A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sphere-cone reentry vehicles



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 26th 08, 04:39 PM posted to sci.space.history
Neil Gerace[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 309
Default Sphere-cone reentry vehicles

Why is the Apollo CM described as a spherical section RV and not a
sphere-cone RV?
  #2  
Old May 26th 08, 05:45 PM posted to sci.space.history
Orval Fairbairn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 154
Default Sphere-cone reentry vehicles

In article
,
Neil Gerace wrote:

Why is the Apollo CM described as a spherical section RV and not a
sphere-cone RV?


Because the side facing re-entry is a spherical section.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.
  #3  
Old May 28th 08, 02:52 AM posted to sci.space.history
Neil Gerace[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 309
Default Sphere-cone reentry vehicles

On May 27, 12:45*am, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:
In article
,
*Neil Gerace wrote:

Why is the Apollo CM described as a spherical section RV and not a
sphere-cone RV?


Because the side facing re-entry is a spherical section.


Ok, but the rest of it is a cone, isn't it?
  #4  
Old May 28th 08, 04:49 AM posted to sci.space.history
Orval Fairbairn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 154
Default Sphere-cone reentry vehicles

In article
,
Neil Gerace wrote:

On May 27, 12:45*am, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:
In article
,
*Neil Gerace wrote:

Why is the Apollo CM described as a spherical section RV and not a
sphere-cone RV?


Because the side facing re-entry is a spherical section.


Ok, but the rest of it is a cone, isn't it?


Yes, but the cone faces AWAY from the heat shield.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.
  #5  
Old May 28th 08, 05:15 AM posted to sci.space.history
Derek Lyons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,999
Default Sphere-cone reentry vehicles

Neil Gerace wrote:

On May 27, 12:45*am, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:
In article
,
*Neil Gerace wrote:

Why is the Apollo CM described as a spherical section RV and not a
sphere-cone RV?


Because the side facing re-entry is a spherical section.


Ok, but the rest of it is a cone, isn't it?


Only the section facing re-entry counts.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
  #6  
Old May 28th 08, 08:02 AM posted to sci.space.history
Neil Gerace[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 309
Default Sphere-cone reentry vehicles

On May 28, 12:15*pm, (Derek Lyons) wrote:
Neil Gerace wrote:
On May 27, 12:45*am, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:
In article
,
*Neil Gerace wrote:


Why is the Apollo CM described as a spherical section RV and not a
sphere-cone RV?


Because the side facing re-entry is a spherical section.


Ok, but the rest of it is a cone, isn't it?


Only the section facing re-entry counts.


Ah, OK.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How smooth need a cyclone inner cone be? Jeff Johnson Astronomy Misc 0 June 27th 06 06:37 AM
How smooth need a cyclone inner cone be? Henrietta K Thomas Astronomy Misc 0 June 27th 06 06:29 AM
Hill Sphere versus Laplace Sphere Jake Astronomy Misc 4 August 3rd 04 02:41 AM
Nose first reentry on winged vehicles David Findlay Space Shuttle 2 July 25th 04 02:14 AM
ASTRO: Cone Nebula in Ha Richard Crisp CCD Imaging 0 January 3rd 04 09:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.