|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Meet The Nuclear-Powered Self-Driving Drone NASA Is Sending To A MoonOf Saturn
"On the face of it, NASA's newest probe sounds incredible. Known as Dragonfly, it
is a dual-rotor quadcopter (technically an octocopter, even more technically an X8 octocopter); it's roughly the size of a compact car; it's completely autonomous; it's nuclear powered; and it will hover above the surface of Saturn's moon Titan. But Elizabeth Turtle, the mission's principle investigator at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, insists that this is actually a pretty tame space probe, as these things go. "There's not a lot of new technology," she says. Quadcopters (even X8 octocopters) are for sale on Amazon these days. Self-driving technology is coming along quickly. Nuclear power is harder to come by, but the team plans to use the same kind of system that runs NASA's Curiosity rover on Mars. Everything that's going into Dragonfly is already being used somewhere else. Which is not to say that the idea of a nuclear-powered drone flying around a moon of Saturn doesn't sound kind of crazy." See: https://www.npr.org/2019/09/17/76064...moon-of-saturn |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Meet The Nuclear-Powered Self-Driving Drone NASA Is Sending ToA Moon Of Saturn
Which moon? Titan?
Which is not to say that the idea of a nuclear-powered drone flying around a moon of Saturn doesn't sound kind of crazy." Then after it's life, it crash lands on the moon? So if there's life there, the next time we look, it will be different? "On the face of it, NASA's newest probe sounds incredible. Known as Dragonfly, it is a dual-rotor quadcopter (technically an octocopter, even more technically an X8 octocopter); it's roughly the size of a compact car; it's completely autonomous; it's nuclear powered; and it will hover above the surface of Saturn's moon Titan. But Elizabeth Turtle, the mission's principle investigator at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, insists that this is actually a pretty tame space probe, as these things go. "There's not a lot of new technology," she says. Quadcopters (even X8 octocopters) are for sale on Amazon these days. Self-driving technology is coming along quickly. Nuclear power is harder to come by, but the team plans to use the same kind of system that runs NASA's Curiosity rover on Mars. Everything that's going into Dragonfly is already being used somewhere else. See: https://www.npr.org/2019/09/17/76064...moon-of-saturn |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Meet The Nuclear-Powered Self-Driving Drone NASA Is Sending To AMoon Of Saturn
On Tuesday, September 17, 2019 at 1:33:22 PM UTC-4, wrote:
"On the face of it, NASA's newest probe sounds incredible. Known as Dragonfly, it is a dual-rotor quadcopter (technically an octocopter, even more technically an X8 octocopter); it's roughly the size of a compact car; it's completely autonomous; it's nuclear powered; and it will hover above the surface of Saturn's moon Titan. But Elizabeth Turtle, the mission's principle investigator at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, insists that this is actually a pretty tame space probe, as these things go. "There's not a lot of new technology," she says. Quadcopters (even X8 octocopters) are for sale on Amazon these days. Self-driving technology is coming along quickly. Nuclear power is harder to come by, but the team plans to use the same kind of system that runs NASA's Curiosity rover on Mars. Everything that's going into Dragonfly is already being used somewhere else. Which is not to say that the idea of a nuclear-powered drone flying around a moon of Saturn doesn't sound kind of crazy." See: https://www.npr.org/2019/09/17/76064...moon-of-saturn I saw an article that said that the atmospheric density at the surface is 2 times that of Earth, the gravity is 1/3 that of Earth, and that a human could devise wings and be able to fly like a bird. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Meet The Nuclear-Powered Self-Driving Drone NASA Is Sending To AMoon Of Saturn
On 2019-09-17 1:33 PM, wrote:
Which is not to say that the idea of a nuclear-powered drone flying around a moon of Saturn doesn't sound kind of crazy." See: https://www.npr.org/2019/09/17/76064...moon-of-saturn This is pretty tame nuclear technology. A low power RTG. A quick websearch (DuckDuckGo don't be evil) to Wikipedia yields three links: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragonfly_(spacecraft) http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~rlorenz/jbis.pdf https://dragonfly.jhuapl.edu/News-an..._03-Lorenz.pdf From the third link see section titled Power 2.1 (pgs 223-224). The two main points: 1) Titan is Very Cold (you will need ample energy to heat the probe) 2) Titan is Very Dark (no solar cells) What is interesting is the analysis of why not just bring O2 to combust with the abundant methane already in Titan's atmosphere? The problem is the ambient temperature. Combustion products emitted by an APU like combuster would freeze quickly and could potentially block an exhaust port. Monoprop hydrazine has a similar issue. Also the fact that you need two molecules of oxygen to burn one of methane and thus only 50% better than bringing both fuel and oxidizer from Earth. Thus a big oxygen tank is needed, brought all the way from Earth. The second link to the most recent paper proposes an Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermal Electric Generator to recharge an on-board battery pack with efficiencies similar to the batteries used in a Tesla. Thus I presume we are talking some type of Lithium-Ion. I'm assuming they are using a hybrid RTG/Li-Ion battery power system in order to supply the higher electric energy demand needed to power the quad-copter motors. I believe this is the weakest link in the proposed design because the batteries do add a lot of mass to the probe. Both the 2018 and 1999 papers leave the exact RTG technology to be used also somewhat undefined. IMO I think they need to nail the energy budget first to come up with the requirements needed of a workable power unit and stop writing about up-and-coming power technology. Go with what you can have in hand now or don't commit to a launch date. I assume the crash scenario would only be for an unintended loss of control, not because you fly it when power is no longer nominal for flight. I suspect the RTGs are heavy duty enough likely to survive a fall in Titan's very low gravity. I doubt the shielding of the device would even be breached. So effectively, what would happen to any potential life on Titan should the probe crash? Nothing. The link to the third paper is quite old (1999). For the purposes of discussion I challenge other readers to due some research and update the information I have provided to something more recent. (Gosh! You mean to actually do some RESEARCH before commenting here?). Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Meet The Nuclear-Powered Self-Driving Drone NASA Is Sending To AMoon Of Saturn
References to papers and links got scrambled.
The second link is the older paper 1999. The third link is the most recent paper 2018. I thought I had fixed those! Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Meet The Nuclear-Powered Self-Driving Drone NASA Is Sending To AMoon Of Saturn
On 2019-09-18 9:19 AM, Scott Kozel wrote:
I saw an article that said that the atmospheric density at the surface is 2 times that of Earth, the gravity is 1/3 that of Earth, and that a human could devise wings and be able to fly like a bird. The project team's most recent paper says atmospheric density is 4x Earth at Sea Level, viscosity is 3x smaller than Earth (be careful of propeller speed) and gravity is 1/7 of Earth's. "Daytime" surface illumination is 1000x less than Earth or 1000x full moonlight predominately in red and near IR light, thus a human explorer would get a largely dim B&W experience w/o a headlight. See Table 1: https://dragonfly.jhuapl.edu/News-an..._03-Lorenz.pdf Dave |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Meet The Nuclear-Powered Self-Driving Drone NASA Is Sending To AMoon Of Saturn
On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 11:24:55 AM UTC-4, David Spain wrote:
On 2019-09-18 9:19 AM, Scott Kozel wrote: I saw an article that said that the atmospheric density at the surface is 2 times that of Earth, the gravity is 1/3 that of Earth, and that a human could devise wings and be able to fly like a bird. The project team's most recent paper says atmospheric density is 4x Earth at Sea Level, viscosity is 3x smaller than Earth (be careful of propeller speed) and gravity is 1/7 of Earth's. Getting down toward the temperature of LOX, so a human would have a hard time surviving there! "Daytime" surface illumination is 1000x less than Earth or 1000x full moonlight predominately in red and near IR light, thus a human explorer would get a largely dim B&W experience w/o a headlight. The surface photos from Huygens seemed brighter and more colorful than that. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Meet The Nuclear-Powered Self-Driving Drone NASA Is Sending To AMoon Of Saturn
On 2019-09-18 11:40 PM, Scott Kozel wrote:
On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 11:24:55 AM UTC-4, David Spain wrote: "Daytime" surface illumination is 1000x less than Earth or 1000x full moonlight predominately in red and near IR light, thus a human explorer would get a largely dim B&W experience w/o a headlight. The surface photos from Huygens seemed brighter and more colorful than that. I suspect those photos were post processed a bit to bring out contrast. In full moonlight is IS barely possible to make out color. So it might be possible that 1000x moonlight would show some color but with the visible spectrum largely in the color red, I suspect your eye's rods rather than cones would be doing most of the heavy lifting and colors will look false (like green as grey and yellow maybe as white, etc) until your headlight hits them. Most definitely one's suit will need ample heating. Maybe it too contains a portable atomic reactor! Dave |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Meet The Nuclear-Powered Self-Driving Drone NASA Is Sending To AMoon Of Saturn
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
39 days to Mars possible now with nuclear-powered VASIMR. | Thomas Koenig | Astronomy Misc | 4 | November 8th 15 02:36 PM |
Russian nuclear-powered SSTO vehicle | Pat Flannery | History | 9 | February 27th 11 10:21 PM |
So sending people in space craft with ion thrusters or nuclear propulsionto Mars has side effect? | kelvin | Space Shuttle | 5 | November 17th 05 02:23 AM |
Nuclear powered airliners | Robert Lynn | Policy | 54 | October 18th 05 12:21 AM |
What we need is a nuclear powered moon rover | bob haller | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 4th 04 09:20 PM |