A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

We forgot something



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 25th 06, 05:07 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default We forgot something

That of course being the "Most Valuable Space Newsgroup Contributor Of
The Year Award".
And we know why we forgot it also.
Because, let's face it, it's inevitably you-know-who.
Yes, the prize is now known as the Rusty Barton Award.
Although I'd like to establish the "William Mook Award" for the "Where
The Hell Did That Idea Come From?" category. This award to be delivered
via a GPS guided, laser powered, flying lunchbox that sneaks up on you
from behind due to its soundless rocket engines.
Mr. Mook, here's one to you on Christmas day.
If "thinking outside the box" is a virtue, you're not only succeeding in
doing that, you're somewhere in the middle of the next block.
"Let's Terraform The Sun" ....my God, the very _grandeur_ of the
conception. :-) :-) :-)

Pat
  #2  
Old December 25th 06, 05:36 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
kT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,032
Default We forgot something

Pat Flannery wrote:
That of course being the "Most Valuable Space Newsgroup Contributor Of
The Year Award".
And we know why we forgot it also.
Because, let's face it, it's inevitably you-know-who.
Yes, the prize is now known as the Rusty Barton Award.
Although I'd like to establish the "William Mook Award" for the "Where
The Hell Did That Idea Come From?" category. This award to be delivered
via a GPS guided, laser powered, flying lunchbox that sneaks up on you
from behind due to its soundless rocket engines.
Mr. Mook, here's one to you on Christmas day.
If "thinking outside the box" is a virtue, you're not only succeeding in
doing that, you're somewhere in the middle of the next block.
"Let's Terraform The Sun" ....my God, the very _grandeur_ of the
conception. :-) :-) :-)


The Mook rocket powered intercontinental pizza and coffee delivery
system was fairly ingenious too. That would really help us out a lot,
after the next category 5 hurricane slices through the central Bahamas.

http://cosmic.lifeform.org
  #3  
Old December 25th 06, 05:54 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Rusty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 617
Default We forgot something


Pat Flannery wrote:
That of course being the "Most Valuable Space Newsgroup Contributor Of
The Year Award".
And we know why we forgot it also.
Because, let's face it, it's inevitably you-know-who.
Yes, the prize is now known as the Rusty Barton Award.
Although I'd like to establish the "William Mook Award" for the "Where
The Hell Did That Idea Come From?" category. This award to be delivered
via a GPS guided, laser powered, flying lunchbox that sneaks up on you
from behind due to its soundless rocket engines.
Mr. Mook, here's one to you on Christmas day.
If "thinking outside the box" is a virtue, you're not only succeeding in
doing that, you're somewhere in the middle of the next block.
"Let's Terraform The Sun" ....my God, the very _grandeur_ of the
conception. :-) :-) :-)

Pat



Who could forget the Amish Nuclear Reactor? A wagon hitch on top of the
cast iron reactor vessel allowed a team of plough horses to move the
control rods. The worlds first atomic powered blacksmith shoppe.

Rusty

  #4  
Old December 25th 06, 06:37 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default We forgot something



Rusty wrote:


Who could forget the Amish Nuclear Reactor? A wagon hitch on top of the
cast iron reactor vessel allowed a team of plough horses to move the
control rods. The worlds first atomic powered blacksmith shoppe.



I always thought Heisenberg's heavy water filled cauldron reactor looked
like something that should show up in a Wagner opera, probably with Loki
singing a aria over it. :-)

Pat
  #5  
Old December 26th 06, 02:50 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Jonathan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 428
Default We forgot something


"Rusty" wrote in message
ps.com...

Pat Flannery wrote:
That of course being the "Most Valuable Space Newsgroup Contributor Of
The Year Award".
And we know why we forgot it also.
Because, let's face it, it's inevitably you-know-who.
Yes, the prize is now known as the Rusty Barton Award.
Although I'd like to establish the "William Mook Award" for the "Where
The Hell Did That Idea Come From?" category. This award to be delivered
via a GPS guided, laser powered, flying lunchbox that sneaks up on you
from behind due to its soundless rocket engines.
Mr. Mook, here's one to you on Christmas day.
If "thinking outside the box" is a virtue, you're not only succeeding in
doing that, you're somewhere in the middle of the next block.
"Let's Terraform The Sun" ....my God, the very _grandeur_ of the
conception. :-) :-) :-)

Pat



Who could forget the Amish Nuclear Reactor? A wagon hitch on top of the
cast iron reactor vessel allowed a team of plough horses to move the
control rods. The worlds first atomic powered blacksmith shoppe.





That's not far fetched...look at this Amish conspiracy
http://www.geocities.com/beaver_militia/nasa.html





Rusty


  #6  
Old December 26th 06, 09:44 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default We forgot something



Jonathan wrote:


That's not far fetched...look at this Amish conspiracy
http://www.geocities.com/beaver_militia/nasa.html





Do you have any idea the funding boost that NASA could get if it could
prove there's life on Mars?
They'd be flying probes all over the thing.
Far from trying to cover it up, they're frantically looking for any hint
of it, down to the point of immediately deciding those liquid flows in
the crater are water, and not the far more likely liquid CO2.
Because a lifeless Mars is a boring Mars, and you don't get funding to
explore boring places.

Pat
  #7  
Old December 26th 06, 09:58 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Eric Chomko
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,630
Default We forgot something


OM wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 11:07:00 -0600, Pat Flannery
wrote:

That of course being the "Most Valuable Space Newsgroup Contributor Of
The Year Award".


...The year isn't over yet, Patrick. This year, I think it's a tossup
between Rusty's PDF fetish, and Rand finally putting Chumpko in his
killfile.


Naw, you flip-flopping between brown-noser and plonker is clearly the
most legendary...


OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[


  #8  
Old December 27th 06, 03:58 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history
Jonathan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 428
Default We forgot something


"Pat Flannery" wrote in message
...


Jonathan wrote:


That's not far fetched...look at this Amish conspiracy
http://www.geocities.com/beaver_militia/nasa.html





Do you have any idea the funding boost that NASA could get if it could
prove there's life on Mars?
They'd be flying probes all over the thing.
Far from trying to cover it up, they're frantically looking for any hint
of it, down to the point of immediately deciding those liquid flows in
the crater are water, and not the far more likely liquid CO2.
Because a lifeless Mars is a boring Mars, and you don't get funding to
explore boring places.



But this is a conspiracy only scientists can pull off.
The rovers were designed to look for only evidence of
water, they cannot detect organic material.
The next lander can test for habitability, but not
evidence of biological activity.
http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/science03.php

After that the next mission can detect organics
and the building blocks of life, but yet again it
cannot test for life.
http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/miss...uture/msl.html

Then the next step, the one that could actually prove
life, would be the sample return mission. Which
would take something like seven years just to
fly the sample back to earth.
http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/miss...eMissions.html

You get the picture? They are not now, or in the near future
even looking for life, but everything else first. Why make
the big discovery now, when they can MILK it for
another twenty or thirty years. About the remaining
length of their careers....funny about that.

It's the oldest govt conspiracy there is, milk the gravy
train as long as possible. What makes this entire
gravy trail go is the mystery, the possibility.
Make the discovery now, and it will suddenly
become...been there...done that...let's move
on. As long as they can dangle the mystery and
possibility, they can continue to milk this story
for all it's worth.




s











Pat


  #9  
Old December 27th 06, 09:59 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,941
Default We forgot something

"Jonathan" wrote in message


It's the oldest govt conspiracy there is, milk the gravy
train as long as possible. What makes this entire
gravy trail go is the mystery, the possibility.
Make the discovery now, and it will suddenly
become...been there...done that...let's move
on. As long as they can dangle the mystery and
possibility, they can continue to milk this story
for all it's worth.


You do realize there's other intelligent life existing/coexisting on
Venus, don't you?

It's not even hocus-pocus or otherwise the least bit outside the regular
laws of physics.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
  #10  
Old December 27th 06, 11:06 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Wayne Throop
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,062
Default We forgot something

: "Brad Guth"
: You do realize there's other intelligent life existing/coexisting on
: Venus, don't you?

Nope. Nor do you. You imagine and perhaps believe there are.

: It's not even hocus-pocus or otherwise the least bit outside the
: regular laws of physics.

True; no problem with the laws of physics.
It merely contradticts actual observation to suppose
anything like DNA-in-water style life is there.


Wayne Throop http://sheol.org/throopw
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Forgot Starlord Amateur Astronomy 0 July 24th 06 07:41 PM
Someone forgot to use spell check Hilton Evans Amateur Astronomy 12 February 16th 04 06:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.