|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Is this why we still do not have Selene L1
"KAGUYA"(SELENE), the big flop and still nothing Apollo to show for it
all. "KAGUYA"(SELENE) encounters our physically dark and extremely dusty moon at an angle of just 1 degree, and there’s no bounce, skip or hardly if any gouge, perhaps because the surface of this impact site was simply way too soft, as in tens of meters deep kind of crystal dry and electrostatic charged carbonado and basalt dust that’s saturated in all kinds of local minerals (including sodium) plus countless meteorite deposits. Lots of terrific private astronomy equipment had to be pointed at the carefully specified impact site with more than enough resolution and terrific dynamic range, not to mention the ten fold better stuff at the disposal of NASA, or the ten fold better yet from team KECK, or for that matter the greatly improved resolution, dynamic range and wide spectrum capability from Hubble. Of course at least the HDTV and its full color spectrum via KAGUYA should have functioned up to a fraction of a second or a frame or two prior to impact. Thus far we’ve got zip/nada/zilch to look at. Way to go JASA, NASA and other guys. Here’s an example of what a private astronomer can accomplish. http://www.avertedimagination.com/moon_1.htm http://www.avertedimagination.com/latest_1.htm http://www.avertedimagination.com/im...oon100407.html Just imagine what our NASA at 10 fold better can do, and KECK at least 100 fold better, as well as each of these in full/extended color saturation. Too bad we still do not have a science and astronomy platform of our best instruments at Selene L1 (must be because it's reserved for India or China). ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Is this why we still do not have Selene L1
On Apr 19, 4:44*pm, BradGuth wrote:
Perhaps any platform of science instruments and cameras covering multiple bandpass spectrums from IR to UV, including TRACE and OCO instrumentation as interactively parked within Selene L1, as intended for looking back at Earth or forbid that of our physically dark Selene/ moon, as such would only have been too gosh darn informative and otherwise truth revealing. “Lunar Smackdown” *http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exp...Smackdown.html *Notice how even though equal or far better resolution of the Apollo era existed, that never once was such a spacecraft or any kind of associated “smackdown” recorded and published for public review. *It’s as though our 100% public funded NASA and DARPA were being stingy “At 8:13 p.m. EST a 217-second S-IVB auxiliary propulsion system burn aimed the S-IVB for a lunar target point so accurately that another burn was not required. The S-IVB/IU impacted the lunar surface at 8:10 p.m. EST on April 14 at a speed of 259 meters per second. Impact was 137.1 kilometers from the Apollo 12 seismometer. The seismic signal generated by the impact lasted 3 hours 20 minutes and was so strong that a ground command was necessary to reduce seismometer gain and keep the recording on the scale. The suprathermal ion detector experiment, also deployed by the Apollo 12 crew, recorded a jump in the number of ions from zero at the time of impact up to 2,500 shortly thereafter and then back to a zero count. Scientists theorized that ionization had been produced by 6,300 K to 10,300 K (6,000 degrees C to 10,000 degrees C) temperature generated by the impact or that particles had reached an altitude of 60 kilometers from the lunar surface and had been ionized by sunlight.” LCROSS (impactor 901 kg) *http://lcross.arc.nasa.gov/mission.htm *http://lcross.arc.nasa.gov/docs/LCROSS_FS082108.pdf The Apollo era had multiple items of much greater mass impacting our moon, many of those having impacted at full velocity of 2.5 km/s, and yet our supposed “right stuff” never having obtained an image from nearby orbit or even that via any terrestrial based observations that should have been way more than sufficient, especially considering their inert mass and impact velocity. “Three days later the 30,700-pound (13,925 kilogram) hulk struck the lunar surface at 5,600 miles per hour (2.5 kilometers per second) some 74 miles (119 kilometers) west-northwest of the Apollo 12 landing site, releasing energy estimated as equivalent to the explosion of 7.7 tons (7,000 kilograms) of TNT.” “Several spent lunar module ascent stages and Saturn V S-IVB stages used in the Apollo missions were deliberately sent to impact the surface in order to test the effects of these artificial "meteorite" impacts on the seismometers. In all, four lunar modules and five Saturn upper stages were directed to the surface.” *And yet never a public published image of any such horrific impacts as they took place. *How odd, that we should need to conduct such repetitive science. Of somewhat further noteworthy interest: *Within the limited DR of a Nikon Coolpix 5000, darn if Mars doesn’t outshine our physically dark as coal Selene/moon (exactly as it should).http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...on_030717.html For some silly reason, out of all the thousands of unobstructed orbital obtained images with nothing but the very best of film and optics, and the same goes for all those tens of thousands of surface EVA obtained frames by way of all sorts of nifty cameras and video, that not once was there any hint of Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Mercury or even the extremely vibrant Venus above their physically dark as coal lunar surface. Of course by now there are thousands of amateur images, though badly impaired by way of our polluted and otherwise incoming photon deprived due to our spectrum filtering atmosphere, that which still managed to show us our Selene/moon along with those other items as unavoidably getting into the same FOV(frame of view). *Go far enough south, even down-under south of our equator and you can’t but help getting a good side by side perspectives of our moon including Sirius in the same FOV, and of course from orbiting or walking upon our physically dark moon is next to impossible to so entirely exclude Sirius and especially those pesky other planets from a few of those images, but none the less they had managed to do just that. Sirius A depicted as sufficiently relative to the brightness and color/ hue of other stars, along with the nearly invisible Sirius B of a false color, although our extremely nearby Selene/moon as clearly having to be an overexposed or that of an excess photon saturated simulation is what forces any computer simulated or composite image of our moon along with Sirius to look ultra white instead of being nearly as dark as coal. *Of course our NASA has far better simulators that would be 100% true and fully capable of giving us a complex simulated image of our moon along with Sirius within the same FOV. Here’s a wide field of view depicting *the Visible and X-ray images of our moon and Sirius in the very same FOV. *http://www.nmm.ac.uk/rog/2008/02/ Of course most any half-baked orbital simulator easily proves that from orbiting our moon it would have been technically impossible to entirely avoid getting Sirius and/or a few other items of planets in the same FOV as our physically dark as coal moon. *But then I suppose with “the right stuff” almost anything becomes possible. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Our NASA excluding and/or banishing all things pertaining to utilizing Selene L1, is not right. But then, we're not exactly the one and only game in town, so to speak. Perhaps ISRO can manage to pick up the slack. ~ BG |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Is this why we still do not have Selene L1
On Jun 14, 3:36*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Apr 19, 4:44*pm, BradGuth wrote: Perhaps any platform of science instruments and cameras covering multiple bandpass spectrums from IR to UV, including TRACE and OCO instrumentation as interactively parked within Selene L1, as intended for looking back at Earth or forbid that of our physically dark Selene/ moon, as such would only have been too gosh darn informative and otherwise truth revealing. “Lunar Smackdown” *http://www.airspacemag.com/space-exp...Smackdown.html *Notice how even though equal or far better resolution of the Apollo era existed, that never once was such a spacecraft or any kind of associated “smackdown” recorded and published for public review. *It’s as though our 100% public funded NASA and DARPA were being stingy “At 8:13 p.m. EST a 217-second S-IVB auxiliary propulsion system burn aimed the S-IVB for a lunar target point so accurately that another burn was not required. The S-IVB/IU impacted the lunar surface at 8:10 p.m. EST on April 14 at a speed of 259 meters per second. Impact was 137.1 kilometers from the Apollo 12 seismometer. The seismic signal generated by the impact lasted 3 hours 20 minutes and was so strong that a ground command was necessary to reduce seismometer gain and keep the recording on the scale. The suprathermal ion detector experiment, also deployed by the Apollo 12 crew, recorded a jump in the number of ions from zero at the time of impact up to 2,500 shortly thereafter and then back to a zero count. Scientists theorized that ionization had been produced by 6,300 K to 10,300 K (6,000 degrees C to 10,000 degrees C) temperature generated by the impact or that particles had reached an altitude of 60 kilometers from the lunar surface and had been ionized by sunlight.” LCROSS (impactor901kg) *http://lcross.arc.nasa.gov/mission.htm *http://lcross.arc.nasa.gov/docs/LCROSS_FS082108.pdf The Apollo era had multiple items of much greater mass impacting our moon, many of those having impacted at full velocity of 2.5 km/s, and yet our supposed “right stuff” never having obtained an image from nearby orbit or even that via any terrestrial based observations that should have been way more than sufficient, especially considering their inert mass and impact velocity. “Three days later the 30,700-pound (13,925 kilogram) hulk struck the lunar surface at 5,600 miles per hour (2.5 kilometers per second) some 74 miles (119 kilometers) west-northwest of the Apollo 12 landing site, releasing energy estimated as equivalent to the explosion of 7.7 tons (7,000 kilograms) of TNT.” “Several spent lunar module ascent stages and Saturn V S-IVB stages used in the Apollo missions were deliberately sent to impact the surface in order to test the effects of these artificial "meteorite" impacts on the seismometers. In all, four lunar modules and five Saturn upper stages were directed to the surface.” *And yet never a public published image of any such horrific impacts as they took place. *How odd, that we should need to conduct such repetitive science. Of somewhat further noteworthy interest: *Within the limited DR of a Nikon Coolpix 5000, darn if Mars doesn’t outshine our physically dark as coal Selene/moon (exactly as it should).http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...on_030717.html For some silly reason, out of all the thousands of unobstructed orbital obtained images with nothing but the very best of film and optics, and the same goes for all those tens of thousands of surface EVA obtained frames by way of all sorts of nifty cameras and video, that not once was there any hint of Mars,Jupiter, Saturn, Mercury or even the extremely vibrant Venus above their physically dark as coal lunar surface. Of course by now there are thousands of amateur images, though badly impaired by way of our polluted and otherwise incoming photon deprived due to our spectrum filtering atmosphere, that which still managed to show us our Selene/moon along with those other items as unavoidably getting into the same FOV(frame of view). *Go far enough south, even down-under south of our equator and you can’t but help getting a good side by side perspectives of our moon including Sirius in the same FOV, and of course from orbiting or walking upon our physically dark moon is next to impossible to so entirely exclude Sirius and especially those pesky other planets from a few of those images, but none the less they had managed to do just that. Sirius A depicted as sufficiently relative to the brightness and color/ hue of other stars, along with the nearly invisible Sirius B of a false color, although our extremely nearby Selene/moon as clearly having to be an overexposed or that of an excess photon saturated simulation is what forces any computer simulated or composite image of our moon along with Sirius to look ultra white instead of being nearly as dark as coal. *Of course our NASA has far better simulators that would be 100% true and fully capable of giving us a complex simulated image of our moon along with Sirius within the same FOV. Here’s a wide field of view depicting *the Visible and X-ray images of our moon and Sirius in the very same FOV. *http://www.nmm.ac.uk/rog/2008/02/ Of course most any half-baked orbital simulator easily proves that from orbiting our moon it would have been technically impossible to entirely avoid getting Sirius and/or a few other items of planets in the same FOV as our physically dark as coal moon. *But then I suppose with “the right stuff” almost anything becomes possible. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Our NASA excluding and/or banishing all things pertaining to utilizing Selene L1, is not right. But then, we're not exactly the one and only game in town, so to speak. *Perhaps ISRO can manage to pick up the slack. *~ BG So, why exactly is our Earth-moon L1 (Selene L1) being kept so unusually taboo/nondisclosure rated? Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Is this why we still do not have Selene L1
Why exactly is our Earth-moon L1 (Selene L1) being kept as so
unusually taboo/nondisclosure rated? According to the Apollo-13 documentation and their highly published storyline, there's hardly any bad kinds of radiation, and so little IR that they were at times freezing to death on their way back home, of which had to have included their trek back through the zero delta-V of the Earth-moon L1. Isn't such a nearby zero delta-V outpost/gateway (refueling OASIS) worth anything? Isn't the extreme vacuum of perhaps 3e-21 bar ( a millionth of what the lunar surface has to offer) of any value? It's also hard not to notice all the other silly/bogus topics going on and on, stacking their pointless context on top of anything else, so as to displace other topics which the mainstream status-quo doesn't approve of. *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this why we still do not have Selene L1 | BradGuth | History | 7 | April 13th 09 05:53 PM |
PLANET SELENE -- Imagenation, Last Walk on Selene... by the starswirler | Painius | Misc | 0 | November 18th 06 05:50 PM |
Planet Selene (The Moon) - #4. How does Selene "fit in"? | Painius | Misc | 7 | May 24th 06 06:11 PM |