A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 22nd 14, 05:22 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Rocky[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default 9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon

9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/02/911-update-more-proof-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/


While the above article goes into a lot of depth about how a 757 could not
fly as low as it was supposed to fly to fly into the Pentagon the fact
remains real jets break into pieces instead of vanish into buildings, vanish
into a round hole in a building or vanish into the ground without changing
the landscape of the ground.

To me it isn't that we were obviously lied to about what happened to the
Pentagon but what happened in every single aspect of 9/11 like why so little
remained of the Twin Towers when only a nuke or two nukes as I recently
learned could do what was done to the Twin Towers.


  #2  
Old December 22nd 14, 06:23 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default 9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon

"Rocky" wrote in message
...

9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/02/911-update-more-proof-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/


While the above article goes into a lot of depth about how a 757 could
not
fly as low as it was supposed to fly to fly into the Pentagon

snip insanity laced Wocky drivel

*** You ignorant **** ... ANY damn airplane flies that low
whenever it comes in for a landing ... didn't thing of that,
did ya, you demented lunatic ... plus the fact that the
rag-head Terrorists who piloted the plane(s) were hell
bent on getting their allotment of 72 virgins ...

  #3  
Old December 22nd 14, 06:47 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Rocky[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default 9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon


"Hägar" wrote in message
...
"Rocky" wrote in message
...

9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/02/911-update-more-proof-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/


While the above article goes into a lot of depth about how a 757 could not
fly as low as it was supposed to fly to fly into the Pentagon

snip insanity laced Wocky drivel

*** You ignorant **** ... ANY damn airplane flies that low
whenever it comes in for a landing ... didn't thing of that,
did ya, you demented lunatic ... plus the fact that the
rag-head Terrorists who piloted the plane(s) were hell
bent on getting their allotment of 72 virgins ...


ROTFLMAO because you failed to mention how fast jets go when they land, how
fast jets go at sea level when they start to fly apart and how fast the
alleged jet went that flew into a small hole in the Pentagon. G

This video shows how long the alleged Flight 77 was overspeed or at a speed
when a 757 starts to fly apart:
MSFS 911 Pentagon Simulation - video1
http://youtu.be/nWSc5V_Bwh8?t=5m20s

The following video helps show the absurdity of a 757 flying into the
Pentagon:
9/11 - The Pentagon: Flight 77? [Ripple Effect]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qACXKEVFjQg

Rocky


  #4  
Old December 22nd 14, 09:38 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Dean Markley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 515
Default 9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon

On Monday, December 22, 2014 12:47:27 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
"Hägar" wrote in message
...
"Rocky" wrote in message
...

9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/02/911-update-more-proof-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/


While the above article goes into a lot of depth about how a 757 could not
fly as low as it was supposed to fly to fly into the Pentagon

snip insanity laced Wocky drivel

*** You ignorant **** ... ANY damn airplane flies that low
whenever it comes in for a landing ... didn't thing of that,
did ya, you demented lunatic ... plus the fact that the
rag-head Terrorists who piloted the plane(s) were hell
bent on getting their allotment of 72 virgins ...


ROTFLMAO because you failed to mention how fast jets go when they land, how
fast jets go at sea level when they start to fly apart and how fast the
alleged jet went that flew into a small hole in the Pentagon. G

This video shows how long the alleged Flight 77 was overspeed or at a speed
when a 757 starts to fly apart:
MSFS 911 Pentagon Simulation - video1
http://youtu.be/nWSc5V_Bwh8?t=5m20s

The following video helps show the absurdity of a 757 flying into the
Pentagon:
9/11 - The Pentagon: Flight 77? [Ripple Effect]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qACXKEVFjQg

Rocky


Have you always been a nutcase?
  #5  
Old December 22nd 14, 09:48 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Rocky[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default 9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon


"Dean Markley" wrote in message
...
On Monday, December 22, 2014 12:47:27 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
"Hägar" wrote in message
...
"Rocky" wrote in message
...

9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/02/911-update-more-proof-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/


While the above article goes into a lot of depth about how a 757 could
not
fly as low as it was supposed to fly to fly into the Pentagon

snip insanity laced Wocky drivel

*** You ignorant **** ... ANY damn airplane flies that low
whenever it comes in for a landing ... didn't thing of that,
did ya, you demented lunatic ... plus the fact that the
rag-head Terrorists who piloted the plane(s) were hell
bent on getting their allotment of 72 virgins ...


ROTFLMAO because you failed to mention how fast jets go when they land,
how
fast jets go at sea level when they start to fly apart and how fast the
alleged jet went that flew into a small hole in the Pentagon. G

This video shows how long the alleged Flight 77 was overspeed or at a
speed
when a 757 starts to fly apart:
MSFS 911 Pentagon Simulation - video1
http://youtu.be/nWSc5V_Bwh8?t=5m20s

The following video helps show the absurdity of a 757 flying into the
Pentagon:
9/11 - The Pentagon: Flight 77? [Ripple Effect]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qACXKEVFjQg

Rocky


Have you always been a nutcase?

==============

Have you always worked for our government as a shill?

BTW do not forget what NNSA stands for and why are the NNSA photographed in
the following site wearing items used to protect them from radiation?:

The Pentagon: Hit by Flying Desks?
http://www.nc911truth.org/foto/desks.html

Rocky


  #6  
Old December 23rd 14, 11:45 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default 9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon



Hägar wrote:
"Rocky" wrote in message
...

9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/02/911-update-more-proof-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/


While the above article goes into a lot of depth about how a 757 could
not
fly as low as it was supposed to fly to fly into the Pentagon

snip insanity laced Wocky drivel

*** You ignorant **** ... ANY damn airplane flies that low
whenever it comes in for a landing ... didn't thing of that,
did ya, you demented lunatic ... plus the fact that the
rag-head Terrorists who piloted the plane(s) were hell
bent on getting their allotment of 72 virgins ...








911 was an inside job.

So how many jets come in to land and touch the ground at 500 MPH ????
Go back to your single-wide and at least TRY to reason it out, that G.W
lied to you.,... while he had his DICK Cheney in your mouth

Oh and have a Merry Christmas,.. JESUS IS THE REASON FOR THE SEASON.



  #7  
Old December 23rd 14, 04:12 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Rocky[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default 9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon

ROTFLMAO because I told you before Sually to get that mirror out of your
face.

And never forget real jets break into pieces on impact yet none of the jets
involved in 9/11 did because they were all just stories of jets where two
flights were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01 and the other two landed
in Ohio instead.

Rocky

"Saul Levy" wrote in message
...
AFRAID SO, Dean, THE WOOKSTER IS A ****ING WACKO NUTJOB!

Saul Levy


On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:38:18 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
wrote:

On Monday, December 22, 2014 12:47:27 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
"Hägar" wrote in message
...
"Rocky" wrote in message
...

9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/02/911-update-more-proof-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/

While the above article goes into a lot of depth about how a 757 could
not
fly as low as it was supposed to fly to fly into the Pentagon

snip insanity laced Wocky drivel

*** You ignorant **** ... ANY damn airplane flies that low
whenever it comes in for a landing ... didn't thing of that,
did ya, you demented lunatic ... plus the fact that the
rag-head Terrorists who piloted the plane(s) were hell
bent on getting their allotment of 72 virgins ...

ROTFLMAO because you failed to mention how fast jets go when they land,
how
fast jets go at sea level when they start to fly apart and how fast the
alleged jet went that flew into a small hole in the Pentagon. G

This video shows how long the alleged Flight 77 was overspeed or at a
speed
when a 757 starts to fly apart:
MSFS 911 Pentagon Simulation - video1
http://youtu.be/nWSc5V_Bwh8?t=5m20s

The following video helps show the absurdity of a 757 flying into the
Pentagon:
9/11 - The Pentagon: Flight 77? [Ripple Effect]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qACXKEVFjQg

Rocky


Have you always been a nutcase?



  #8  
Old December 23rd 14, 11:38 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Rocky[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 429
Default 9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon

And your reason why so very little remained of the Twin Towers on 9/11 was
what? G

You can't talk about truth because you have none. You have to face it you
have been zoned out by your television.

Rocky


"Saul Levy" wrote in message
...
THE TRUTH SELLS YOU OUT, WOOK!

YOU ARE AN IDIOT!

Saul Levy


On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:12:16 -0600, "Rocky" wrote:

ROTFLMAO because I told you before Sually to get that mirror out of your
face.

And never forget real jets break into pieces on impact yet none of the
jets
involved in 9/11 did because they were all just stories of jets where two
flights were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01 and the other two landed
in Ohio instead.

Rocky

"Saul Levy" wrote in message
. ..
AFRAID SO, Dean, THE WOOKSTER IS A ****ING WACKO NUTJOB!

Saul Levy


On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:38:18 -0800 (PST), Dean Markley
wrote:

On Monday, December 22, 2014 12:47:27 PM UTC-5, Rocky wrote:
"Hägar" wrote in message
...
"Rocky" wrote in message
...

9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/02/911-update-more-proof-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/

While the above article goes into a lot of depth about how a 757
could
not
fly as low as it was supposed to fly to fly into the Pentagon

snip insanity laced Wocky drivel

*** You ignorant **** ... ANY damn airplane flies that low
whenever it comes in for a landing ... didn't thing of that,
did ya, you demented lunatic ... plus the fact that the
rag-head Terrorists who piloted the plane(s) were hell
bent on getting their allotment of 72 virgins ...

ROTFLMAO because you failed to mention how fast jets go when they
land,
how
fast jets go at sea level when they start to fly apart and how fast
the
alleged jet went that flew into a small hole in the Pentagon. G

This video shows how long the alleged Flight 77 was overspeed or at a
speed
when a 757 starts to fly apart:
MSFS 911 Pentagon Simulation - video1
http://youtu.be/nWSc5V_Bwh8?t=5m20s

The following video helps show the absurdity of a 757 flying into the
Pentagon:
9/11 - The Pentagon: Flight 77? [Ripple Effect]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qACXKEVFjQg

Rocky

Have you always been a nutcase?



  #9  
Old December 24th 14, 02:08 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Arc Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,480
Default 9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon

On Monday, December 22, 2014 8:22:53 AM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:
9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon



Retard, below is proof that the commenter is a retard, as you are a retard. The object comes down at an angle as the surveillance video captures, so building height is not a factor here. And on ur building 7 collapses, the World Trade Tower came down cutting have of its front-side off and started a huge internal fire that compromised the whole buildings, lower 'supports,' duffas brains.


what do u want Bushes arrested? The Dumbochumps and Retardians love this evil family. So what is your point? To convince people the Bushes are EVIL? I think already everyone knows.


"This article explains why high-speed flight in relatively close proximity to the ground [as for Flight 77] is virtually impossible - in any fixed-wing aircraft"-An Aeronautical Engineer

Among the most important proofs that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon is that the official trajectory -- barely skimming the ground at over 500 mph and taking out a series of lampposts -- is both aerodynamically and physically impossible.

I have argued in the past that it is aerodynamically impossible because ground effect would not allow a 757 flying at that speed to get closer than 60 or even 80 feet to the ground, where 80 feet is higher than the Pentagon at 71 feet is tall.
  #10  
Old December 24th 14, 03:46 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default 9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon



Arc Michael wrote:
On Monday, December 22, 2014 8:22:53 AM UTC-8, Rocky wrote:
9/11 Update: More proof no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon



Retard, below is proof that the commenter is a retard, as you are a
retard. The object comes down at an angle as the surveillance video
captures, so building height is not a factor here. And on ur building 7
collapses, the World Trade Tower came down cutting have of its
front-side off and started a huge internal fire that compromised the
whole buildings, lower 'supports,' duffas brains.





HAVE ???
Of course you HAVE even one photo of this alleged damage to WTC 7, which you
claim was plainly visible for hours before it got depressed and fell for no
apparent reason ?

No ?
I thought not.
None of you "official 9/11 fairytailers" ever does.

9/11 WAS an inside job.






what do u want Bushes arrested? The Dumbochumps and Retardians love
this evil family. So what is your point? To convince people the Bushes
are EVIL? I think already everyone knows.


"This article explains why high-speed flight in relatively close
proximity to the ground [as for Flight 77] is virtually impossible - in
any fixed-wing aircraft"-An Aeronautical Engineer

Among the most important proofs that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon is
that the official trajectory -- barely skimming the ground at over 500
mph and taking out a series of lampposts -- is both aerodynamically and
physically impossible.

I have argued in the past that it is aerodynamically impossible because
ground effect would not allow a 757 flying at that speed to get closer
than 60 or even 80 feet to the ground, where 80 feet is higher than the
Pentagon at 71 feet is tall.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Special Relativity proof Chapt9 Proof that Doppler shift isnonexistent in light-waves #46 Atom Totality theory 5th ed. Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 21 October 13th 11 09:26 PM
Debunked by Proof: Einstein's Relativity Theory Is Wrong! - PROOF #1 qbit Astronomy Misc 6 August 9th 07 04:04 PM
Proof Pentagon Was Hit With A Missile On 9-11 http://peaceinspace.com Misc 2 April 2nd 06 03:30 PM
Pentagon may transfer FIA from Boeing to Lockmart Allen Thomson Policy 8 October 25th 05 12:02 AM
Since Boeing and LM are partnering 50/50 and Boeing already has Delta IV Heavy does that mean we'll never see the Atlas V Heavy? D. Scott Ferrin History 5 May 6th 05 05:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.