|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
LeoCondo, the...
In article ,
Craig Fink wrote: Any other want-to-be LeoCondo owners out there? Yes, but I need to make a few $million first. Let me get back to you next year. What should the minimum unit be? A cubic centimeter of volume, so almost anyone could afford to participate? I would want at least enough cubic to fit my body into comfortably. Something the size of the interior of a mini-van would do. Best, - Joe -- "Polywell" fusion -- an approach to nuclear fusion that might actually work. Learn more and discuss via: http://www.strout.net/info/science/polywell/ |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
LeoMircoMarkets ( LeoCondo, the...
Joe Strout wrote:
In article , Craig Fink wrote: Any other want-to-be LeoCondo owners out there? Yes, but I need to make a few $million first. Let me get back to you next year. What should the minimum unit be? A cubic centimeter of volume, so almost anyone could afford to participate? I would want at least enough cubic to fit my body into comfortably. Something the size of the interior of a mini-van would do. Then you have to buy the rest on the Volume futures market, Futures trading, to go with your own investment. Initially, you could probably get away with arranging your transportation first, years in advance. Then buy enough volume futures for your month long vacation well in advance for the time period you want to stay. You might even want to buy some contingency time, or wait to the last minute, volume should be relatively cheap. Cheap, until all the volume for a specific time frame is used up. Then it might become quite expensive. After volume becomes expensive, you might want to buy your volume first, for your vacation, then worry about transportation. Airconditioned volume in space, a marketable asset. What to do with your cubic centimeter when volume is cheap and very few Tourist are taking vacations? Lack of transportation. Sell the first number of years on the volume futures market, maybe someone will buy it. Maybe a farmer's co-op, wants to buy a volume to grow food, to sell to the tourists. A little robot, to tend the garden, pick the produce, freeze or refrigerate it. This could develop into a food futures market. What to do with my cubic centimeter? How about a vinyard/wineary, with a little spider robot to tend the crop and make the wine, grape juice, consumer grapes for tourists. The "up" mass shouldn't be to large, volume should be relatively cheap initially. Converts CO2 to O2, uses unused power while no one is home, it would fit nicely into several other micro-LEO markets and futures markets. Might even be able to sell a bottle or two of wine here on Earth. Impress your friends at dinner, by ordering the most expensive bottle of wine at the most expensive restaurant on Earth, get SpaceWine, it's only $100,000 per bottle. Gees, we're going to need a better name that that. Anybody want to go in on a LEO wineary? And then there is risk too, if your volume pops while your property need repair, people holding the volume futures loose their investment for the time period. The LeoCondoVolumeFuturesMarket, that sure seems like a good way to get started. As soon as we get a free market system going in LEO the better. Starting off small would seem to be a good idea, a micro-Market. What's the lifetime of a Bigelow Hotel? Is it time yet? To start a micro-Market in LEO? Or, is it still to early? Really, the sooner we get something like this started, the sooner everyone with a bright idea to produce some LEO product can get started working on it. The Space rEVOLution will make the Internet revolution look small. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
LeoCondo, the...
BradGuth wrote:
On Nov 1, 9:27 am, Craig Fink wrote: ...heck with Leo HighRise. Exactly how many room are in a Bigelow Hotel? Purchase Time Share; 750 / 50 / ?30? = $500,000. for your own week, once a year.... Purchase One owner; 750 / ?30? = $25 million Yearly maintenance fee; 50/50/?30? = $33,000 per week or $1,700,000 per unit Humm, looks doable. Anybody want to go in on a LeoCondo deal? LeoCondo owners are responsible for their own transportation. -- Craig Fink Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ I think going from the ground up has certain LEO condo advantages, although I really like the idea of those POOF City condos at Venus L2. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.e...903f21bbf5eeb0 LEO HighRise Agricultural, Industrial, Office and Condos (starting at $1000/sf + 1% annual member fees) Sometimes, it's fun to dream about near term projects, not so far in the future. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
LeoCondo, the...
Joe Strout wrote:
Any other want-to-be LeoCondo owners out there? Yes, but I need to make a few $million first. *Let me get back to you next year. What a sad commentary it is about our Space Programs. Sad because if you love Space and wanted to work in the area since childhood, the only true option was to become a product yourself. Something for governments and corporations to mine, join the space technology mining revolution as a raw material. Geeks are the raw material to be used and abused in this Communist/Fascist part of the economy. Really sad, or glad depending on your perspective, that the only people who seem to be doing anything right now in Space are the Geeks who chose a different path. The ones the joined and worked in the Computer/Internet revolution. A truely free market, where Geeks are valued and allowed to keep what they have earned. They have the million$ which translates into the freedom to pursue their secondary Space Dreams. Ron Paul, has always protected the Internet, worked hard to keep it a truely "free" market, one where the participants can prosper, one where we see those participants moving on to second careers, another industry. "Net Neutrality", sounds nice doesn't it, but it's the first step to regulate what is now a "free" market. Once regulated, what follows, more regulation that will invariably favor one group over another. Regulated markets are really about protecting and growing market share of the "old" players, keeping other, new, more progressive, concepts, paths out of the market place. In favor of a path that benefits who? I'd really like to see a transition to a "free" market in LEO. Here's a few Ron Paul videos; If I can find them again, someone is messing with the search engine at Youtube, it hasn't been working quite right for the last week or so. From my perspective anyway. Very stale searches (sometimes "most recent" video are 2 or 3 days old), quite a few removed soon after they arrive (oh look a new one only 18 hours old, click, been removed). To, me, all political video material "is fair use" prior to an election. Copyright protection does not exist for election videos used by the the voter prior to election, to inform the voter about choices. To me, this is a constitutional thing, the voter's rights and the election far outweighs any and all interests of any copyright holder wrt distribution, use, redistribution, modification, ... To me, an election is so important to our form of government, our way of life, copyright does not exist, it's covered under fair use. Just my opinion on the importance of the voter, elections and balance of power built into the Constitution. Youtube was thinking about video fingerprinting for copyright protection. Seems reasonable, but it doesn't apply to elections. Again, my opinion, about the importance of Elections. Are election video getting caught up in the new video fingerprinting copyright protection filter? -- Craig Fink Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
LeoCondo, the...
Craig Fink wrote:
: :Youtube was thinking about video fingerprinting for copyright protection. :Seems reasonable, but it doesn't apply to elections. Again, my opinion, :about the importance of Elections. : You're wrong. The stuff belongs to whoever produced it. Stealing it is stealing it, regardless of how you think the theft is 'ok' because elections are important. -- "False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil." -- Socrates |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
LeoCondo, the...
On Nov 3, 3:24 am, Craig Fink wrote:
BradGuth wrote: On Nov 1, 9:27 am, Craig Fink wrote: ...heck with Leo HighRise. Exactly how many room are in a Bigelow Hotel? Purchase Time Share; 750 / 50 / ?30? = $500,000. for your own week, once a year.... Purchase One owner; 750 / ?30? = $25 million Yearly maintenance fee; 50/50/?30? = $33,000 per week or $1,700,000 per unit Humm, looks doable. Anybody want to go in on a LeoCondo deal? Leo Condo owners are responsible for their own transportation. -- Craig Fink Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ I think going from the ground up has certain LEO condo advantages, although I really like the idea of those POOF City condos at Venus L2. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.e...ad/ee903f21bbf... LEO HighRise Agricultural, Industrial, Office and Condos (starting at $1000/sf + 1% annual member fees) Sometimes, it's fun to dream about near term projects, not so far in the future. I totally 100% agree, as to why the initial LSE-CM/ISS prototype of a future depot/gateway worthy outpost of such orbiting accommodations (possibly POOF like) has been technically doable for decades (that being especially true if you believe in anything NASA/Apollo). It's also why my arguments/rants have been so focused upon Venus, because it's often so nearby and having been much more humanly doable than any other planet or moon we've got to work with, as well as there's clearly signs of intelligent other life as having been existing/coexisting on Venus (you already know that I kid you not). I am not trying to steal your topic's LEO POOF Condo thunder, as I too have been promoting a Venus L2 POOF City that I'd very much like to see happen. Unfortunately this faith-based orchestrated usenet cesspool of infowar/infomercial spewed disinformation plus naysayism and/or anti-revisionism isn't being a happy camper about much of anything, are they. - Brad Guth - |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
LeoCondo, the...
In sci.space.policy message ,
Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:33:42, dott.Piergiorgio dott.PiergiorgioNIHON@KAIGUN ..fastwebnet.it posted: I wonder, is Bigelow's Hotel is infinitely expandable? Just keep adding? I think not, because more space means also more external surface (also because of the more surface of solar panels needed for the grater energy consimption; and this will aument the atmospheric drag so will have a increased tendency to decay; the ISS tend to decay 2.5 Km. per month, so there will be a finite limit to the espandibility of the BA 330 space hotel. The decay rate of a body in a given circular orbit is essentially proportional to its cross-section divided by its mass. For a constant average density and a spherical shape, the decay rate is therefore inversely proportional to the diameter. That will at first apply, approximately, to a growing Bigelow cluster. The rate of loss of energy will be proportional to the cross-section in the direction of motion; so, if orientation along the direction of motion can be preserved, it will be economical to have orbiters which are long in comparison with their cross-section; with re-boost available, decay rate is of secondary importance. -- (c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK. Turnpike v6.05 MIME. Web URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQqish topics, acronyms & links; Astro stuff via astron-1.htm, gravity0.htm ; quotings.htm, pascal.htm, etc. No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Secrecy in Government, will be the death of Democracy ( LeoCondo, the...
Fred J. McCall wrote, after clipped to much of the related material in his
quotation: Craig Fink wrote: : :Youtube was thinking about video fingerprinting for copyright protection. :Seems reasonable, but it doesn't apply to elections. Again, my opinion, :about the importance of Elections. : You're wrong. The stuff belongs to whoever produced it. Stealing it is stealing it, regardless of how you think the theft is 'ok' because elections are important. Let just say we have a difference of opinion. It's not theft, if they don't have the rights to it. I can see where after the political person has retired, the property holder might regain some protections, maybe not. Information is so important in having an informed electorate. Right, wrong, indifferent, it's up to the people to sort it out before making their own informed decision. Voting in ignorance is a sin. Imposing ignorance on another, is also a sin. We seem to be descending towards some sort of all powerful Emperor/Monarchy system. A dictator for a day, is one day too long. Personally, this issue is so important, especially when one of the choices is related to some other elected official, like Bush and Clinton, I'm not sure that whatever precedence was used to keep presidential libraries secret is valid. The information contained in these Presidential Libraries, is just as important and necessary to have a properly informed electorate, that they should be opened to the public. The election process is so fundamental and important to way of life and form of government, I cannot see how much of anything with respect to making an informed choice in the voting booth is out of the public domain during an election. Secrecy in Government, will be the death of Democracy. JOO. -- Craig Fink Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|