Two Theories One Universe for its Formation

Its the hot BB theory.Or the Steady State. Take your pick. When I was growing up Steady State was in.I go with the big bang. It had a starting point.Still I do not believe we are looking out from its center.Nor is it necessary.TreBert

On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 7:58:50 PM UTC-4, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Its the hot BB theory.Or the Steady State. Take your pick. When I was growing up Steady State was in.I go with the big bang. It had a starting point.Still I do not believe we are looking out from its center.Nor is it necessary.TreBert

I once read that the BB started out as a very small point outside of space and time. I find it difficult to imagine nothing; no space, no time. This small point must have been sitting somewhere.

On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:58:50 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Its the hot BB theory.Or the Steady State. Take your pick. When I was growing up Steady State was in.I go with the big bang. It had a starting point..Still I do not believe we are looking out from its center.Nor is it necessary.TreBert

Big Bang came out of quantum realm.Quantum gravity was its force to bring space energy (virtual) into the macro realm as real energy.My theory also tells you no explosion was needed,but it did save time. The first hour of the BB was its hour to create.TreBert

On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 10:44:45 AM UTC-4, HVAC wrote:
On 7/8/2015 5:28 AM, Steve wrote:

I once read that the BB started out as a very small point outside of
space and time. I find it difficult to imagine nothing; no space, no
time. This small point must have been sitting somewhere.


Since there was no space and no time, there was nowhere 'outside'.

We can describe with exquisite detail what happened after the big bang
banged. But we have no answers as to why. In fact 'why' may be a totally
rhetorical question. It very well may be an unanswerable question. I
just say '**** happens' and move on. Others like to pretend that they
know and claim that goddidit. Why they say this is beyond me. There is
zero evidence for god, so why just make one up?





There may not be a God; Christian, Jew, Muslim or otherwise, but there could be a creator. One philosopher stated that God was Evil. I tend to agree.

--
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 7:04:52 PM UTC-4, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:58:50 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Its the hot BB theory.Or the Steady State. Take your pick. When I was growing up Steady State was in.I go with the big bang. It had a starting point.Still I do not believe we are looking out from its center.Nor is it necessary.TreBert

Big Bang came out of quantum realm.Quantum gravity was its force to bring space energy (virtual) into the macro realm as real energy.My theory also tells you no explosion was needed,but it did save time. The first hour of the BB was its hour to create.TreBert

I don't see the big bang as being an explosion. It was a very fast expansion.

On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 4:44:58 PM UTC-7, Steve wrote:
On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 7:04:52 PM UTC-4, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 4:58:50 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Its the hot BB theory.Or the Steady State. Take your pick. When I was growing up Steady State was in.I go with the big bang. It had a starting point.Still I do not believe we are looking out from its center.Nor is it necessary.TreBert

Big Bang came out of quantum realm.Quantum gravity was its force to bring space energy (virtual) into the macro realm as real energy.My theory also tells you no explosion was needed,but it did save time. The first hour of the BB was its hour to create.TreBert

I don't see the big bang as being an explosion. It was a very fast expansion.

Nature uses explosions as a fast way to create all that is.BB goes with the speed of c.Einstein would agree TreBert