Instantanious and QM actions and distances.

Both mean action at a distance is reality. TreBert

On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:52:01 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Both mean action at a distance is reality. TreBert

Action of particles moving away from each other and knowing how fast .How far. Gravity lost.Radiation lost. and how they still know each direction of spin. Some of this is known,but what is not is very interesting YES TreBert

On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:52:01 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Both mean action at a distance is reality. TreBert

Its Reality With bigger space between particles their mutual gravity force gets weaker. That is elementary TrebERT

On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 3:52:01 PM UTC-4, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Both mean action at a distance is reality. TreBert

HAVAC READ THE POSTS,AND SEE WHAT A LOW WIT IS.SHAME HAVAC HAVAC POSTS ARE PITIFULL TREBERT

On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:52:01 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Both mean action at a distance is reality. TreBert

The Cosmos is so big,and light is so slow that without instantaneous actions the time laps would make communication between particles impossible . Coupling now is more than a theory its reality. TreBert

On Monday, July 7, 2014 11:10:41 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:52:01 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:

Both mean action at a distance is reality. TreBert



The Cosmos is so big,and light is so slow that without instantaneous actions the time laps would make communication between particles impossible . Coupling now is more than a theory its reality. TreBert


I liked it when I was coupled.

Double=A

On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:52:01 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Both mean action at a distance is reality. TreBert
Reality is if gravity varies from place to place time fallows suit. If Jupiter had life it would have a longer time lapse(laps) Go figure TreBert

On Tuesday, July 8, 2014 1:45:32 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:52:01 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:

Both mean action at a distance is reality. TreBert

Reality is if gravity varies from place to place time fallows suit. If Jupiter had life it would have a longer time lapse(laps) Go figure TreBert

That doesn't make a lot of sense, if any.

How much gravity do fish experience?

There are immortal jellyfish as is, so how would adding more gravity help them live any longer?

Gravity kills more of us than most anything else our planet has to offer. Less gravity would be a very good thing for most of us humans.

On Tuesday, July 8, 2014 1:45:32 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 12:52:01 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:

Both mean action at a distance is reality. TreBert

Reality is if gravity varies from place to place time fallows suit. If Jupiter had life it would have a longer time lapse(laps) Go figure TreBert


One thing that hasn't been sufficiently tested is the constancy of gravity over time. Will a ball fall at exactly the same rate today as it did in Galileo's time? It is assumed that the gravitational constant is constant over both time and space. Yet getting a precise value for it has proved to be a problem. What if it has changed over time? What if it is different at different locations in the universe? If not, it might explain the things scientists have had to turn to dark matter and dark energy to explain.

Double-A

P.S. You great scientist who browse this newsgroup to get your ideas (Hawking et al) remember to give credit where credit is due.

On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 3:52:01 PM UTC-4, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Both mean action at a distance is reality. TreBert

LESS GRAVIT MEANS LESS AIR. MORE CHANCE OF HARMFULL INFERED ECT. TREBERT