News - NASA lunar mission gets off the ground

NASA lunar mission gets off the ground

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...72_nasa09.html

By Howard Witt

Chicago Tribune

CLEVELAND - With its heavy cranes, arc welders and steel rolling
machines, the nondescript metalworking shop in a hangar hard by the
runways at Cleveland's Hopkins Airport looks like countless other
industrial factories in this rustiest of Rust Belt cities.

But there's no mistaking the distinctive, white-painted, 5-ton steel
cylinder, 6 feet high and 18 feet across, that rests in the center of
the shop floor. It's a segment of a rocket, the first piece of a
prototype for America's newest launch vehicle - a rocket that is to
take astronauts back to the moon.

Swiftly, aggressively and largely unnoticed by the rest of the nation,
NASA has begun its next great manned spaceflight mission, the one that
is scheduled to revisit the moon by 2020 and establish a long-term
outpost there to serve as a stepping stone for an even bolder human
journey to Mars.

Here at NASA's Glenn Research Center and others across the country, a
new crew capsule is under development, new rocket engines are being
designed and new moon rovers are being created. The first test flight
of the new rocket is set to launch in just 30 months.

It has been more than a generation since America first lofted humans to
the moon and the nation's space agency had a mission capable of
capturing the public's imagination as the Apollo program did. But for
most Americans younger than 35, NASA has stood for little more than a
balky and dangerous space truck flying back and forth to a half-built
space station that methodically circles Earth every 90 minutes.

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is still committed to
flying the aging shuttles until their scheduled retirement in 2010 so
that construction on the long-delayed international space station can
be completed. But the real passion at the agency these days is the
Constellation program to return astronauts to the moon, a goal set by
President Bush in 2004 and given its initial funding by Congress a year
later. About 10 percent of the space agency's current budget, or $1.7
billion, and an estimated 20 percent of its brainpower are now devoted
to the Constellation program.

"This is where the excitement is," said Tony Lavoie, manager of the
Lunar Precursor and Robotic Program at NASA's Marshall Space Flight
Center in Alabama. "This is where the best minds in NASA want to be."

The project is moving remarkably fast, in part because it borrows from
designs and concepts proven during the Apollo and space shuttle
programs.

NASA has already determined, for example, that the new Orion crew
capsule, due to be flown for the first time by around 2012, will look a
lot like its Apollo predecessor, although it will be larger to
accommodate as many as six astronauts instead of three. The Ares rocket
that will launch it resembles one of the solid rocket boosters used to
launch the shuttle.

A second, larger cargo launch rocket, which will take aloft a new lunar
lander that will mate with the Orion capsule in Earth orbit before
heading on to the moon, is about the size of the Saturn V rockets of
the Apollo era but will make use of two shuttle-type solid rocket
boosters strapped on either side.

The main contract to build the crew capsule was awarded in August to
Lockheed Martin Corp., and astronauts are working with prototypes at
Houston's Johnson Space Center.

But despite the resemblance of some components to earlier missions,
Constellation is something very new - a program not merely to revisit
the moon but to establish a long-term, self-sustaining base there where
NASA can learn what it will take to send humans on even more dangerous,
years-long missions to Mars.

"We're not going to the moon just to do footprints again," said Tom
Sutliff, a manager at the Glenn Research Center in Cleveland. "We're
going to live off the land. It's much, much more than Apollo."

On 9 Nov 2006 10:31:24 -0800, "Rusty" wrote:

"We're not going to the moon just to do footprints again," said Tom
Sutliff, a manager at the Glenn Research Center in Cleveland. "We're
going to live off the land. It's much, much more than Apollo."

....I can see it now:

CDR: "I mean, I haven't eaten this much regolith in twenty years. And
I'll tell you one thing, in another 23 days, I ain't never eating any
more. And if they offer to serve me regolith or even anorthosite with
my breakfast, I'm going to throw up. I like an occasional brecchia, I
really do. But I'll be damned if I'm going to be buried in basalts!"

OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[