#41
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:32:13 GMT, in uk.sci.astronomy , Yoda
wrote: Again for those who need it spelled out for them.....take an H, take an A, take an O, take an X, put them together,....what does that spell? Hoax right? Now take a V, take an I, take a D, take an E, and take an O, and put them together ok? What does that spell? Video...right. Now take a P, take an I, take a C, take a T, take an I, take an R, take an E, take an S, and put that together...what does that spell? Pictures..right....now we are getting somewhere. Do you understand yet, or do you still need it spelled out for you? The only thing we need spelled out is how much of troll you are, total, or merely quite large. Maybe they like this nonsense over in sci,astro or alt.astronomy, though I doubt it -- Mark McIntyre CLC FAQ http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html CLC readme: http://www.angelfire.com/ms3/bchambless0/welcome_to_clc.html ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Mark McIntyre wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:32:13 GMT, in uk.sci.astronomy , Yoda wrote: Again for those who need it spelled out for them.....take an H, take an A, take an O, take an X, put them together,....what does that spell? Hoax right? Now take a V, take an I, take a D, take an E, and take an O, and put them together ok? What does that spell? Video...right. Now take a P, take an I, take a C, take a T, take an I, take an R, take an E, take an S, and put that together...what does that spell? Pictures..right....now we are getting somewhere. Do you understand yet, or do you still need it spelled out for you? The only thing we need spelled out is how much of troll you are, total, or merely quite large. Maybe they like this nonsense over in sci,astro or alt.astronomy, though I doubt it Well you guys demonstrate such a duh factor when it comes to scientific cross talk that you make bafoons of yourselves with almost every so called 'attack' on my points of view. Like to discuss anything of seriousness requires everyone never 'crossing' the imaginary line of your dumb arse. You guys sometimes only prove that the science of the last one hundred years is really just a new religion. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Mark McIntyre wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:32:13 GMT, in uk.sci.astronomy , Yoda wrote: Again for those who need it spelled out for them.....take an H, take an A, take an O, take an X, put them together,....what does that spell? Hoax right? Now take a V, take an I, take a D, take an E, and take an O, and put them together ok? What does that spell? Video...right. Now take a P, take an I, take a C, take a T, take an I, take an R, take an E, take an S, and put that together...what does that spell? Pictures..right....now we are getting somewhere. Do you understand yet, or do you still need it spelled out for you? The only thing we need spelled out is how much of troll you are, total, or merely quite large. Maybe they like this nonsense over in sci,astro or alt.astronomy, though I doubt it Well you guys demonstrate such a duh factor when it comes to scientific cross talk that you make bafoons of yourselves with almost every so called 'attack' on my points of view. Like to discuss anything of seriousness requires everyone never 'crossing' the imaginary line of your dumb arse. You guys sometimes only prove that the science of the last one hundred years is really just a new religion. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
On 18 Jul 2004 16:08:09 -0700, Gruebait wrote:
For example there is no 'mud' on the moon, and yet the most famous pictures of the so-called "first footprint" clearly shows mud. snip more kookiness Clearly. Dust, moron, not mud. No water has been found on the moon. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
On 18 Jul 2004 16:08:09 -0700, Gruebait wrote:
For example there is no 'mud' on the moon, and yet the most famous pictures of the so-called "first footprint" clearly shows mud. snip more kookiness Clearly. Dust, moron, not mud. No water has been found on the moon. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
You're the moron to believe that picture which clearly shows moon mud is
dust. Dust doesnt leave footprints. And what museum has samples of this dust so that we can all view it and compare samples? Please you have to do better than that. vonroach wrote: On 18 Jul 2004 16:08:09 -0700, Gruebait wrote: For example there is no 'mud' on the moon, and yet the most famous pictures of the so-called "first footprint" clearly shows mud. It was the US government in the documentary who was laughing about the muddy footprint photo that the whole world believes is true, and ofcourse morons like yourself who think it depicts "moon dust". snip more kookiness Clearly. Dust, moron, not mud. No water has been found on the moon. Duh.... The flag is clearly seen fluttering in the wind. Duh...there is no wind on the moon because it has no atmosphere, unless you believe the Russians who say it has developed an atmosphere of recent times. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
You're the moron to believe that picture which clearly shows moon mud is
dust. Dust doesnt leave footprints. And what museum has samples of this dust so that we can all view it and compare samples? Please you have to do better than that. vonroach wrote: On 18 Jul 2004 16:08:09 -0700, Gruebait wrote: For example there is no 'mud' on the moon, and yet the most famous pictures of the so-called "first footprint" clearly shows mud. It was the US government in the documentary who was laughing about the muddy footprint photo that the whole world believes is true, and ofcourse morons like yourself who think it depicts "moon dust". snip more kookiness Clearly. Dust, moron, not mud. No water has been found on the moon. Duh.... The flag is clearly seen fluttering in the wind. Duh...there is no wind on the moon because it has no atmosphere, unless you believe the Russians who say it has developed an atmosphere of recent times. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
On 18 Jul 2004, Yoda astonished sci.astro by claiming:
The `scientific proof of the first moon walk' is one that all can share in the very detailed records and televised pictures that remain. It was a fact, just as Pearl Harbor was a fact regardless of the spin put on the facts. Ian snip For example there is no 'mud' on the moon, and yet the most famous pictures of the so-called "first footprint" clearly shows mud. snip more kookiness Clearly. -- gruebait one furlong/fortnight = 0.997857143 centimeters/minute |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
On 18 Jul 2004, Yoda astonished sci.astro by claiming:
The `scientific proof of the first moon walk' is one that all can share in the very detailed records and televised pictures that remain. It was a fact, just as Pearl Harbor was a fact regardless of the spin put on the facts. Ian snip For example there is no 'mud' on the moon, and yet the most famous pictures of the so-called "first footprint" clearly shows mud. snip more kookiness Clearly. -- gruebait one furlong/fortnight = 0.997857143 centimeters/minute |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Yoda wrote:
The `scientific proof of the first moon walk' is one that all can share in the very detailed records and televised pictures that remain. It was a fact, just as Pearl Harbor was a fact regardless of the spin put on the facts. The US government openly admitted recently that the moon pictures were hoaxed on the direct order of President Nixon. [snip] Anyhow the Moon Hoax pictures and video documentary which proves this is fact was shown on CBC and made by CBC. I presume you meant this documentary: http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...oon/about.html "This is no ordinary documentary. Its intent is to inform and entertain the viewer, but also to shake him up - make him aware that one should always view television with a critical eye." You failed. The purpose of the documentary is not to make revelations about the moon landings, but to demonstrate why fools like you shouldn't blindly believe everything you see on TeeVee. Tim -- My last .sig was rubbish too. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Astronomy Misc | 15 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ v4 | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 4th 03 11:52 PM |