A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Astro Pictures
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ASTRO: Two more very strange galaxies from the UGC catalog



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 23rd 12, 07:28 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.astro
Rick Johnson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,085
Default ASTRO: Two more very strange galaxies from the UGC catalog

UGC 6912 and UGC 6931 are two interesting galaxies in Ursa Major about 3
degrees west of the double star M 40. Redshift puts them about 67-70
and 62 million light-years away. The difference is likely smaller than
this indicates. They may be related in fact. I put UGC 6912 high to
pick up both UGC 6931 and the rather "cute" galaxy cluster WHL
J115556.3+575501 west of UGC 6912 at 2 billion light-years. NGC 6912 is
classed by NED as S?. It certainly looks disturbed and would seem to
deserve a pec label. I found virtually nothing on this one that
attempts to explain how it ended up this way. Seems some sort of recent
interaction must be involved. Did it involve UGC 6912? Or is it a
merger in progress? Or something else?

UGC 6912 is described in the CGPG catalog as: "Distorted blue
post-eruptive spiral, exploded core, blue knots on spiral
arm." It certainly has several parts. The VV catalog lists three
parts, other catalogs add other pieces. Only one had redshift data.
NED considers this Sloan object to be a separate galaxy rather than just
a bright knot in the galaxy that the other parts are. If true it seems
way too blue to be the core of a merging galaxy. UGC 6912 is classed by
NED as SBm with strong HII emission. So it is possible but not a
requirement that it has been disturbed by something in the past. I
found even less on this galaxy in the literature. SIMBAD lists one
paper under both of these UGC galaxies that is labeled "The gas content
of peculiar galaxies: Strongly interacting systems." I found no
reference to either in the paper however so don't quite understand the
connection.

The galaxy cluster WHL J115556.3+575501 at the bottom of my image at 2
billion light-years is listed as having 24 members. Just below it, out
of the frame is the core of the galaxy cluster Abell 1415 which is also
shown at 2 billion light years. It is listed as 20 minutes in diameter
and of class 1 which 1 which contains 30 to 49 members. So it appears
WHL J115556.3+575501 constitutes a major part of the cluster. It is
classed as BM III which means it has no dominant galaxy. A big cluster
galaxy isn't necessarily a dominant galaxy. Thus while WHL
J115556.3+575501 has a BCG at its location the cluster doesn't seem to
cluster around it.

There are two main ways of classifying galaxy clusters. BM as used here
and RS. BM I has one dominant galaxy in the center. Abell 2199 is a
common example. BM II has a pair of dominant galaxies at its core.
Think Coma Cluster. BM III has no central galaxy or galaxies. The RS
series is more complex. If there is one core galaxy at its center it is
labeled cD and the galaxy is a cD galaxy. B means a binary system. So
these are similar to the first two BM classes. But the RS system goes
further. L means a line of bright galaxies, C a core of more than 4
bright galaxies, F a flattened distribution (that is the cluster has an
even distribution not that it is flat like a piece of paper) and I for
irregular with no obvious core region with a blotchy distribution rather
than a "flat" one. That would be similar to many BM III clusters
including this one. BM is Bautz-Morgan and RS Rood-Sastry. Didn't help
much did it? There are other systems such as Zwicky type which is
simply Compact, Medium-Compact and Open. They can be classified by
shape: Spherical, Intermediate and Irregular for instance. Many others
can be found in the literature.

I've included the Sloan survey image of UGC 6912. They had even more
trouble with that blasted field star than I did.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10, RGB=2x10, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Rick
--
Prefix is correct. Domain is arvig dot net

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	UGC6912L4X10RGB2X10R.JPG
Views:	329
Size:	284.9 KB
ID:	4152  Click image for larger version

Name:	UGC6912L4X10RGB2X10R-ID.JPG
Views:	167
Size:	122.1 KB
ID:	4153  Click image for larger version

Name:	UGC6912L4X10RGB2X10R-CROP150.JPG
Views:	136
Size:	123.3 KB
ID:	4154  Click image for larger version

Name:	SSDS_UGC6912.jpg
Views:	173
Size:	22.0 KB
ID:	4155  
  #2  
Old June 24th 12, 09:10 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.astro
Stefan Lilge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,269
Default ASTRO: Two more very strange galaxies from the UGC catalog

Two detailed and interesting galaxies. And galaxy cluster WHL
J115556.3+575501 is neat indeed.

Stefan

"Rick Johnson" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
.com...
UGC 6912 and UGC 6931 are two interesting galaxies in Ursa Major about 3
degrees west of the double star M 40. Redshift puts them about 67-70
and 62 million light-years away. The difference is likely smaller than
this indicates. They may be related in fact. I put UGC 6912 high to
pick up both UGC 6931 and the rather "cute" galaxy cluster WHL
J115556.3+575501 west of UGC 6912 at 2 billion light-years. NGC 6912 is
classed by NED as S?. It certainly looks disturbed and would seem to
deserve a pec label. I found virtually nothing on this one that
attempts to explain how it ended up this way. Seems some sort of recent
interaction must be involved. Did it involve UGC 6912? Or is it a
merger in progress? Or something else?

UGC 6912 is described in the CGPG catalog as: "Distorted blue
post-eruptive spiral, exploded core, blue knots on spiral
arm." It certainly has several parts. The VV catalog lists three
parts, other catalogs add other pieces. Only one had redshift data.
NED considers this Sloan object to be a separate galaxy rather than just
a bright knot in the galaxy that the other parts are. If true it seems
way too blue to be the core of a merging galaxy. UGC 6912 is classed by
NED as SBm with strong HII emission. So it is possible but not a
requirement that it has been disturbed by something in the past. I
found even less on this galaxy in the literature. SIMBAD lists one
paper under both of these UGC galaxies that is labeled "The gas content
of peculiar galaxies: Strongly interacting systems." I found no
reference to either in the paper however so don't quite understand the
connection.

The galaxy cluster WHL J115556.3+575501 at the bottom of my image at 2
billion light-years is listed as having 24 members. Just below it, out
of the frame is the core of the galaxy cluster Abell 1415 which is also
shown at 2 billion light years. It is listed as 20 minutes in diameter
and of class 1 which 1 which contains 30 to 49 members. So it appears
WHL J115556.3+575501 constitutes a major part of the cluster. It is
classed as BM III which means it has no dominant galaxy. A big cluster
galaxy isn't necessarily a dominant galaxy. Thus while WHL
J115556.3+575501 has a BCG at its location the cluster doesn't seem to
cluster around it.

There are two main ways of classifying galaxy clusters. BM as used here
and RS. BM I has one dominant galaxy in the center. Abell 2199 is a
common example. BM II has a pair of dominant galaxies at its core.
Think Coma Cluster. BM III has no central galaxy or galaxies. The RS
series is more complex. If there is one core galaxy at its center it is
labeled cD and the galaxy is a cD galaxy. B means a binary system. So
these are similar to the first two BM classes. But the RS system goes
further. L means a line of bright galaxies, C a core of more than 4
bright galaxies, F a flattened distribution (that is the cluster has an
even distribution not that it is flat like a piece of paper) and I for
irregular with no obvious core region with a blotchy distribution rather
than a "flat" one. That would be similar to many BM III clusters
including this one. BM is Bautz-Morgan and RS Rood-Sastry. Didn't help
much did it? There are other systems such as Zwicky type which is
simply Compact, Medium-Compact and Open. They can be classified by
shape: Spherical, Intermediate and Irregular for instance. Many others
can be found in the literature.

I've included the Sloan survey image of UGC 6912. They had even more
trouble with that blasted field star than I did.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10, RGB=2x10, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Rick
--
Prefix is correct. Domain is arvig dot net



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASTRO: 2 Arp galaxies and a lot more Rick Johnson[_2_] Astro Pictures 3 November 9th 10 05:02 PM
ASTRO: The Strange Case of Arp 258 aka Hickson 18 Rick Johnson[_2_] Astro Pictures 0 September 15th 09 10:57 PM
ASTRO: Arp 107 A strange collision Rick Johnson[_2_] Astro Pictures 6 May 2nd 09 05:56 PM
Markarian catalog - galaxies or open clusters? [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 2 January 13th 09 09:09 AM
Astro program with SAO catalog to 9.5mag Szaki Amateur Astronomy 2 March 23rd 04 07:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.