A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fwd: Synopsis: Solar Down Time



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old November 3rd 12, 02:31 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,472
Default Fwd: Synopsis: Solar Down Time

On Oct 30, 5:55*am, (Paul Ciszek) wrote:
In article ,
Martin Brown wrote:









On 27/10/2012 02:50, Paul Ciszek wrote:
Every so often I hear about a theory that fusion is not continous in
the sun's core, that it starts and stops over periods of many years,
but the radiant output of the layer we see changes only slightly; i.e.,


If it did then you would not be able to tell from variations in surface
brightness. The time constant for a photon to diffuse out from the core
in a random walk is of the order of a million years or more.


there is a very large "time constant" involved. *Has this idea been
debunked?


There is a very large time constant involved for photons to escape, but
not for the neutrinos which are also a byproduct of nuclear reactions.


Observations of the neutrino flux from the sun suggest that it is pretty
steady and there is no obvious reason why it should not be. Although
some groups have suggested in reputable journals that there might be an
observable correlation with the sunspot cycle.


http://www.nature.com/nature/journal.../330353a0.html
(pay site but abstract is free - any good library should have Nature)


I suggest you stop reading sites with nonsense on them.


It wasn't a site, it was Larry Niven, which I suppose is worse.
And the suggestion was that the periods of fusion/no fusion lasted for
centuries, with the last interruption corresponding to the Little Ice
Age. *So, of course our observations of neutrino flux are constant--
we haven't been looking for neutrinos for very long.

--
"Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS
crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in
TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in
bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither."


These days for the most part teachers=NEA which is not good. AEBE,
the fewer public employees the better (ie smaller government, lower
taxes.) Planned Parenthood has some less-than-savory aspects, again
not good. NPR would not be missed. PBS -might- (or might not) help
improve the quality of broadcast TV, but one could get better content
and mores choices out of rented DVDs wrt science and education.

The banks lend money to keep businesses running, and the oil companies
provide energy that makes your way of life possible. If you have a
problem with oil spills you can help that by eliminating your own use
of fossil fuels.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Synopsis: Quantum Solution for Telescope Arrays Sam Wormley[_2_] Amateur Astronomy 2 August 20th 12 02:02 PM
Real time solar images -JATO Misc 0 July 4th 05 06:20 PM
Once Upon a Time= Solar System G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 2 May 28th 05 04:10 PM
Solar time versus TAI discrepancy Nick Maclaren Research 6 April 27th 04 02:47 PM
(OT) LORD Of The RINGS synopsis? Richard DeLuca Amateur Astronomy 48 January 21st 04 02:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.