|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Inflatable Martian flyby spaceship
Check out the Vis Viva Equation and the Rocket Equation
Vis Viva gives you the velocity required to carry out a mission Vf^2 = mu * (2/r - 1/a) and The rocket equation (aka Tsiolkovsky equation) is used to calculate the propellant fraction needed to accelerate a rocket to a desired velocity knowing its exhaust velocity Vf = Ve * LN(1/(1-u)) So, what 'seems right' can be calculated with some precision - using a little knowledge of rocket performance and interplanetary space. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Inflatable Martian flyby spaceship
On Dec 6, 4:11*pm, William Mook wrote:
Check out the Vis Viva Equation and the Rocket Equation Vis Viva gives you the velocity required to carry out a mission * Vf^2 = mu * (2/r - 1/a) and The rocket equation (aka Tsiolkovsky equation) is used to calculate the propellant fraction needed to accelerate a rocket to a desired velocity knowing its exhaust velocity * Vf = Ve * LN(1/(1-u)) So, what 'seems right' can be calculated with some precision - using a little knowledge of rocket performance and interplanetary space. An inflatable spaceship seems oriented toward reducing structural mass by replacing hardshell structure with fabric structure of some sort. Its best to do a mass budget of the spacecraft you propose to build. I've done this sort of thing, along with a lot of other interested aerospace engineers, beginning with vonBraun back in the late 40s, and I have come up with a series of minimum missions. I even got published in an Australian newspaper after giving a paper at an AIAA conference in the 1980s entitled 'Minimum Manned Moon Missions' - this after NASA said it would take $150 billion to return to the moon after getting there from scratch for $20 billion in the 1960s! lol. What's up with that? Bottom line we could go to the moon for less than $1.5 billion - and recently with the development of MEMs based rocketry - that's reduced to $0.48 billion!! By far the minimum mass is achieved by using LONG DURATION MECHANICAL COUNTER PRESSURE SUITS WITH MEMS SKIN - to maintain cleanliness and health of the wearer as gases and fluids are exchanged. Virtual reality hardware built into the helmets - along with a 'man multiplier' used as a haptic device in the long duration suit. In this way, various environments can be simulated in free space without any additional hardware at all. The suit itself masses about 20 kg (44 lbs) - per crew member. The big mass budget is life support. But with MEMs devices, these too are made supremely reliable and very lightweight. Consumables for long-duration missions is the critical issue. This is addressed by clever use of cryogenic propellants. http://www.scribd.com/doc/20053585/M...space-Overview While some have budgeted 22 kg per person per day to maintain a very lush life style - Gemini and Mercury astronauts consumed 0.77 kg per per day for non-renewable consumables. Using a hydrogen/oxygen propellant combination, and using the ullage and out-gassing of long duration propellants to generate energy with fuel cells, and then use the water to drink and reconstitute foods, and then use the waste water to evaporate to control heating (combined with the fuel cell's heat) - allows us to use less 282 kg per person per year. So, the mass budget becomes for a 2.5 year mars mission; 500 kg - consumables 200 kg - suit, life support 100 kg - astronaut 800 kg - total Another 1,100 kg of hydrogen and oxygen consumed over the same period - taken from the ullage/boil-off of the cryogen propellants carried along. 2,000 kg per person per mission. To accelerate from say 7 km/sec to 12 km/sec to travel to Mars, requires a delta-vee of 5 km/sec. With a 5% structural fraction for the rocket stage, and an exhaust velocity of 4.5 km/sec - the propellant needed is; u = 1 - 1/exp(5.0/4.5) = 0.670807012 ~ 67.1% propellant fraction Subtracting 5% and this value from 100% obtains 100.0% - 67.1% - 5.0% = 27.9% So, for each person we send to Mars, we need to propel 1/0.279 = 3.585 tons We actually need two stages for this... since we need to project an object with a speed of about 5 km/sec from the surface of Mars to send it back to Earth. So, we square this figure 3.585^2 = 12.847 tons And 1.1 tons which is only 1/8th the total propellant - can properly be called Ullage (the gas left over in an empty tank) and boil off. With an ideal mix ratio of 6 to 1 (not stoichiometric which is 8 to 1 - but more hydrogen rich to reduce molecular weight and improve performance of exhaust) we have about 2 and a fraction tons of hydrogen and 10 and a fraction tons of oxygen. Hydrogen is 0.07 tons per cubic meter and oxygen is 1.14 tons per cubic meter so total volume is 2/0.07 + 10/1.14 = 37.34 cubic meters - a sphere about 4 meters in diameter. So, the bulk of this is the empty hydrogen tank from the first stage - which is about twice the height of a person! Obviously a suited astronaut would use such an empty shell as housing. This was the whole idea behind a 'wet' Skylab concept. The booster rockets could be used as habitats for the journey out. An SSTO rocket, capable of carrying 4 tons to LEO would also be capable of being used as a second stage atop a 500 ton first stage - with the same SSTO capability - to loft a person to Mars and return them. This is achievable using MEMs rockets. A fully reusable system - consisting of say a dozen launchers - would launch a dozen upper stages every synodic period (2.15 years) - and the hydrogen tank would be sectioned so that an astronaut could enter the larger empty portion and pressurize it, with oxygen, and take his or her suit off if needed. A well crafted long-duration suit would avoid the need for taking the suit off and take good care of the astronaut inside. In fact, with MEMs technology one might imagine a suit with propulsive skin sections Similar to this; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzXwctPXT4c With Hydrogen/Oxygen propellant, we'd need tanks. But as a second stage, to a larger first stage, or the third stage of a slightly larger two stage to orbit RLV, the astronaut could be in a long- duration suit, 'lifting' an aerodynamic tank, filled with hydrogen/ oxygen that s/he would ride down to Mars surface, and then 'lift' back to Earth - and ride to a landing on Earth on their return. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inflatable Martian flyby spaceship | Michael Gallagher | Policy | 0 | December 4th 09 05:49 PM |
Bigelow's BA300 as a Martian spaceship? | Jim Relsh[_2_] | Policy | 24 | May 24th 08 10:35 PM |