A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Light Falls in Gravitational Field and Disproves Einstein



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 29th 18, 03:41 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,800
Default Light Falls in Gravitational Field and Disproves Einstein

"If we accept the principle of equivalence, we must also accept that light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as material bodies." http://sethi.lamar.edu/bahrim-cristi...t-lens_PPT.pdf

If so, Soldner (Newton) was right about bending of light. Einstein was wrong. Eddington was a cheat:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Db84DP7XkAMXC9D.jpg

The Pound-Rebka experiment

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Db84fv2XkAEk1YT.png

confirmed Newton's variable speed of light - see the 4th paragraph he http://virgo.lal.in2p3.fr/NPAC/relat...iers/pound.pdf

Newton's variable speed of light is incompatible with gravitational time dilation. This means that the Pound-Rebka experiment falsified general relativity. Idiocy:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZb64eLWsAArJ7m.jpg

Pentcho Valev
Ads
  #2  
Old April 30th 18, 10:52 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,800
Default Light Falls in Gravitational Field and Disproves Einstein

That the speed of falling light varies like the speed of ordinary falling bodies is so obvious that many Einsteinians confirm the fact, explicitly or implicitly, and so unwittingly disprove Einstein's relativity:

"If we accept the principle of equivalence, we must also accept that light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as material bodies." http://sethi.lamar.edu/bahrim-cristi...t-lens_PPT.pdf

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: "Consider a falling object. ITS SPEED INCREASES AS IT IS FALLING. Hence, if we were to associate a frequency with that object the frequency should increase accordingly as it falls to earth. Because of the equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass, WE SHOULD OBSERVE THE SAME EFFECT FOR LIGHT. So lets shine a light beam from the top of a very tall building. If we can measure the frequency shift as the light beam descends the building, we should be able to discern how gravity affects a falling light beam. This was done by Pound and Rebka in 1960. They shone a light from the top of the Jefferson tower at Harvard and measured the frequency shift. The frequency shift was tiny but in agreement with the theoretical prediction. Consider a light beam that is travelling away from a gravitational field. Its frequency should shift to lower values. This is known as the gravitational red shift of light." https://courses.physics.illinois.edu...re13/L13r.html

Albert Einstein Institute: "One of the three classical tests for general relativity is the gravitational redshift of light or other forms of electromagnetic radiation. However, in contrast to the other two tests - the gravitational deflection of light and the relativistic perihelion shift -, you do not need general relativity to derive the correct prediction for the gravitational redshift. A combination of Newtonian gravity, a particle theory of light, and the weak equivalence principle (gravitating mass equals inertial mass) suffices. [...] The gravitational redshift was first measured on earth in 1960-65 by Pound, Rebka, and Snider at Harvard University..." http://www.einstein-online.info/spot...te_dwarfs.html

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Variable Speed of Light Particles in Gravitational Field Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 September 14th 17 02:45 PM
LIGHT IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD : NO PLACE FOR EINSTEIN Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 June 11th 14 09:52 PM
EINSTEINIANA: SPEED OF LIGHT IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 7 December 11th 11 11:09 PM
VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 30 August 3rd 08 01:10 AM
gravitational-wave sources (was: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?) brian a m stuckless Policy 0 February 2nd 06 07:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.