Venus/Moon ~ to Terraform, to DNA Seed, to Visit or NOT!

John Griffin and Rand Simberg,
Two seriously out of context sort of guys. What have we rusemasters of
this naysay Usenet from hell that sucks and blows, having to say as to
the primary or related subtopic at hand?

Instead we have to put up with yet another incest cloned pair of losers
like John Griffin and Rand Simberg that can't so much as constructively
contribute their own squat upon that which has anything whatsoever to
do with our moon or Venus. Impressive, isn't it?
-
Brad Guth

And we have ourselves yet another seriously out of context sort of guy
that's without a clue. What exactly have all of you rusemasters of
this naysay Usenet from hell that sucks and blows, having to say as to
the primary or related subtopic at hand???????

Instead we have to put up with yet another incest cloned buttology
worth of "Widdershins" and the pairs of so many other losers like John
Griffin and Rand Simberg that can't so much as constructively
contribute their own squat upon that which has anything whatsoever to
do with our moon or Venus. Impressive, isn't it?

Our moon is but one lethal and otherwise nasty orb, and there's
otherwise perfectly good reason to establish the LSE-CM/ISS before
China does. There's also significant signs of intelligent other life
on Venus, let upon the Earth we find only the likes of your pagan
naysayism that sucks and blows.
-
Brad Guth


Widdershins wrote:
1 Jun 2006 07:16:03 -0700, "Brad Guth"
licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:

John Griffin and Rand Simberg,
Two seriously out of context sort of guys. What have we rusemasters of
this naysay Usenet from hell that sucks and blows, having to say as to
the primary or related subtopic at hand?

Instead we have to put up with yet another incest cloned pair of losers
like John Griffin and Rand Simberg that can't so much as constructively
contribute their own squat upon that which has anything whatsoever to
do with our moon or Venus. Impressive, isn't it?
-
Brad Guth

Not only are you a brilliant astrophysicist, but you are also Pulitzer
worthy journalistic giant. As soon as you can figure out what I said,
you may respond. I predict you'll respond anyway.



Widdershins

If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.

On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 07:25:35 -0700, Widdershins
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message
:

Not only are you a brilliant astrophysicist, but you are also Pulitzer
worthy journalistic giant.

You've gone and missspleelt "gnat". HTH.
--
V.G.

"i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?"
- AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside.

Change pobox dot alaska to gci.

Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.

On 1 Jun 2006 07:58:33 -0700, "Brad Guth"
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message
. com:

And we have ourselves yet another seriously out of context sort of guy
that's without a clue. What exactly have all of you rusemasters of
this naysay Usenet from hell that sucks and blows, having to say as to
the primary or related subtopic at hand???????


Why is this not being cross-posted to alt.****nozzles, ****nozzle?
--
V.G.

"i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?"
- AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside.

Change pobox dot alaska to gci.

Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.

"Brad Guth" wrote:

And we have ourselves yet another seriously out of context
sort of guy that's without a clue. What exactly have all of
you rusemasters of this naysay Usenet from hell that sucks and
blows, having to say as to the primary or related subtopic at
hand???????

Instead we have to put up with yet another incest cloned
buttology worth of "Widdershins" and the pairs of so many
other losers like John Griffin and Rand Simberg that can't so
much as constructively contribute their own squat upon that
which has anything whatsoever to do with our moon or Venus.
Impressive, isn't it?

Our moon is but one lethal and otherwise nasty orb, and
there's otherwise perfectly good reason to establish the
LSE-CM/ISS before China does. There's also significant signs
of intelligent other life on Venus, let upon the Earth we find
only the likes of your pagan naysayism that sucks and blows.

The one sure thing is that you know less about the moon and Venus
than the average modern human, including Ethiopians, but
obviously excluding mohammedans, who are being held in slavery in
the 7th century by a barbarous cult founded by a pervert.

-
Brad Guth


Widdershins wrote:
1 Jun 2006 07:16:03 -0700, "Brad Guth"
licked the point of a #2 Yellow
Pencil, and wrote:

John Griffin and Rand Simberg,
Two seriously out of context sort of guys. What have we
rusemasters of this naysay Usenet from hell that sucks and
blows, having to say as to the primary or related subtopic
at hand?

Instead we have to put up with yet another incest cloned
pair of losers like John Griffin and Rand Simberg that can't
so much as constructively contribute their own squat upon
that which has anything whatsoever to do with our moon or
Venus. Impressive, isn't it? -
Brad Guth

Not only are you a brilliant astrophysicist, but you are also
Pulitzer worthy journalistic giant. As soon as you can figure
out what I said, you may respond. I predict you'll respond
anyway.

Brad is like one of those old tube-type radios. Sometimes there
could be a loose wire in there somewhere, and you'd have to slap
the sumbitch to get it into output mode and then it would just
run by itself for a few minutes and quit again.




Widdershins

If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.

"Brad Guth" wrote:

John Griffin and Rand Simberg,
Two seriously out of context sort of guys. What have we
rusemasters of this naysay Usenet from hell that sucks and
blows, having to say as to the primary or related subtopic at
hand?

Instead we have to put up with yet another incest cloned pair
of losers like John Griffin and Rand Simberg that can't so
much as constructively contribute their own squat upon that
which has anything whatsoever to do with our moon or Venus.
Impressive, isn't it? -
Brad Guth

Have you ever heard the advice that once you've eliminated all
but one possibility, that remaining one must be the truth? It's
true, and you've eliminated all imaginable explanations for your
yapping except one: You're out of your ****ing mind.

All you really know about Venus is that it's easier to see it at
noon than at midnight. Oh, wait...what the hell made me think
you know that?! Never mind. You don't know **** about Venus.

The sam hell you say with your butt-cheeks flapping in the lunar wind,
Griffin.

Besides there being other intelligent life as having existed/coexisted
upon Venus (I've got that proof nailed real good), it seems that I now
realize that by far the worse Van Allen belt around is the physical
moon itself, as for representing itself as essentially the solid
ultimate form of a Van Allen zone or Van Allen badlands that's real
TBI(total body irradiation) worthy and thus through and through DNA
nasty, especially if your going out and about on a clear and sunny day
as EVA moonsuit butt naked. By day or night, the local radon (Rn by
day or LRn by night) is in fact a worthy element that's going to react
rather nicely to the solar and otherwise continual cosmic energy
influx, creating more of those nifty soft-gamma and hard-X-rays on the
fly, sort of speak.

Further proof emerges, in that yourself and others of your incest
cloned kind are also into avoiding those prime core lander issues, by
way of their not honestly contributing or otherwise sharing info about
those powerful momentum reaction wheels that are so required, though so
entirely excluded from their previous Apollo missions, especially
essential because of all the nearby orbital, deorbit and down-range
mascon issues, plus dealing with whatever's of shifting mass and torque
issues within a given lander, nor are these folks and rusemasters
offering so much as any peep about the gamma and hard-X-ray environment
that's in addition to all the tens of meters deep moon-dust that's good
for supporting a surface tension of perhaps at best 0.5 g/cm2 if not at
worse being hopefully not less than 0.1 g/cm2 (don't count on any
clumping).

If given a physical dust influx of just a wussy micrometre per given
year (I usually get more than that on my TV set), as such represents a
meter of dust accumulation per million years, that is unless somehow
having been solar wind blown away, or otherwise somehow converted into
the lunar surface as becoming a significantly compressed or somewhat
chemically vulcanised or otherwise physically bonded solid form. By
the way; it seems such dust being the likes of titanium, iron and
carbon soot like graphites are also going to become and likely remain
as extremely electrostatic, not to mention of whatever's contributed as
radioactive debris mixed in for good measure, especially TBI nasty to
one's DNA since our moon is essentially a solid form of a Van Allen
belt, as having been nearly naked and thus collecting upon some of the
absolute worse known forms of solar and cosmic contributed radioactive
elements, as per easily having been collected upon and firmly held into
it's otherwise physically dark and somewhat salty surface.

Gamma Ray Moon (downright humanly lethal by day or night)
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060527.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:M...ument_cgro.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Grsradiation-med.jpg

Hard-X-Ray Moon (survivable by earthshine, though not so mooonsuit/DNA
friendly by day)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Moon_in_x-rays.gif
Remember that it's only the regular laws of physics that'll determine
the degree and/or population of those secondary/recoil photons of
hard-X-rays, that which are continually being made available from the
local and influx of radioactive and subsequent gamma environment, as
well as per such gamma energy interacting as it should with the local
mass of available elements, including the 3+ g/cm3 worth of basalt
density that'll do just perfectly fine and dandy, and of whatever's
heavier density worth of elements the better for generating those
hard-X-rays. I believe it's called radiation physics-101, or perhaps
duh-101.

Just in case you've missed out on one of my previous post, so for good
measure, here it is again.

Usenet topic: "we did not go to the moon.got it?."
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...914e4503b42f11

part one
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...7&q=illuminati


part two
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...58451&q=illumi...


astronauts interviewed
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...5966561&q=moon

all the evidence you need.is there

i like the glint on the wires holding them up the
amazing self standing astronaut and the footage
catching them placing a transfer of earth over the
window and claiming to be 150 000 miles from
earth.classic
hun,
My local internet bandwidth clearly sucks, so I can't hardly manage to
get a reasonable look-see or download without more than a few
complications, plus taking one heck of a great deal of time, although I
did appreciate what initial portion of Part-1 that I'd managed to view.

Their research into our NASA/Apollo fiasco is certainly looking as
though good enough to eat, but most of their still film image, movie
film and fuzzy video camera to film footage review is pretty much
focused upon the various content, which is in fact often skewed well
out of reason, along with several fairly obvious errors. However, I
believe it's not so much the image content as it is the image upon film
itself, that which way more than sucks and blows just about anything
but the NASA/Apollo version of the truth, especially of those
unfiltered Kodak moments that technically suck as even worse rotten
eggs more than any damn village idiot of a fool on any hill can
possibly ignore, that which tells us an even better story via
replicated science and of the well established Kodak laws of photon
physics, of having proven our not having walked moonsuit butt naked
upon that physically dark and TBI nasty moon of ours, that's otherwise
chuck full of being about as gamma and hard-X-ray lethal to human DNA
as all get out.

I've said this one before, that our nearly naked moon is essentially
providing a solid form of a lethal Van Allen belt, and it only gets
itself so much worse yet by day. How's that for my sharing a little
something extra that's the truth and nothing but God's truth about our
moon?
-
Brad Guth


John Griffin wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote:

And we have ourselves yet another seriously out of context
sort of guy that's without a clue. What exactly have all of
you rusemasters of this naysay Usenet from hell that sucks and
blows, having to say as to the primary or related subtopic at
hand???????

Instead we have to put up with yet another incest cloned
buttology worth of "Widdershins" and the pairs of so many
other losers like John Griffin and Rand Simberg that can't so
much as constructively contribute their own squat upon that
which has anything whatsoever to do with our moon or Venus.
Impressive, isn't it?

Our moon is but one lethal and otherwise nasty orb, and
there's otherwise perfectly good reason to establish the
LSE-CM/ISS before China does. There's also significant signs
of intelligent other life on Venus, let upon the Earth we find
only the likes of your pagan naysayism that sucks and blows.

The one sure thing is that you know less about the moon and Venus
than the average modern human, including Ethiopians, but
obviously excluding mohammedans, who are being held in slavery in
the 7th century by a barbarous cult founded by a pervert.

-
Brad Guth


Widdershins wrote:
1 Jun 2006 07:16:03 -0700, "Brad Guth"
licked the point of a #2 Yellow
Pencil, and wrote:

John Griffin and Rand Simberg,
Two seriously out of context sort of guys. What have we
rusemasters of this naysay Usenet from hell that sucks and
blows, having to say as to the primary or related subtopic
at hand?

Instead we have to put up with yet another incest cloned
pair of losers like John Griffin and Rand Simberg that can't
so much as constructively contribute their own squat upon
that which has anything whatsoever to do with our moon or
Venus. Impressive, isn't it? -
Brad Guth

Not only are you a brilliant astrophysicist, but you are also
Pulitzer worthy journalistic giant. As soon as you can figure
out what I said, you may respond. I predict you'll respond
anyway.

Brad is like one of those old tube-type radios. Sometimes there
could be a loose wire in there somewhere, and you'd have to slap
the sumbitch to get it into output mode and then it would just
run by itself for a few minutes and quit again.




Widdershins

If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.

"Brad Guth" wrote:

The sam hell you say with your butt-cheeks flapping in the
lunar wind, Griffin.

There should be a mooning joke in there somewhere.

Besides there being other intelligent life as having
existed/coexisted upon Venus (I've got that proof nailed real
good),

Only if you wrote it on recycled paper and nailed it onto your
skull, nutcase.

it seems that I now realize

No it doesn't.

[ raft of crazy **** snipped ]

(Paul Schlyter) wrote:

In article ,
John Griffin wrote:

All you really know about Venus is that it's easier to see it
at noon than at midnight.

Dunno about that .... at my latitudes, Venus is actually above
the horizon at midnight sometimes, you know. At such
occasions, Venus is much easier to see at midnight than at
noon....

Oops...Sweden...good point. I should have said you're more likely
to see it at noon if you try.

It's always cloudy during those times.

In article .com,
Brad Guth wrote:

The sam hell you say with your butt-cheeks flapping in the lunar wind,
Griffin.

Besides there being other intelligent life as having existed/coexisted
upon Venus (I've got that proof nailed real good), it seems that I now
realize that by far the worse Van Allen belt around is the physical
moon itself, as for representing itself as essentially the solid
ultimate form of a Van Allen zone or Van Allen badlands that's real
TBI(total body irradiation) worthy and thus through and through DNA
nasty, especially if your going out and about on a clear and sunny day
as EVA moonsuit butt naked. By day or night, the local radon (Rn by
day or LRn by night) is in fact a worthy element that's going to react
rather nicely to the solar and otherwise continual cosmic energy
influx, creating more of those nifty soft-gamma and hard-X-rays on the
fly, sort of speak.

So lets get this right. The Moon is WAY too unfriendly for humans yet
to walk upon it, yet there is life on Venus?

What colour is the sky on your planet?

--
The true enemy of science is psuedoscience...