|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ISS is an experiment
We should look at the ISS as an experiment. If we learn
ways NOT to build and operate solar arrays that's just fine. Sooner or later we will have to build large structures and ships on orbit and refuel them. This is what the russians began and ISS is an extension of these experiments. If all these things worked the first time they wouldn't be experiments. The experiments are NOT JUST the things that go on INSIDE the destiny module. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ISS is an experiment
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ISS is an experiment
LooseChanj wrote:
On or about Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:52:33 GMT, Brian Thorn made the sensational claim that: P6 is doing great for something that sat out several years longer than it was supposed to before being refolded and re-extended. Didn't they have trouble deploying those arrays the first time, all those years ago? Nothing really significant IIRC. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/ -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ISS is an experiment
"Derek Lyons" wrote in message ... LooseChanj wrote: On or about Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:52:33 GMT, Brian Thorn made the sensational claim that: Didn't they have trouble deploying those arrays the first time, all those years ago? Nothing really significant IIRC. I thought it was the re-folding of the arrays that caused some trouble. It required an EVA and an astronaut poking the array with a hockey stick like tool. It would be interesting to find out if the failed location on the array correlates with a location that wouldn't fold correctly and needed some prodding with the hockey stick. Jeff -- "When transportation is cheap, frequent, reliable, and flexible, everything else becomes easier." - Jon Goff |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ISS is an experiment
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:18:07 -0400, "Jeff Findley"
wrote: Didn't they have trouble deploying those arrays the first time, all those years ago? Nothing really significant IIRC. I thought it was the re-folding of the arrays that caused some trouble. Both. P6 did have that "springy" incident when it was originally unfurled too quickly. They learned from that and unfurled all the rest much more slowly. Then this is the same array that gave 116 fits last December. It required an EVA and an astronaut poking the array with a hockey stick like tool. It would be interesting to find out if the failed location on the array correlates with a location that wouldn't fold correctly and needed some prodding with the hockey stick. I think NASASpaceflight.com's play-by-play indicated it was indeed in the same place... Panel 11. If this is true, then someone really screwed up by not stopping at the panel before and waiting for good lighting before proceeding. But NSF.com, while an excellent resource, tends to be breathless reports at first followed by lots of "oh, neverminds" later. Brian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
other planets that have lightning bolts-- do they have plate tectonics ?? do the experiment with electric motor and also Faradays first electric motor is this the Oersted experiment writ large on the size of continental plates | a_plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 4 | September 16th 06 01:13 PM |
BOP experiment comes to successful end | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | April 21st 05 10:27 PM |
BOP experiment comes to successful end | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | April 21st 05 10:27 PM |
The two slit experiment. | Zdenek Jizba | Astronomy Misc | 6 | November 17th 04 04:47 AM |
An experiment I did | Niko Holm | Policy | 24 | January 23rd 04 03:00 PM |