Evolutionists Stumped Again: Early Earth Had Oxygen Atmosphere

If you wanna believe that, then go ahead, we won't try and stop you.
Generally, it's only the fundymorons we have a problem with.

I know what you mean. The fundies are a royal pain in the grommet. I
was hoping they would read my post and be surprised at how a simple
explanation can resolve the debate instead of going ballistic with the
Bible.

I personally ALWAYS look for the uncomplicated reasons. Then I go have
a beer.

L'Chaim

Gman wrote:
If you wanna believe that, then go ahead, we won't try and stop you.
Generally, it's only the fundymorons we have a problem with.

I know what you mean. The fundies are a royal pain in the grommet. I
was hoping they would read my post and be surprised at how a simple
explanation can resolve the debate instead of going ballistic with the
Bible.

I personally ALWAYS look for the uncomplicated reasons. Then I go have
a beer.

L'Chaim

Enjoy your refreshing beverage. Prosit!

On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:58:28 -0500,
(Michael Stemper) spake thusly:


In article .com, Sphere writes:

I also don't believe in any sort of absolutes.

None whatsoever?

Do you think he's absolutely sure about that?


--

"Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34

O
/
/
[]()X()[]
\
\
O

"For the word of God is sharper than any two edged sword."

http://www.creationists.org/ervin.html

Mike Painter wrote:
wrote:
Not really, I believe I absolutely exist but know that my experience of it
is not absolutely true.

As for a plan, I've been using Skype, always free computer to computer and
free computer to phone within America and I think Canada until the end of
the year.
Usually it is a flawless connection. Occasionally a milder than cell phone
echo and once in a while a connection that is like a poor phone connection.

Kurt Goedel proved in the 1930's that there is always at least one
assumption that you have to make that you can't prove (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incompleteness_theorem).

I tried Skype, but it didn't work for me, until switched to a VoIP
provider (see my review at http://www.betterphone.org).

Thanks,

Thomas

wrote:

Kurt Goedel proved in the 1930's that there is always at least one
assumption that you have to make that you can't prove (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incompleteness_theorem).

That's a bizarre way of trying to synopsize Goedel, and also not what
the cited article says. Not that the article is much good either IMHO,
because it talks about "basic arithmetic truths" without discussing
what those might be.