A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Let's play "Find the Bottom"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 24th 09, 12:06 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Jonathan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 267
Default Let's play "Find the Bottom"


Take a look at this absolutely beautiful example of a
panic sell in progress.

http://bigcharts.marke****ch.com/qui...eq=7& time=18

The transient (disturbance) clearly begins Tuesday morning
and the previous close was about $12.25. The transient
is a result of the news that this company just sold 5 million
shares to some big investor at a price of $9.75. A classic sell off
due to stock dilution. Notice how many people thought that
$9.75 was the bottom....oops...it kept on falling past the
/discounted price/ the /large investor/ was just given.
Typically large investors get a 20% or so discount for the
big buy.

So, the big question is, where will the bottom be?

Predicting the future of a real world complex dynamic system, comprised
of hundreds of investors, thousands of employees and dozens of
competitors is perhaps the hardest prediction to make of all

And this particular system is also in the midst of a panic/chaos.

How can we predict the future behavior of a complex dynamic system
whose internal working formulae are unknown? How can we predict
what most would consider a chaotic (panic) situation without any
internal detailed knowledge?

It's easy! On a 2d chart a self organizing system is denoted by a scale
independent slope of -1, with a total fall of 50%. (Why is another post)
Adjusted for real world behavior. Which in this case means a very reliable
'false bottom' a bit more than halfway down, and a total fall of some
40% as investors tend to anticipate and jump half-off gun.

A 40% drop starting at $12.25 returns a bottom of about $7.35.
But investors also like round numbers.

So I say the bottom will be $7.50.
With a quick bounce back to $8.50, which is where the transient ends.
And the system returns to it's normal behavior, whatever that is.

Give it a couple of days, and we'll see.


s















 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
might Odissey-Moon be the Google's expected, preferred, designed,"chosen" and (maybe) "funded" GLXP team to WIN the prize? with ALL otherteams that just play the "sparring partners" role? gaetanomarano Policy 3 September 27th 08 06:47 PM
just THREE YEARS AFTER my "CREWLESS Space Shuttle" article, theNSF """experts""" discover the idea of an unmanned Shuttle to fill the2010-2016 cargo-to-ISS (six+ years) GAP gaetanomarano Policy 3 September 15th 08 04:47 PM
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF "slow motion experts" have(finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... just 20 gaetanomarano Policy 9 August 30th 08 12:05 AM
1 minute play: "Relative G" [email protected] History 0 April 29th 06 12:45 AM
"The bottom line: science at NASA is disappearing — fast," jacob navia Policy 25 March 8th 06 09:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.