|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fat cells found in “presolar” meteorite
On Jul 13, 5:54Â*pm, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 7月13æ—¥, 下åˆ4時27分, Wretch Fossil wrote: Fatcellsfoundin “presolarâ€meteorite Dr. Dan Richman discovered lipids inmeteoriteMurchison as shown in Fig. 8 athttp://astrobiology.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/2011-2-2-prebi... However, the lipids are in fact fossilizedfatcellsas labeled at Fig. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...77259053&p=226 Whitefatcells(adipocytes) contain a single lipid droplet surrounded by cytoplasm, as shown in these images: Fig. 2:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...77267355&p=227 Image source and credit for Fig. 2:http://jcem.endojournals.org/content...expansion.html http://tanyapeale.com/blog1/wp-conte...adipocyte1.gif Fatcellsdiffer from red bloodcellsin thatfatcellscan have different sizes in an animal while red bloodcellshave same size in an animal. Geological vesicles show no concentric circles, especially the central dark circle marked with green line in Fig. 1 above. Added on July 13, 2011: Lipid droplets have no membranes. The following images show lipid droplets have no membranes no matter they exist in a fat cell or not:http://www.sciencephoto.com/media/76211/enlarge http://www.sciencephoto.com/media/316590/enlarge http://www.sciencephoto.com/media/311662/enlarge The kelleher said: "You poor things,being off by close to 4 rotations across 4 orbital circuits is quite a feat as all it takes is basic arithmetic to count the 1461 days and rotations that make up 4 years and 4 orbital circuits,daily and orbital motions are separate so that when viewed from the standpoint of 24 hour rotations and days,Feb 29th as another day and rotation accounts for the orbital drift that occurs through Mar 1st every non leap year. No point in going into further details such as the 11 minute orbital discrepancy which separates 365 days 5 hours 49 minutes from the idealized calendar format of 365 1/4 rotations when you have a mindnumbing 366 1/4 rotations as a balance for 1 orbital circuit.On a scale of 1 to 10,this Ra/Dec driven error is unlike anything seen before and is simply 10 on a catastrophic scale for trying to squeeze 1465 rotations into 4 orbital circuits despite having cause and effect before readers in terms of the 1461 day/night cycles and subsequently the 1461 times the temperature fluctuates across 4 years telling readers that the balance is 365 1/4 rotations per circuit. You have these guys trying their level best to make something out of a 'leap second' tied to daily rotation while forgetting or not knowing what the Feb 29th leap day correction does in restoring the proportional balance between the number of rotations in a year/orbital circuit and this macro view the current fad look catastrophically dumb,not bad,not poor,sheer and utter intellectual desolation. Do you want to explain what Feb 29th does while adhering to 1465 rotations for 4 orbital circuits then good luck to you,you can always step back,look at the bigger picture and come to the only possible conclusion as a person who prides their intelligence." And Hanson said: .... precisely, "Chris.B", my friend. Thank you! You are the best ever mule to come back & ask for encore #43, because Chris has wisely recognized the need to publicize these essential but little known facts about Einstein & his Relativity work, in http://tinyurl.com/Crackpot-Einsteins-Crock wherein it says: -- "Chris.B" ( SEE end of post ) wrote: --- KW, Koobee Wublee wrote: ---- Jan Panteltje wrote: ----- "hanson" wrote: hanson wrote: Einstein, in his own words, just a year before he folded his relativity tent, closed his umbrella, kicked the bucket and finally puffed and bit the grass,.... Einstein wrote, in 1954, to his Italian friend Besso: |||AE:||| "as far as the laws of mathematics refer to |||AE:||| reality, they are not certain; and as far as they |||AE:||| are certain, they do not refer to reality." |||AE:||| "why would anyone be interested in getting exact |||AE:||| solutions from such an ephemeral set of equations?" |||AE:||| "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be |||AE:||| based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous |||AE:||| structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire |||AE:||| castle in the air, [my] gravitation theory included." |||AE:||| "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber". |||AE:||| ... [and I would make blouses instead (see link)] http://tinyurl.com/Blouse-Plumber-Einstein So, that then is the end of Einstein's infamous fantasy career-journey which concludes, long last, with what most enlightened folks have suspected for a long time, if not outright from the start, that: ====== SR is short for STUPID RANT and ====== ===== GR is just a GULLIBLE RECITATION ==== Einstein flagellated himself & came clean (1), after he was used by the Zios for their own, to them then noble political agenda. (2) http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein (1) http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2 (1) http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft (1) http://tinyurl.com/Zio-Politics-with-Relativity (2) http://tinyurl.com/Alberts-Zio-Politics-w-SR-GR (2) GR/SR is a useless crock o'****, save it being "a Base", an "al Qaida", for Einstein Dingleberries to worship Albert's sphincter.. although AE said not to do that. Professor Panteltje wrote: I do get a bit sick of the 'Einstein was right again crowd'. He was not, he was just a math fiddler, curve fitter. If somebody asks: How much is 2 + 3, and Einstein would have answered : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Then saying: "see, he once did say 5, he was right again", is really really bad. He had no clue, and died without one. That he was pushed by the US at that time as a great scientist to brush up the Jewish image was also a mistake, as he did not have that clue, and just jammed science with his curve fitting replacing simple physics understanding. KW wrote: Please allow Yours Truly to remind everyone whether if he/she is a true scholar of physics or another Orwellian-ill-educated Einstein Dingleberry that fall in the following ridiculous traits: ** FAITH IS THEORY ** LYING IS TEACHING ** NITWIT IS GENIUS ** OCCULT IS SCIENCE ** PARADOX IS KOSHER ** FUDGING IS DERIVATION ** BULL**** IS TRUTH ** BELIEVING IS LEARNING ** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM ** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE ** CONJECTURE IS REALITY ** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY ** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS Newton discovered the law of gravity in which if the gravitating mass is positive, gravitational force is attractive. The reverse, although never been observed, must be true. That is if the gravitating mass is negative, the gravitational effect must be repulsive or antigravity. shrug Later on, it was discovered by Poisson that the gradient of the Newtonian gravitational potential is equivalent to the mass density. In free space, this mass density [rho] is zero. hanson wrote: Revisiting an earlier discussion: http://tinyurl.com/hanson-d2G-Question Newton in his 2 or 3rd Principia edition, 300 years before Einstein, addresses Gravitation as G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2. Einstein was to lazy or stupid to incorporate G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2 into his GR croc. Or maybe Albert was still scared from his 1907 confession and apology for him having stolen E-mc^2. http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2 http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft Despite all that, like brainwashed addicted cultists, current day Dingleberries still worship Einstein's sphincter, full well knowing that for the last 70 years, experiments show Newtonian's gravitation also to be: G = H^2/rho wherein H is the Hubble constent and rho is the mas-density (even on cosmic scales), (some small digits & pi omitted here) all of which can be concatenated into the skeletal 1234 cosmic envelope as c = (GM/R)^1/2 = (GMH)^1/3 = (GM*b_r)^1/4 IOW, none of Einstein's convoluted **** has any use in the here and real universe that we live in. .... KW is correct in his assessment. KW continued & wrote: However, it does not take a genius to figure out if the mass density is negative, gravitational effect becomes repulsive. Poisson was the very first person to suggest antigravity but knew better not to. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was just so ****ing ignorant that this nitwit, this plagiarist, and the liar had no hesitation to claim negative mass density in vacuum in which the giants before this nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar knew better not to go there. shrug Now, the self-styled physicists are getting hard-ons whenever Dark Energy (negative mass density in vacuum) is mentioned. What the **** does negative mass mean? The only plausible answer is ignorance. After all, they are still worshipping Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar as a god. Anything this nitwit, the plagiarist, and this liar uttered just bedazzaled the hell out of these self-styled physicists. That is called Dingleberry worshipping. shrug Moving on to GR, the silliness embraced by the self-styled physicists exponentially amplifies. The Schwarzschild metric was discovered by Hilbert not Schwarzschild. Both metrics are mathematically legal solutions to the field equations that are static, spherically symmetric, and asymptotically flat. Schwarzschild's original solution does not allow for the existence of black holes. Let's look at the Schwarzschild metric before the integrating constant is identified through the boundary requirement of satisfying the Newtonian law of gravity. There are more integration constants, but for the purpose of this discussion, they are ignored. ** ds^2 = c^2 (1 + K / r) dt^2 - dr^2 / (1 + K / r) - r^2 dO^2 Where ** K = One of the many integration constants ** dO^2 = cos^2(Latitude) dLongitude^2 + dLatitude^2 Notice this particular solution predicts just about everything from gravitation to antigravity. There is no definitive reasoning to pin- point this particular integration constant as the following besides through this boundary condition that emphasizes hind sights are always 20/20. shrug ** K = - 2 G M / c^2, Newtonian compatibility requirement This point collaborates with Professor Ponte's astute observation of how Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar reasoned. shrug Chris.B" wrote: I fully agree with what KW, JP & hanson said above. I adore and revere Koobee Wublee, Jan Panteltje and hanson I am honored to be on the poster list as an appendage.. I have requested them to repost his note every time I do respond to it. I need to see this post every day. It makes me feel being intelligent and smart like they are. I don't know any arithmetic nor algebra at all. My personal negativity which I have posted about in my google group profile forces me to be like this. Here is my passport-http://tinyurl.com/Picture-of-Chris-B No I didn't. I was misquoted. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fat cells found in “presolar” meteorite
"Chris.B" wrote about a Wretch
Fossil and Fat cells found in "Fat Gerald", The kelleher, which are snipped since my friend, "Chris.B", does remain my best ever mule to come back & ask for encore #45, because Chris has wisely recognized the need to publicize these essential but little known facts about Einstein & his Relativity work, in http://tinyurl.com/Crackpot-Einsteins-Crock wherein it says: -- "Chris.B" ( SEE end of post ) wrote: --- KW, Koobee Wublee wrote: ---- Jan Panteltje wrote: ----- "hanson" wrote: hanson wrote: Einstein, in his own words, just a year before he folded his relativity tent, closed his umbrella, kicked the bucket and finally puffed and bit the grass,.... Einstein wrote, in 1954, to his Italian friend Besso: |||AE:||| "as far as the laws of mathematics refer to |||AE:||| reality, they are not certain; and as far as they |||AE:||| are certain, they do not refer to reality." |||AE:||| "why would anyone be interested in getting exact |||AE:||| solutions from such an ephemeral set of equations?" |||AE:||| "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be |||AE:||| based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous |||AE:||| structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire |||AE:||| castle in the air, [my] gravitation theory included." |||AE:||| "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber". |||AE:||| ... [and I would make blouses instead (see link)] http://tinyurl.com/Blouse-Plumber-Einstein So, that then is the end of Einstein's infamous fantasy career-journey which concludes, long last, with what most enlightened folks have suspected for a long time, if not outright from the start, that: ====== SR is short for STUPID RANT and ====== ===== GR is just a GULLIBLE RECITATION ==== Einstein flagellated himself & came clean (1), after he was used by the Zios for their own, to them then noble political agenda. (2) http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein (1) http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2 (1) http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft (1) http://tinyurl.com/Zio-Politics-with-Relativity (2) http://tinyurl.com/Alberts-Zio-Politics-w-SR-GR (2) GR/SR is a useless crock o'****, save it being "a Base", an "al Qaida", for Einstein Dingleberries to worship Albert's sphincter.. although AE said not to do that. Professor Panteltje wrote: I do get a bit sick of the 'Einstein was right again crowd'. He was not, he was just a math fiddler, curve fitter. If somebody asks: How much is 2 + 3, and Einstein would have answered : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Then saying: "see, he once did say 5, he was right again", is really really bad. He had no clue, and died without one. That he was pushed by the US at that time as a great scientist to brush up the Jewish image was also a mistake, as he did not have that clue, and just jammed science with his curve fitting replacing simple physics understanding. KW wrote: Please allow Yours Truly to remind everyone whether if he/she is a true scholar of physics or another Orwellian-ill-educated Einstein Dingleberry that fall in the following ridiculous traits: ** FAITH IS THEORY ** LYING IS TEACHING ** NITWIT IS GENIUS ** OCCULT IS SCIENCE ** PARADOX IS KOSHER ** FUDGING IS DERIVATION ** BULL**** IS TRUTH ** BELIEVING IS LEARNING ** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM ** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE ** CONJECTURE IS REALITY ** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY ** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS Newton discovered the law of gravity in which if the gravitating mass is positive, gravitational force is attractive. The reverse, although never been observed, must be true. That is if the gravitating mass is negative, the gravitational effect must be repulsive or antigravity. shrug Later on, it was discovered by Poisson that the gradient of the Newtonian gravitational potential is equivalent to the mass density. In free space, this mass density [rho] is zero. hanson wrote: Revisiting an earlier discussion: http://tinyurl.com/hanson-d2G-Question Newton in his 2 or 3rd Principia edition, 300 years before Einstein, addresses Gravitation as G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2. Einstein was to lazy or stupid to incorporate G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2 into his GR croc. Or maybe Albert was still scared from his 1907 confession and apology for him having stolen E-mc^2. http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2 http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft Despite all that, like brainwashed addicted cultists, current day Dingleberries still worship Einstein's sphincter, full well knowing that for the last 70 years, experiments show Newtonian's gravitation also to be: G = H^2/rho wherein H is the Hubble constent and rho is the mas-density (even on cosmic scales), (some small digits & pi omitted here) all of which can be concatenated into the skeletal 1234 cosmic envelope as c = (GM/R)^1/2 = (GMH)^1/3 = (GM*b_r)^1/4 IOW, none of Einstein's convoluted **** has any use in the here and real universe that we live in. .... KW is correct in his assessment. KW continued & wrote: However, it does not take a genius to figure out if the mass density is negative, gravitational effect becomes repulsive. Poisson was the very first person to suggest antigravity but knew better not to. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was just so ****ing ignorant that this nitwit, this plagiarist, and the liar had no hesitation to claim negative mass density in vacuum in which the giants before this nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar knew better not to go there. shrug Now, the self-styled physicists are getting hard-ons whenever Dark Energy (negative mass density in vacuum) is mentioned. What the **** does negative mass mean? The only plausible answer is ignorance. After all, they are still worshipping Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar as a god. Anything this nitwit, the plagiarist, and this liar uttered just bedazzaled the hell out of these self-styled physicists. That is called Dingleberry worshipping. shrug Moving on to GR, the silliness embraced by the self-styled physicists exponentially amplifies. The Schwarzschild metric was discovered by Hilbert not Schwarzschild. Both metrics are mathematically legal solutions to the field equations that are static, spherically symmetric, and asymptotically flat. Schwarzschild's original solution does not allow for the existence of black holes. Let's look at the Schwarzschild metric before the integrating constant is identified through the boundary requirement of satisfying the Newtonian law of gravity. There are more integration constants, but for the purpose of this discussion, they are ignored. ** ds^2 = c^2 (1 + K / r) dt^2 - dr^2 / (1 + K / r) - r^2 dO^2 Where ** K = One of the many integration constants ** dO^2 = cos^2(Latitude) dLongitude^2 + dLatitude^2 Notice this particular solution predicts just about everything from gravitation to antigravity. There is no definitive reasoning to pin- point this particular integration constant as the following besides through this boundary condition that emphasizes hind sights are always 20/20. shrug ** K = - 2 G M / c^2, Newtonian compatibility requirement This point collaborates with Professor Ponte's astute observation of how Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar reasoned. shrug Chris.B" wrote: I fully agree with what KW, JP & hanson said above. I adore and revere Koobee Wublee, Jan Panteltje and hanson I am honored to be on the poster list as an appendage.. I have requested them to repost his note every time I do respond to it. I need to see this post every day. It makes me feel being intelligent and smart like they are. I don't know any arithmetic nor algebra at all. My personal negativity which I have posted about in my google group profile forces me to be like this. Here is my passport-http://tinyurl.com/Picture-of-Chris-B |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Fat cells found in “presolar” meteorite
On Jul 14, 8:41*pm, "hanson" wrote:
snip Lies, damned lies and Hanson. And now a message to Hanson from kelleher: kelleher said: "You poor things,being off by close to 4 rotations across 4 orbital circuits is quite a feat as all it takes is basic arithmetic to count the 1461 days and rotations that make up 4 years and 4 orbital circuits,daily and orbital motions are separate so that when viewed from the standpoint of 24 hour rotations and days,Feb 29th as another day and rotation accounts for the orbital drift that occurs through Mar 1st every non leap year. No point in going into further details such as the 11 minute orbital discrepancy which separates 365 days 5 hours 49 minutes from the idealized calendar format of 365 1/4 rotations when you have a mindnumbing 366 1/4 rotations as a balance for 1 orbital circuit.On a scale of 1 to 10,this Ra/Dec driven error is unlike anything seen before and is simply 10 on a catastrophic scale for trying to squeeze 1465 rotations into 4 orbital circuits despite having cause and effect before readers in terms of the 1461 day/night cycles and subsequently the 1461 times the temperature fluctuates across 4 years telling readers that the balance is 365 1/4 rotations per circuit. You have these guys trying their level best to make something out of a 'leap second' tied to daily rotation while forgetting or not knowing what the Feb 29th leap day correction does in restoring the proportional balance between the number of rotations in a year/orbital circuit and this macro view the current fad look catastrophically dumb,not bad,not poor,sheer and utter intellectual desolation. Do you want to explain what Feb 29th does while adhering to 1465 rotations for 4 orbital circuits then good luck to you,you can always step back,look at the bigger picture and come to the only possible conclusion as a person who prides their intelligence." Cue hanson: |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Fat cells found in “presolar” meteorite
On Jul 14, 8:41Â*pm, "hanson" wrote:
"Chris.B" wrote about a Â*Wretch Fossil and Fat cells found in "Fat Gerald", The kelleher, which are snipped since my friend, "Chris.B", does remain my best ever mule to come back & ask for encore #45, because Chris has wisely recognized the need to publicize these essential but little known facts about Einstein & his Relativity work, in Â*http://tinyurl.com/Crackpot-Einsteins-Crock wherein it says: -- "Chris.B" ( SEE end of post ) wrote: --- KW, Koobee Wublee wrote: ---- Jan Panteltje wrote:----- "hanson" wrote: hanson wrote: Einstein, in his own words, just a year before he folded his relativity tent, closed his umbrella, kicked the bucket and finally puffed and bit the grass,.... Einstein wrote, in 1954, to his Italian friend Besso: |||AE:||| "as far as the laws of mathematics refer to |||AE:||| reality, they are not certain; and as far as they |||AE:||| are certain, they do not refer to reality." |||AE:||| "why would anyone be interested in getting exact |||AE:||| solutions from such an ephemeral set of equations?" |||AE:||| "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be |||AE:||| based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous |||AE:||| structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire |||AE:||| castle in the air, [my] gravitation theory included." |||AE:||| "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber". |||AE:||| ... [and I would make blouses instead (see link)] http://tinyurl.com/Blouse-Plumber-Einstein So, that then is the end of Einstein's infamous fantasy career-journey which concludes, long last, with what most enlightened folks have suspected for a long time, if not outright from the start, that: ====== SR is short for STUPID RANT and ====== ===== GR is just a GULLIBLE RECITATION ==== Einstein flagellated himself & came clean (1), after he was used by the Zios for their own, to them then noble political agenda. (2) http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein (1) http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2 (1) http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft (1) http://tinyurl.com/Zio-Politics-with-Relativity (2) http://tinyurl.com/Alberts-Zio-Politics-w-SR-GR (2) GR/SR is a useless crock o'****, save it being "a Base", an "al Qaida", for Einstein Dingleberries to worship Albert's sphincter.. although AE said not to do that. Professor Panteltje wrote: I do get a bit sick of the 'Einstein was right again crowd'. He was not, he was just a math fiddler, curve fitter. If somebody asks: How much is 2 + 3, and Einstein would have answered : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Then saying: "see, he once did say 5, he was right again", is really really bad. He had no clue, and died without one. That he was pushed by the US at that time as a great scientist to brush up the Jewish image was also a mistake, as he did not have that clue, and just jammed science with his curve fitting replacing simple physics understanding. KW wrote: Please allow Yours Truly to remind everyone whether if he/she is a true scholar of physics or another Orwellian-ill-educated Einstein Dingleberry that fall in the following ridiculous traits: ** FAITH IS THEORY ** LYING IS TEACHING ** NITWIT IS GENIUS ** OCCULT IS SCIENCE ** PARADOX IS KOSHER ** FUDGING IS DERIVATION ** BULL**** IS TRUTH ** BELIEVING IS LEARNING ** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM ** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE ** CONJECTURE IS REALITY ** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY ** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS Newton discovered the law of gravity in which if the gravitating mass is positive, gravitational force is attractive. The reverse, although never been observed, must be true. That is if the gravitating mass is negative, the gravitational effect must be repulsive or antigravity. shrug Later on, it was discovered by Poisson that the gradient of the Newtonian gravitational potential is equivalent to the mass density. In free space, this mass density [rho] is zero. hanson wrote: Revisiting an earlier discussion: http://tinyurl.com/hanson-d2G-Question Newton in his 2 or 3rd Principia edition, 300 years before Einstein, addresses Gravitation as G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2. Einstein was to lazy or stupid to incorporate G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2 into his GR croc. Or maybe Albert was still scared from his 1907 confession and apology for him having stolen E-mc^2. http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2 http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft Despite all that, like brainwashed addicted cultists, current day Dingleberries still worship Einstein's sphincter, full well knowing that for the last 70 years, experiments show Newtonian's gravitation also to be: G = H^2/rho wherein H is the Hubble constent and rho is the mas-density (even on cosmic scales), (some small digits & pi omitted here) all of which can be concatenated into the skeletal 1234 cosmic envelope as c = (GM/R)^1/2 = (GMH)^1/3 = (GM*b_r)^1/4 IOW, none of Einstein's convoluted **** has any use in the here and real universe that we live in. .... KW is correct in his assessment. KW continued & wrote: However, it does not take a genius to figure out if the mass density is negative, gravitational effect becomes repulsive. Poisson was the very first person to suggest antigravity but knew better not to. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was just so ****ing ignorant that this nitwit, this plagiarist, and the liar had no hesitation to claim negative mass density in vacuum in which the giants before this nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar knew better not to go there. shrug Now, the self-styled physicists are getting hard-ons whenever Dark Energy (negative mass density in vacuum) is mentioned. What the **** does negative mass mean? The only plausible answer is ignorance. After all, they are still worshipping Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar as a god. Anything this nitwit, the plagiarist, and this liar uttered just bedazzaled the hell out of these self-styled physicists. That is called Dingleberry worshipping. shrug Moving on to GR, the silliness embraced by the self-styled physicists exponentially amplifies. The Schwarzschild metric was discovered by Hilbert not Schwarzschild. Both metrics are mathematically legal solutions to the field equations that are static, spherically symmetric, and asymptotically flat. Schwarzschild's original solution does not allow for the existence of black holes. Let's look at the Schwarzschild metric before the integrating constant is identified through the boundary requirement of satisfying the Newtonian law of gravity. There are more integration constants, but for the purpose of this discussion, they are ignored. ** ds^2 = c^2 (1 + K / r) dt^2 - dr^2 / (1 + K / r) - r^2 dO^2 Where ** K = One of the many integration constants ** dO^2 = cos^2(Latitude) dLongitude^2 + dLatitude^2 Notice this particular solution predicts just about everything from gravitation to antigravity. There is no definitive reasoning to pin- point this particular integration constant as the following besides through this boundary condition that emphasizes hind sights are always 20/20. shrug ** K = - 2 G M / c^2, Newtonian compatibility requirement This point collaborates with Professor Ponte's astute observation of how Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar reasoned. shrug Chris.B" wrote: I fully agree with what KW, JP & hanson said above. I adore and revere Koobee Wublee, Jan Panteltje and hanson I am honored to be on the poster list as an appendage.. I have requested them to repost his note every time I do respond to it. I need to see this post every day. It makes me feel being intelligent and smart like they are. I don't know any arithmetic nor algebra at all. My personal negativity which I have posted about in my google group profile forces me to be like this. Here is my passport-http://tinyurl.com/Picture-of-Chris-B Lies damned lies and Hanson And then wretch said: Fat cells found in “presolar†meteorite Dr. Dan Richman discovered lipids in meteorite Murchison as shown in Fig. 8 at http://astrobiology.jhu.edu/wp-conte...2011-2-2-prebi... However, the lipids are in fact fossilized fat cells as labeled at Fig. 1: http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...77259053&p=226 White fat cells (adipocytes) contain a single lipid droplet surrounded by cytoplasm, as shown in these images: Fig. 2: http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...77267355&p=227 Image source and credit for Fig. 2: http://jcem.endojournals.org/content...expansion.html http://tanyapeale.com/blog1/wp-conte...adipocyte1.gif Fat cells differ from red blood cells in that fat cells can have different sizes in an animal while red blood cells have same size in an animal. Geological vesicles show no concentric circles, especially the central dark circle marked with green line in Fig. 1 above. and: On 7月13æ—¥, 下åˆ4時27分, Wretch Fossil wrote: - Show quoted text - Added on July 13, 2011: Lipid droplets have no membranes. The following images show lipid droplets have no membranes no matter they exist in a fat cell or not: http://www.sciencephoto.com/media/76211/enlarge http://www.sciencephoto.com/media/316590/enlarge http://www.sciencephoto.com/media/311662/enlarge And on and on and on. Are we having fun yet? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Fat cells found in “presolar” meteorite
"Chris.B" wrote about a Wretch
Fossil and Fat cells found in "Fat Gerald", The kelleher, asking: "And on & on & on. Are we having fun yet?" but which are snipped since my friend, "Chris.B", does remain my best ever mule to come back & ask for encore #46, because Chris has wisely recognized the need to publicize these essential but little known facts about Einstein & his Relativity work, in http://tinyurl.com/Crackpot-Einsteins-Crock wherein it says: -- "Chris.B" ( SEE end of post ) wrote: --- KW, Koobee Wublee wrote: ---- Jan Panteltje wrote: ----- "hanson" wrote: hanson wrote: Einstein, in his own words, just a year before he folded his relativity tent, closed his umbrella, kicked the bucket and finally puffed and bit the grass,.... Einstein wrote, in 1954, to his Italian friend Besso: |||AE:||| "as far as the laws of mathematics refer to |||AE:||| reality, they are not certain; and as far as they |||AE:||| are certain, they do not refer to reality." |||AE:||| "why would anyone be interested in getting exact |||AE:||| solutions from such an ephemeral set of equations?" |||AE:||| "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be |||AE:||| based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous |||AE:||| structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire |||AE:||| castle in the air, [my] gravitation theory included." |||AE:||| "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber". |||AE:||| ... [and I would make blouses instead (see link)] http://tinyurl.com/Blouse-Plumber-Einstein So, that then is the end of Einstein's infamous fantasy career-journey which concludes, long last, with what most enlightened folks have suspected for a long time, if not outright from the start, that: ====== SR is short for STUPID RANT and ====== ===== GR is just a GULLIBLE RECITATION ==== Einstein flagellated himself & came clean (1), after he was used by the Zios for their own, to them then noble political agenda. (2) http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein (1) http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2 (1) http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft (1) http://tinyurl.com/Zio-Politics-with-Relativity (2) http://tinyurl.com/Alberts-Zio-Politics-w-SR-GR (2) GR/SR is a useless crock o'****, save it being "a Base", an "al Qaida", for Einstein Dingleberries to worship Albert's sphincter.. although AE said not to do that. Professor Panteltje wrote: I do get a bit sick of the 'Einstein was right again crowd'. He was not, he was just a math fiddler, curve fitter. If somebody asks: How much is 2 + 3, and Einstein would have answered : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Then saying: "see, he once did say 5, he was right again", is really really bad. He had no clue, and died without one. That he was pushed by the US at that time as a great scientist to brush up the Jewish image was also a mistake, as he did not have that clue, and just jammed science with his curve fitting replacing simple physics understanding. KW wrote: Please allow Yours Truly to remind everyone whether if he/she is a true scholar of physics or another Orwellian-ill-educated Einstein Dingleberry that fall in the following ridiculous traits: ** FAITH IS THEORY ** LYING IS TEACHING ** NITWIT IS GENIUS ** OCCULT IS SCIENCE ** PARADOX IS KOSHER ** FUDGING IS DERIVATION ** BULL**** IS TRUTH ** BELIEVING IS LEARNING ** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM ** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE ** CONJECTURE IS REALITY ** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY ** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS Newton discovered the law of gravity in which if the gravitating mass is positive, gravitational force is attractive. The reverse, although never been observed, must be true. That is if the gravitating mass is negative, the gravitational effect must be repulsive or antigravity. shrug Later on, it was discovered by Poisson that the gradient of the Newtonian gravitational potential is equivalent to the mass density. In free space, this mass density [rho] is zero. hanson wrote: Revisiting an earlier discussion: http://tinyurl.com/hanson-d2G-Question Newton in his 2 or 3rd Principia edition, 300 years before Einstein, addresses Gravitation as G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2. Einstein was to lazy or stupid to incorporate G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2 into his GR croc. Or maybe Albert was still scared from his 1907 confession and apology for him having stolen E-mc^2. http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2 http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft Despite all that, like brainwashed addicted cultists, current day Dingleberries still worship Einstein's sphincter, full well knowing that for the last 70 years, experiments show Newtonian's gravitation also to be: G = H^2/rho wherein H is the Hubble constent and rho is the mas-density (even on cosmic scales), (some small digits & pi omitted here) all of which can be concatenated into the skeletal 1234 cosmic envelope as c = (GM/R)^1/2 = (GMH)^1/3 = (GM*b_r)^1/4 IOW, none of Einstein's convoluted **** has any use in the here and real universe that we live in. .... KW is correct in his assessment. KW continued & wrote: However, it does not take a genius to figure out if the mass density is negative, gravitational effect becomes repulsive. Poisson was the very first person to suggest antigravity but knew better not to. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was just so ****ing ignorant that this nitwit, this plagiarist, and the liar had no hesitation to claim negative mass density in vacuum in which the giants before this nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar knew better not to go there. shrug Now, the self-styled physicists are getting hard-ons whenever Dark Energy (negative mass density in vacuum) is mentioned. What the **** does negative mass mean? The only plausible answer is ignorance. After all, they are still worshipping Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar as a god. Anything this nitwit, the plagiarist, and this liar uttered just bedazzaled the hell out of these self-styled physicists. That is called Dingleberry worshipping. shrug Moving on to GR, the silliness embraced by the self-styled physicists exponentially amplifies. The Schwarzschild metric was discovered by Hilbert not Schwarzschild. Both metrics are mathematically legal solutions to the field equations that are static, spherically symmetric, and asymptotically flat. Schwarzschild's original solution does not allow for the existence of black holes. Let's look at the Schwarzschild metric before the integrating constant is identified through the boundary requirement of satisfying the Newtonian law of gravity. There are more integration constants, but for the purpose of this discussion, they are ignored. ** ds^2 = c^2 (1 + K / r) dt^2 - dr^2 / (1 + K / r) - r^2 dO^2 Where ** K = One of the many integration constants ** dO^2 = cos^2(Latitude) dLongitude^2 + dLatitude^2 Notice this particular solution predicts just about everything from gravitation to antigravity. There is no definitive reasoning to pin- point this particular integration constant as the following besides through this boundary condition that emphasizes hind sights are always 20/20. shrug ** K = - 2 G M / c^2, Newtonian compatibility requirement This point collaborates with Professor Ponte's astute observation of how Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar reasoned. shrug Chris.B" wrote: I fully agree with what KW, JP & hanson said above. I adore and revere Koobee Wublee, Jan Panteltje and hanson I am honored to be on the poster list as an appendage.. I have requested them to repost his note every time I do respond to it. I need to see this post every day. It makes me feel being intelligent and smart like they are. I don't know any arithmetic nor algebra at all. My personal negativity which I have posted about in my google group profile forces me to be like this. Here is my passport-http://tinyurl.com/Picture-of-Chris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fat cells found in “presolar” meteorite | Wretch Fossil | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | July 16th 11 12:36 PM |
White blood cells are found in coal and Martian meteorite. | Wretch Fossil | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | May 3rd 11 04:58 PM |
Mars meteorite contains numerous plant cells | jerry warner[_26_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 9th 09 05:14 AM |
Found: 7 muscle cells found in 7 muscle fascicles in a Mars fossillimb | Fossil Lin | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | June 17th 09 09:22 AM |
Green DNA found in cells in fascicles of muscle cells in legs on Mars | L.A.T.[_3_] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | June 17th 09 09:10 AM |