PLANETARY EXPANSION VS EARTH EXPANSION ( PE vs EE)

On 13 août, 08:11, malibu wrote:
On Aug 12, 8:58 pm, "Cj" wrote:

"Ye Old One" wrote If the Earth , or any other planet,
is increasing in mass then supply

the measurements that prove it.

Put up or shut up.

If the earth has been growing in mass over time the orbit of the planet must
have altered quite significantly over the centuries. There are
archaeological data that suggest there has been no measurable change in the
earth's orbit for the last 4000 years. Howcum?

Cj

What data?

How does 4000 years compare to when the dinosaurs were here?
Are the error bars in your 'measurements' smaller than that
percentage?

Do you really imagine an animal as big as T. Rex could run around on
two big kangaroo-type feet in today's gravity?
(They're fudging that these days- they're saying, "Oh, T. Rex didn't
chase things- it was a carrion-eater.' Or whatever.)

Gravity is gravity, man. We're too fat to fly. But Pterodactyls were
LARGE. 40 feet long. And they flew. Is 40 feet longer than fat
little us?

There used to be 10 other kinds of elephants, including mammoths,
and they were all larger than the two kinds left on Earth.

There used to be cats way bigger- Sabre-toothed tigers.

There used to be birds with 20 foot wingspans.

Measure 'those' skeletons. They exist. They're the proof.

Put it together where it makes sense, man.

We're NOT the center of the
Universe.

We're NOT the only life-bearing planet in the Universe.

We're NOT the most intelligent people to ever exist
in the Universe- Hell, we're not even the smartest to live on Earth.
The Mayans had way more together.
The pyramids were built by people who knew more than us.
Stonehenge was built by people who knew more than us.

Dark matter. Bull****.
Dark Energy. What the ****?
Black holes. Ha ha ha ha.
Big bang? Idiots.

Believe today's crap if you want.

Goodbye rain forests.
Goodbye animals.
Goodbye, mankind.

John

Congratulations John, you are asking the right questions.
You are correct indeed and the Jurassic Park film is an impossibility
with today conditions on Earth.
These huge animals could not simply move around without their spines
breaking up under the weight.
Any idea as to the reason of such changes in the conditions of life on
Earth ?
Incidentally such evidence destroys that poor Darwin fraud 's
pretensions of survival of the fittest

Don above is establishing a very sad balance sheet of the situation,
pointing out the pretension of the ultra specialised so-called
scientists to remain the leaders in a search for truth. The scientific
method is obviously at fault, and now as well as in the past it has
never brought people closer to real understanding, and has never
indeed done anything but maintain in force concepts worth for the bin
on the one hand, and prevent innovative ideas to come to the front.

I am afraid the answer to that puzzle and indeed quadrature of the
circle is elsewhere. Man as it is unable to apprehend reality & past
an exceptional learning capacity evident in early years of his life
( the Thyroid phase of endocrinal development ) by the time he reaches
adulthood has become saturated with the undigested remains of
metabolic process clogging indeed his thinking ability. At the time
when authority is bestowed to those who have reached through their
"learning" the power to lead others, we sadly can observe their
waning ability at doing so by the obvious degeneracy of their
biological envelope, saturated more & more by electrolytes, calcified
endlessly carbonates, the free & locked water of their "Milieu
Intérieur" lost as observed through the wrinkles & flask muscles
structures slowing their movements until death ends the degeneracy....
and these ignorant unable to even master their own system are promoted
by the sensational press as the leading lights of the world allegedly
giving the directions to others.

The study of History of Mankind indicates on the other hand that
advance in Knowledge are always the feat of exceptional men emerging
through the mass, with an innate love of Truth and an exceptional
potential to apprehend it.
Science is just another sect really, and those low-forehead tunnel-
visions narrow-minded scientists of now can be compared indeed to the
Mollards, Rabbids & Preeest of some other fraudulous allegedly
religious sects promoting since more than a 1000 years a chronological
account of World history which they imposed on Humanity.

Now without going further and trying to answer questions which needs
to bring in new concept in physics, like PE & EE which is NOT a
particular case, why not answer some simpler questions like :

1) The evidence of NON Glaciations eras
2) The evidence of NON erosion of intrusive & extrusive rock formation
by water & glaciers

Hey ?

jpturcaud