|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
LARSON -IAN Relativity; Einstein Was WRONG
6
LARSONIAN Relativity Einstein Was WRONG The perihelion point in the orbit of the planet Mercury has been observed and precisely measured to ADVANCE at the rate of about 574 seconds of arc per century. About 531 seconds of this advance are attributed via calculations to gravitational perturbations from the other planets (Venus, Earth, Jupiter, etc.). The remaining 43.5 seconds of arc are being used to help "prove" Einstein's "General Theory of Relativity". But the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson achieved results CLOSER (43.35 seconds) to the observed 43.5 seconds than "General Relativity" can (42.9 seconds), by INSTEAD using "SPECIAL Relativity". In one or more of his books, he applied a variation of the LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION on the HIGH ORBITAL SPEED of Mercury. This is also described on page 63 of "THE UNMYSTERIOUS UNIVERSE: An Introduction to D. B. Larson's NEW UNIFIED GENERAL THEORY", by Ronald W. Satz, 1971, which is an EXCELLENT 80-page SUMMARY of Larson's Theory. The technique described in that booklet should be used to calculate the apsidal motion of the binary system "DI HERCULIS", which seems to DISPROVE Einsteins "General Theory of Relativity" by showing an apsidal motion of only 1.05 degrees per century instead of the 4.27 degrees per century predicted by "General Relativity". (See "ASTRONOMY", November 1995, pages 54- 59, "Was Einstein Wrong? The Mystery of DI Herculis".) Larson TOTALLY REJECTED "General Relativity" as another MATHEMATICAL FANTASY. He also REJECTED most of "Special Relativity", including the parts about "mass increases" near the speed of light, and the use of the Lorentz Transform on doppler shifts, (Those quasars with red-shifts greater than 1.000 REALLY ARE MOVING FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT, although most of that motion is away from us IN TIME.). In Larson's comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the Physical Universe, there are THREE dimensions of time instead of only one. But two of those dimensions can NOT be measured from our material half of the Physical Universe. The one dimension that we CAN measure is the CLOCK time. At low relative speeds, the values of the other two dimensions are NEGLIGIBLE; but at high speeds, they become significant, and the Lorentz Transformation must be used as a FUDGE FACTOR. [Larson often used the term "COORDINATE TIME" when writing about this.] See also: http://members.aol.com/GalactcFed/universe.txt . A WEALTH of Information about the comprehensive GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the Physical Universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson can be found at the web site http://www.rstheory.com . Robert E. McElwaine B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC http://members.aol.com/rem547 PLUS http://members.aol.com/rem460 Preserve BOTH on CD-R and PRINT-OUTS ALSO http://www.geocities.com/remspiral7/ P.S.: PASS IT ON ! "EVERYTHING you know is WRONG." "The Truth IS STRANGER than fiction." "The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR." "OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL." "The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
LARSON -IAN Relativity; Einstein Was WRONG
wrote in message ... Larson TOTALLY REJECTED "General Relativity" as another MATHEMATICAL FANTASY. Then he was wrong. Without it you can't explain, for example, why clocks are affected by gravity - and many other experimentally confirmed things. Rest of rubbish snipped. Bill |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
LARSON -IAN Relativity; Einstein Was WRONG
wrote:
6 LARSONIAN Relativity Einstein Was WRONG [snip crap] 1) Experimental constraints on Special Relativity http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments.html 2) Experimental constraints on General Relativity http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2001-4/index.html http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039 3) Relativistic effects on orbital clocks http://relativity.livingreviews.org/...age=node5.html 4) Falling light http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9909014 Amer. J. Phys. 71 770 (2003) Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 121101 (2004) Nature 425 374-376 (2003). http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2006-3 , Figure 5 5) ****ing imbecile -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
LARSON -IAN Relativity; Einstein Was WRONG
"Uncle Al" wrote in message ... | wrote: | | 6 | LARSONIAN Relativity | Einstein Was WRONG | [snip crap] crap snipped. ****ING AND MOANING IDIOT ALERT!! ****ING AND MOANING IDIOT ALERT!! http://tinyurl.com/2g2ukd 20 Aug 2003, 21:16 | Hey stupid: | 1) Newton summing velocities, [V1 + V2] = V1 + V2 | 2) Special Relativity summing velocities, [V1 + V2] = (V1 + V2)/[1 +(V1)(V2)/c^2] | There's the math. Now you can **** and moan about an inertial observer. | We'll proactively play it your way, asshole. -- Schwartz****. HEY ****HEAD! We'll proactively play it your way, ****. | [@] Among the reasons it is unphysical is the fact that the | composition of two velocities to the right can result in a | velocity to the left. Another reason is that "time" acts | just like "space". Neither of these are true in the world | we inhabit. | | | Tom Roberts No aether. No ****ing aether. NO ****IN' AETHER. NO ****ING AETHER, DUMB****! NO GODDAMN ****ING AETHER, YOU USELESS PILE OF ****! TAKE YOUR POXY AETHER AND SHOVE IT UP YER ARSE, YOU MORON!! http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ic/brokpen.jpg The pencil is broken. Don't like empirical observations, Schwartz****? ****head. Catch 22: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img22.gif http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img76.gif "BTW, you ****-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper, nor could it. Hey Schwartz****, you are an ineducable idiot. Your high school should be leveled and replaced by an abandoned bowling alley." http://tinyurl.com/3pwu |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
LARSON -IAN Relativity; Einstein Was WRONG
Androcles wrote:
[snip crap] Nothing. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
LARSON -IAN Relativity; Einstein Was WRONG
"Uncle Al" wrote in message ... | Androcles wrote: | [snip crap] | | Nothing. That's right, it was all the nothing crap you wrote. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 962 | December 17th 07 12:45 PM |
THE OFFICIAL END OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 11 | November 21st 07 07:58 PM |
Documentary on Einstein Wrong | mcwilliams | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 21st 07 08:44 PM |
CRITICS OF RELATIVITY WRONG, A PROPONENT RIGHT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 15 | June 28th 07 07:33 AM |
LARSON -IAN Relativity, Einstein Was WRONG | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | January 30th 07 04:55 PM |