#1
|
|||
|
|||
truss dobsonian?
Any advantage to a truss Dobsonian? I am thinking of buying a 10 inch
Dob- perhaps an Orion. Or a truss Dobsonian is a possibility. Bruce |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
truss dobsonian?
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:00:46 -0700 (PDT), brucegooglegroups
wrote: Any advantage to a truss Dobsonian? I am thinking of buying a 10 inch Dob- perhaps an Orion. Or a truss Dobsonian is a possibility. They are often lighter, and they break down smaller than solid tube Dobs. Mirrors may cool faster, and tube current effects are small. On the negative side, they can be more prone to dewing, and they can have more issues with stray light (both are fairly easily dealt with). If they are not well designed and well fabricated, they may have issues with collimation shifting with position. Again, though, that's not commonly a problem. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
truss dobsonian?
On Mar 15, 6:00*pm, brucegooglegroups wrote:
Any advantage to a truss Dobsonian? I am thinking of buying a 10 inch Dob- perhaps an Orion. *Or a truss Dobsonian is a possibility. The first advantage of a truss Dob that comes to mind is portability -- especially in larger (than 10-inch) apertures. A related advantage is the weight the owner will have to carry. When I carry out my 80 pound, 12-inch truss Dob (which I did a few nights ago) I do so in several, separate trips. IIRC, the heaviest single component of my 12- inch is about 36 pounds. Some people avoid lifting much weight via the use of wheeled handcarts. For 10-inch and smaller apertures the portability and weight advantages are 'borderline'. Often a 10-inch or smaller Dob is manageable enough and transportable enough without resorting to a truss assembly. For some people even a 12-inch, solid-tube Dob is manageable enough. Appropriate storage of the telescope (regardless of the design) will have to be worked out in a manner that provides adequate protection for the optics. Most owners of truss Dobs cover the truss assembly with some form of dark material to block light and/or to minimize dew and frost formation on the mirrors -- yet more work when one wants to use the telescope. Truss Dobs tend to need re-collimated prior to each use. Yet, depending upon how well designed the scope and accessories are, set-up and take-down *can* become a relatively quick and easy routine. All things considered, *if* a truss design is necessary in order to meet your current or future portability requirements -- then a truss Dob is the logical choice. Otherwise, a solid tube is likely to be more practical. Bill Greer To sketch is to see. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
truss dobsonian?
On Mar 15, 10:15 pm, wrote:
On Mar 15, 6:00 pm, brucegooglegroups wrote: Any advantage to a truss Dobsonian? I am thinking of buying a 10 inch Dob- perhaps an Orion. Or a truss Dobsonian is a possibility. The first advantage of a truss Dob that comes to mind is portability -- especially in larger (than 10-inch) apertures. A related advantage is the weight the owner will have to carry. When I carry out my 80 pound, 12-inch truss Dob (which I did a few nights ago) I do so in several, separate trips. IIRC, the heaviest single component of my 12- inch is about 36 pounds. Some people avoid lifting much weight via the use of wheeled handcarts. For 10-inch and smaller apertures the portability and weight advantages are 'borderline'. Often a 10-inch or smaller Dob is manageable enough and transportable enough without resorting to a truss assembly. For some people even a 12-inch, solid-tube Dob is manageable enough. Appropriate storage of the telescope (regardless of the design) will have to be worked out in a manner that provides adequate protection for the optics. Most owners of truss Dobs cover the truss assembly with some form of dark material to block light and/or to minimize dew and frost formation on the mirrors -- yet more work when one wants to use the telescope. Truss Dobs tend to need re-collimated prior to each use. Yet, depending upon how well designed the scope and accessories are, set-up and take-down *can* become a relatively quick and easy routine. All things considered, *if* a truss design is necessary in order to meet your current or future portability requirements -- then a truss Dob is the logical choice. Otherwise, a solid tube is likely to be more practical. Bill Greer To sketch is to see. Hi Bill, I am looking at a 10inch. At this size, the solid tube will be more practical. I am also thinking a buying a shed to store it outside. Comments on this? Bruce |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
truss dobsonian?
After going through 5 other telescopes of various configurations and prices,
the 10" Dob I bought from Orion is by far the best one. Exceptional optics and the tube with soft case easily fits in the trunk of my '71 Mustang along with camping gear. The base is the ~size of a child's car seat. "brucegooglegroups" wrote in message ... Any advantage to a truss Dobsonian? I am thinking of buying a 10 inch Dob- perhaps an Orion. Or a truss Dobsonian is a possibility. Bruce |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
truss dobsonian?
Careful of the refractor Gods, they may retaliate. Any advantage to a truss Dobsonian? I am thinking of buying a 10 inch Dob- perhaps an Orion. Or a truss Dobsonian is a possibility. Bruce |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
truss dobsonian?
On Mar 16, 8:08*am, brucegooglegroups wrote:
I am also thinking a buying a shed to store it outside. Comments on this? A shed can be used advantageously. When stored outside a telescope tends to be more accessable for use and closer to the temperature of the outside air. Also, with limited (or no) transport distances, the collimation is more likely to maintain itself. There are different concerns in different regions. For myself, dust, bugs and rodents were a concern with my roll-off-roof observatory. At the end of an observing session (after I was certain that any dew or frost had evaporated -- which sometimes meant waiting until the following afternoon) I would make certain that all openings in the optical tube assembly (OTA) were sealed or tightly covered. Even the smallest screw hole should be sealed. Some bugs are very tiny and capable of multiplying once they get inside! Besides, I try to do everything possible to minimize the accumulation of dust on my optics. The less often an optic needs to be clean -- the less likely it will be damaged. My final step consisted of covering the OTA with a tarp that I had duct-taped into the proper shape. You won't *have to* use the same routine as I outlined above. Just use common sense. When you notice a problem, take steps to fix it so that particular problem is never a problem again. For the first year make frequent inspections to make certain that your own protection scheme is working. After that, you should be able to rest more comfortably knowing that your telescope will be ready to go to work when you are. Bill Greer To sketch is to see. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
truss dobsonian?
On Mar 16, 11:10 am, "goodnigh" wrote:
After going through 5 other telescopes of various configurations and prices, the 10" Dob I bought from Orion is by far the best one. Exceptional optics and the tube with soft case easily fits in the trunk of my '71 Mustang along with camping gear. The base is the ~size of a child's car seat. "brucegooglegroups" wrote in message ... Any advantage to a truss Dobsonian? I am thinking of buying a 10 inch Dob- perhaps an Orion. Or a truss Dobsonian is a possibility. Bruce Hi, Have you tried Orion's 8inch Dob, and how does it compare? I toying with the idea of buying an intelliscope, and I will borrow a 10 inch from my astronomy club. But I am adept enough at reading star charts not to need the digital setting circles. Bruce |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
truss dobsonian?
On Mar 16, 11:10 am, "goodnigh" wrote:
After going through 5 other telescopes of various configurations and prices, the 10"DobI bought from Orion is by far the best one. Exceptional optics and the tube with soft case easily fits in the trunk of my '71 Mustang along with camping gear. The base is the ~size of a child's car seat. "brucegooglegroups" wrote in message ... Any advantage to atrussDobsonian? I am thinking of buying a 10 inch Dob- perhaps an Orion. Or atrussDobsonian is a possibility. Bruce Is your Dob an intelliscope or a classic? Bruce |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
truss dobsonian?
"brucegooglegroups" wrote in message ... On Mar 16, 11:10 am, "goodnigh" wrote: After going through 5 other telescopes of various configurations and prices, the 10"DobI bought from Orion is by far the best one. Exceptional optics and the tube with soft case easily fits in the trunk of my '71 Mustang along with camping gear. The base is the ~size of a child's car seat. "brucegooglegroups" wrote in message ... Any advantage to atrussDobsonian? I am thinking of buying a 10 inch Dob- perhaps an Orion. Or atrussDobsonian is a possibility. Bruce Is your Dob an intelliscope or a classic? Bruce Intelliscope, although I have never used that feature. You must buy the Intelliscope ready model even if you don't buy the computer. You can always buy the computer later. A friend and I built a green laser pointer that emanates from the finder scope. You point the laser where you want to look and the object is in the main scope's eyepiece. This setup has proven to be more useful. mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nice Truss | Starlord | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 29th 06 07:42 AM |
Pot Bottom Truss? | Stephen Paul | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | April 15th 04 06:36 AM |
C-11 or 13" Truss-DOB, that is the question... | Szaki | Amateur Astronomy | 58 | February 11th 04 10:50 PM |
Truss tube mfr/kit available? | gregory | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | September 24th 03 08:19 AM |
Truss Dob Questions | Edward | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | July 12th 03 02:09 PM |