|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Venus has no water.
"Double-A" wrote in message
... On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:21:03 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote: On Monday, August 25, 2014 6:53:08 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message ... On Monday, August 25, 2014 5:13:17 AM UTC-7, Dean Markley wrote: On Friday, August 22, 2014 11:57:14 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote: Actually, Venus has teratonnes of water, but never a drop for the always dumbfounded likes of yourself. And where is this water? Mostly suspended within those clouds, although being continually resupplied via geothermal vents is a perfectly natural process, exactly as here on Earth and of most every other planet, planetoid and moon. Are you suggesting that the planet Venus is cooler and a lot more inert than Earth inside? *** The water content in the atmosphere of Venus is 20 ppm; if you're too stupid to digest that, it means 20 parts per million ... take that in, Goth ... 20 parts per ****ing MILLION ... It would take three cubic miles to mix a scotch and water, you nonsense yammering baboon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Venus Dream on, you clueless wonder ... Except those are not actually white fluffy clouds of inert crystal dry dust. We've been told over and over how terribly dense and acidic them clouds and their atmosphere supposedly are. If they were of only 20 ppm water, they'd be of nothing but perfectly harmless inert dust clouds. In other words, mainstream science isn't always interpreted for the benefit of others, just like you, GW Bush and Dick Cheney got to interpret a firetruck at better than .1 m resolution, as a WMD. Do you need more analogy examples? It is said that Venus probably has an ocean of liquid carbon dioxide. So the old idea of Venus as an ocean planet may be true after all. The air in the upper atmosphere is said to be cool at comfortable Earth levels. Also it might even be breathable because of the fact that oxygen and nitrogen rise to the top! Double-A *** It just amazes me that you two numb-nutzes think you have the scientific, the engineering and the geological wherewithal to speculate what the surface of Venus has to offer, when only a few grainy pictures exist from vintage Soviet probes that met their fiery demise soon after touchdown. It is yet another demonstration of the delusions of grandeur which afflict you two halfwits. Artificial Structures and CO2 lakes ... too much. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Venus has no water.
On Monday, August 25, 2014 2:56:45 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message ... On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:21:03 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote: On Monday, August 25, 2014 6:53:08 AM UTC-7, H�gar wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message ... On Monday, August 25, 2014 5:13:17 AM UTC-7, Dean Markley wrote: On Friday, August 22, 2014 11:57:14 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote: Actually, Venus has teratonnes of water, but never a drop for the always dumbfounded likes of yourself. And where is this water? Mostly suspended within those clouds, although being continually resupplied via geothermal vents is a perfectly natural process, exactly as here on Earth and of most every other planet, planetoid and moon. Are you suggesting that the planet Venus is cooler and a lot more inert than Earth inside? *** The water content in the atmosphere of Venus is 20 ppm; if you're too stupid to digest that, it means 20 parts per million ... take that in, Goth ... 20 parts per ****ing MILLION ... It would take three cubic miles to mix a scotch and water, you nonsense yammering baboon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Venus Dream on, you clueless wonder ... Except those are not actually white fluffy clouds of inert crystal dry dust. We've been told over and over how terribly dense and acidic them clouds and their atmosphere supposedly are. If they were of only 20 ppm water, they'd be of nothing but perfectly harmless inert dust clouds. In other words, mainstream science isn't always interpreted for the benefit of others, just like you, GW Bush and Dick Cheney got to interpret a firetruck at better than .1 m resolution, as a WMD. Do you need more analogy examples? It is said that Venus probably has an ocean of liquid carbon dioxide. So the old idea of Venus as an ocean planet may be true after all. The air in the upper atmosphere is said to be cool at comfortable Earth levels. Also it might even be breathable because of the fact that oxygen and nitrogen rise to the top! Double-A *** It just amazes me that you two numb-nutzes think you have the scientific, the engineering and the geological wherewithal to speculate what the surface of Venus has to offer, when only a few grainy pictures exist from vintage Soviet probes that met their fiery demise soon after touchdown. It is yet another demonstration of the delusions of grandeur which afflict you two halfwits. Artificial Structures and CO2 lakes ... too much. I am truly sorry you are not able to comprehend our level of discussions, Hagar. Try not inhaling so deeply the methane gas from that sewer lagoon. Double-A |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Venus has no water.
On Monday, August 25, 2014 1:15:14 PM UTC-7, Dean Markley wrote:
On Monday, August 25, 2014 3:21:03 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote: On Monday, August 25, 2014 6:53:08 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message ... On Monday, August 25, 2014 5:13:17 AM UTC-7, Dean Markley wrote: On Friday, August 22, 2014 11:57:14 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote: Actually, Venus has teratonnes of water, but never a drop for the always dumbfounded likes of yourself. And where is this water? Mostly suspended within those clouds, although being continually resupplied via geothermal vents is a perfectly natural process, exactly as here on Earth and of most every other planet, planetoid and moon. Are you suggesting that the planet Venus is cooler and a lot more inert than Earth inside? *** The water content in the atmosphere of Venus is 20 ppm; if you're too stupid to digest that, it means 20 parts per million ... take that in, Goth ... 20 parts per ****ing MILLION ... It would take three cubic miles to mix a scotch and water, you nonsense yammering baboon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Venus Dream on, you clueless wonder ... Except those are not actually white fluffy clouds of inert crystal dry dust. We've been told over and over how terribly dense and acidic them clouds and their atmosphere supposedly are. If they were of only 20 ppm water, they'd be of nothing but perfectly harmless inert dust clouds. In other words, mainstream science isn't always interpreted for the benefit of others, just like you, GW Bush and Dick Cheney got to interpret a firetruck at better than .1 m resolution, as a WMD. Do you need more analogy examples? Are you suggesting because the clouds on Venus are "white and fluffy" that they are water vapor? LMAO! And right there is proof you are no scientist. Again; clouds of dry dust? If you are representing the scientist, then do tell; how can its environment be considered as acidic or much less corrosive without water? Sounds to me that 20 ppm H2O is kinda inert or downright passive, and that's actually a very good thing. With molecular sieves and basic water recycling being old-hat technology, who the hell needs even 20 ppm? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Venus has no water.
On Monday, August 25, 2014 2:16:26 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:21:03 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote: In other words, mainstream science isn't always interpreted for the benefit of others, just like you, GW Bush and Dick Cheney got to interpret a firetruck at better than .1 m resolution, as a WMD. Do you need more analogy examples? It is said that Venus probably has an ocean of liquid carbon dioxide. So the old idea of Venus as an ocean planet may be true after all. The air in the upper atmosphere is said to be cool at comfortable Earth levels. Also it might even be breathable because of the fact that oxygen and nitrogen rise to the top! Double-A There certainly is more O2 and H2O within them clouds than near its geothermal heated surface. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Venus has no water.
On Monday, August 25, 2014 2:56:45 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
*** It just amazes me that you two numb-nutzes think you have the scientific, the engineering and the geological wherewithal to speculate what the surface of Venus has to offer, when only a few grainy pictures exist from vintage Soviet probes that met their fiery demise soon after touchdown. It is yet another demonstration of the delusions of grandeur which afflict you two halfwits. Artificial Structures and CO2 lakes ... too much. Only Russian probes have been to its surface, plus a few others as having been taken there by ETs. At -5km, it's atmosphere of mostly CO2 is nearly if not liquid phase. BTW, those Russian probes had no such "fiery demise". They actually performed quite nicely, as designed and as expected. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Venus has no water.
On Monday, August 25, 2014 3:27:24 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Monday, August 25, 2014 2:56:45 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote: *** It just amazes me that you two numb-nutzes think you have the scientific, the engineering and the geological wherewithal to speculate what the surface of Venus has to offer, when only a few grainy pictures exist from vintage Soviet probes that met their fiery demise soon after touchdown. It is yet another demonstration of the delusions of grandeur which afflict you two halfwits. Artificial Structures and CO2 lakes .... too much. I am truly sorry you are not able to comprehend our level of discussions, Hagar. Try not inhaling so deeply the methane gas from that sewer lagoon. Double-A The atmosphere below 16 km is relatively dry because it's so freaking hot. At least I've never suggested otherwise. Poor Hagar (like most Jews) can't get over himself. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Venus has no water.
On Monday, August 25, 2014 5:16:26 PM UTC-4, Double-A wrote:
On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:21:03 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote: On Monday, August 25, 2014 6:53:08 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message ... On Monday, August 25, 2014 5:13:17 AM UTC-7, Dean Markley wrote: On Friday, August 22, 2014 11:57:14 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote: Actually, Venus has teratonnes of water, but never a drop for the always dumbfounded likes of yourself. And where is this water? Mostly suspended within those clouds, although being continually resupplied via geothermal vents is a perfectly natural process, exactly as here on Earth and of most every other planet, planetoid and moon. Are you suggesting that the planet Venus is cooler and a lot more inert than Earth inside? *** The water content in the atmosphere of Venus is 20 ppm; if you're too stupid to digest that, it means 20 parts per million ... take that in, Goth ... 20 parts per ****ing MILLION ... It would take three cubic miles to mix a scotch and water, you nonsense yammering baboon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Venus Dream on, you clueless wonder ... Except those are not actually white fluffy clouds of inert crystal dry dust. We've been told over and over how terribly dense and acidic them clouds and their atmosphere supposedly are. If they were of only 20 ppm water, they'd be of nothing but perfectly harmless inert dust clouds. In other words, mainstream science isn't always interpreted for the benefit of others, just like you, GW Bush and Dick Cheney got to interpret a firetruck at better than .1 m resolution, as a WMD. Do you need more analogy examples? It is said that Venus probably has an ocean of liquid carbon dioxide. So the old idea of Venus as an ocean planet may be true after all. The air in the upper atmosphere is said to be cool at comfortable Earth levels. Also it might even be breathable because of the fact that oxygen and nitrogen rise to the top! Double-A Who is this "it"? There is no ocean of liquid CO2 on Venus. The phase diagrams for CO2 at Venusian temps and pressures clearly eliminate that possibility. And then there are accurate radar observations form Earth and orbiting probes that clearly show a hot, dry, solid surface. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Venus has no water.
On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 1:01:20 AM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On Monday, August 25, 2014 1:15:14 PM UTC-7, Dean Markley wrote: On Monday, August 25, 2014 3:21:03 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote: On Monday, August 25, 2014 6:53:08 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote: "Brad Guth" wrote in message ... On Monday, August 25, 2014 5:13:17 AM UTC-7, Dean Markley wrote: On Friday, August 22, 2014 11:57:14 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote: Actually, Venus has teratonnes of water, but never a drop for the always dumbfounded likes of yourself. And where is this water? Mostly suspended within those clouds, although being continually resupplied via geothermal vents is a perfectly natural process, exactly as here on Earth and of most every other planet, planetoid and moon.. Are you suggesting that the planet Venus is cooler and a lot more inert than Earth inside? *** The water content in the atmosphere of Venus is 20 ppm; if you're too stupid to digest that, it means 20 parts per million ... take that in, Goth ... 20 parts per ****ing MILLION ... It would take three cubic miles to mix a scotch and water, you nonsense yammering baboon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Venus Dream on, you clueless wonder ... Except those are not actually white fluffy clouds of inert crystal dry dust. We've been told over and over how terribly dense and acidic them clouds and their atmosphere supposedly are. If they were of only 20 ppm water, they'd be of nothing but perfectly harmless inert dust clouds. In other words, mainstream science isn't always interpreted for the benefit of others, just like you, GW Bush and Dick Cheney got to interpret a firetruck at better than .1 m resolution, as a WMD. Do you need more analogy examples? Are you suggesting because the clouds on Venus are "white and fluffy" that they are water vapor? LMAO! And right there is proof you are no scientist. Again; clouds of dry dust? If you are representing the scientist, then do tell; how can its environment be considered as acidic or much less corrosive without water? Sounds to me that 20 ppm H2O is kinda inert or downright passive, and that's actually a very good thing. With molecular sieves and basic water recycling being old-hat technology, who the hell needs even 20 ppm? Once again, Brad, your lack of science is showing. Acidity and corrosivity need not be dependent on water. Yes, I agree there are tiny amounts of water vapor high in the Venusian atmosphere. I also note that you eluded the question I posed you which is another of your habits when you get called out. And then there's your continuing habit of tossing in technical terms (molecular sieves) that have nothing to do with the discussion. That is called distraction and only works on your fellow ignoramuses. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Venus has no water.
"Dean Markley" wrote in message
... On Monday, August 25, 2014 5:16:26 PM UTC-4, Double-A wrote: On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:21:03 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote: snipped to reduce my carbon footprint, heh It is said that Venus probably has an ocean of liquid carbon dioxide. So the old idea of Venus as an ocean planet may be true after all. The air in the upper atmosphere is said to be cool at comfortable Earth levels. Also it might even be breathable because of the fact that oxygen and nitrogen rise to the top! Double-A Who is this "it"? There is no ocean of liquid CO2 on Venus. The phase diagrams for CO2 at Venusian temps and pressures clearly eliminate that possibility. And then there are accurate radar observations form Earth and orbiting probes that clearly show a hot, dry, solid surface. *** You really should stop citing those irrefutable facts ... it just confuses this collection of make-believe science hacks and nonsense babbling Bonobos. Let them have their Venusian lakes ... in fact, you should tell them that the fishing there is excellent; (a little green guy told you so) ... |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Venus has no water.
On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 5:05:11 AM UTC-7, Dean Markley wrote:
On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 1:01:20 AM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote: Sounds to me that 20 ppm H2O is kinda inert or downright passive, and that's actually a very good thing. With molecular sieves and basic water recycling being old-hat technology, who the hell needs even 20 ppm? Once again, Brad, your lack of science is showing. Acidity and corrosivity need not be dependent on water. Yes, I agree there are tiny amounts of water vapor high in the Venusian atmosphere. I also note that you eluded the question I posed you which is another of your habits when you get called out. And then there's your continuing habit of tossing in technical terms (molecular sieves) that have nothing to do with the discussion. That is called distraction and only works on your fellow ignoramuses. Those of us with normal sight have this nasty habit of interpreting what we see and from whatever we get to read. Was that too technical for those of your kind? read. BTW; why are those of your Semitic kind so unable to eliminate those blank lines and added line spacing? Obviously spooks and moles have those highly specialized computers, and do not have any format control. Your job has nothing whatsoever to do with any original science or any continued research as based upon the science of others. You can't even name a single individual or group that you've benefited with your supposed expertise. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WATER WATER WATER FOR AUSTRALIA... HOPELESSLY PRAYING MR HOWARD | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | February 11th 07 11:57 AM |
Water on Venus. | Strange Creature | Astronomy Misc | 2 | July 30th 06 07:01 PM |
Venus/Moon - to Terraform, DNA seed or Not - in spite of whatever you've been told, there's other intelligent life on Venus. Venus simply is NOT insurmountably too hot and nasty. | Matt Wiser | History | 1 | February 7th 06 07:02 AM |
Water on the moon or Mars, part-2, water on your brain, you torture for microsoft, don't you? | Matt Wiser | History | 0 | December 28th 05 08:12 AM |
Water on the moon or Mars, part-2, water on your brain, you torture for microsoft, don't you? | OM | History | 0 | December 26th 05 09:02 PM |