactor
"House Widdershins" wrote in message ... X-No Archive:Yes On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:32:19 +0200, "Laura" wrote: Nowhere on those websites does it say that it's existing and applicable technology. In fact, one of them clearly states "being developed" about some of the most crucial elements needed to make it work - most notably the fusion itself! The rest deals with theory, which is perfectly sound. The fact remains that, so far, the only practical fusion device possible is the thermonuclear bomb. By the way, why does all of this matter to you, anyway? I thought you said that you, along with a select few others, will be whisked away by aliens, and the rest of us are going to die horribly when we're clobbered by an asteroid in 2012. If that's true, what difference does it make what we use as an energy source for the next 8 years? Laura, Laura, Laura. It has probably come to your notice that Alexa isn't quite playing with a full deck. IOW she's a sandwich shy of a picnic, a few bricks shy of a load, not the brightest bulb in the GE lineup, not the sharpest knife in the drawer. To wit: She's a loony! Oh hush! You're spoiling it! :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Our future as a species - Fermi Paradox revisted - Where they all are | william mook | Policy | 157 | November 19th 03 12:19 AM |
N by M Body Fusion | Charles Cagle | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 31st 03 11:30 PM |
New UK technology will make the first global X-ray map of the Moon(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 22nd 03 02:09 AM |