Finite Relativism Disproof

Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:

[...]

Numerology is not science so, no.


Numerology is deterministic. Mysteries aren't.

Numerology is meaningless so FR is meaningless.

Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:

[...]

So you have no clue at all then.


Doug is a mysterious individual, aware of nothing more than mysteries.

Doug has been acting like that since his -33% grade last semester.

Phil snips and tries to hide from the fact that he has
been shown to be a fool in his ignorance of the inside the
sphere solution. And all other solutions he has tried as
well.

Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


And phil has never looked at a textbook so he is not qualified
to say what they contain.


I see: Parallel Universes on the bookstore's shelves and people are
buying that. Doug thinks it's okay.

Science is doing just fine without you. You will never make any
contribution to science but it is good to have you here to laugh
at.

Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


Numerology is meaningless so FR is meaningless.


Well FR got answers, GR got blunders.

Well FR has wrong answers while GR has correct answers.
Your jealousy and hatred do not change the fact that
no experiment is in contraction with GR while all
are in contradiction with FR. It cannot even do
the GPS correction properly.

Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


Science is doing just fine without you. You will never make any
contribution to science but it is good to have you here to laugh
at.


Let's see who backup your claims.

I am laughing at you so that backs up my claim..

doug wrote:

More of your delusions. GR is doing just fine and will
continue to do so.

Hopefully you will retire before GR is silently dismissed.

doug wrote:

Find someone who disagrees with my assessment of your nonsense (except
you, of course, since you have no clue what any of it means).

Engineers, mathematicians, quantum physicists, computer scientists, and
so on...

Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


Well FR has wrong answers while GR has correct answers.
Your jealousy and hatred do not change the fact that
no experiment is in contraction with GR while all
are in contradiction with FR. It cannot even do
the GPS correction properly.


The Hubble Sphere proved GR was wrong a long time ago.

More of your delusions. GR is doing just fine and will
continue to do so.

Phil Bouchard wrote:

doug wrote:


I am laughing at you so that backs up my claim..


That's what I was saying. People do not agree with Doug-the-savior.

Find someone who disagrees with my assessment of your nonsense (except
you, of course, since you have no clue what any of it means).

Sam Wormley wrote:
[...]


'My name appears in the Acknowledgments of this book, [...]

This amuses me.