A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Comet impact!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 4th 05, 09:07 PM
Stan Dornfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Comet impact!

Anyone know why the impactor was made from copper?

Regards,

Stan-


  #2  
Old July 4th 05, 09:24 PM
StableXYZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Its cheap?

Or perhaps the aliens cant get tractor beams locked on to things made
of pure copper.

  #3  
Old July 4th 05, 10:39 PM
OG
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stan Dornfeld" wrote in message
...
Anyone know why the impactor was made from copper?


A very proud atricle on www.copper.org *

includes the following . . .
Why is this unique spacecraft made of copper? Because when copper
burns-which it will from the enormous force of the impact-it is less likely
than other metals to create bright, confusing emission lines in the spectrum
of interest, according to Prof. Michael A'Hearn, Department of Astronomy,
University of Maryland in College Park. He's one of the astronomers who
proposed Deep Impact.

The professor adds that aluminum, for instance, is not suitable for the
experiment because it would react with the water in the comet, creating
aluminum oxide, and produce very bright emissions that could distort the
data

http://www.copper.org/resources/cuto...pacecraft.html




*"we really like copper", "brass is almost as good"


  #4  
Old July 5th 05, 12:41 AM
Double-A
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Stan Dornfeld wrote:
Anyone know why the impactor was made from copper?

Regards,

Stan-



"The impactor is made primarily of copper (49%) as opposed to aluminum
(24%) because it minimizes corruption of spectral emission lines that
are used to analyze the nucleus."

http://deepimpact.jpl.nasa.gov/tech/impactor.html

Double-A

  #5  
Old July 5th 05, 06:48 AM
Greysky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Double-A" wrote in message
oups.com...


Stan Dornfeld wrote:
Anyone know why the impactor was made from copper?

Regards,

Stan-



"The impactor is made primarily of copper (49%) as opposed to aluminum
(24%) because it minimizes corruption of spectral emission lines that
are used to analyze the nucleus."

http://deepimpact.jpl.nasa.gov/tech/impactor.html


Another reason, though not stated in the official information source but is
major in the minds of the scientists who made the spacecraft, is "A space
probe made of bright gleaming copper is 'hecka - cool' and the scientists
could bring their girl friends over to see it late at night and thus finally
have a chance of getting laid."

Greysky


  #6  
Old July 5th 05, 07:46 AM
Odysseus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stan Dornfeld wrote:

Anyone know why the impactor was made from copper?


One reason, as OG mentioned, is that the radiation from excited
copper atoms falls in different parts of the spectrum from those of
the chemical species the investigators are most interested in, so
those signals won't be 'stepped on' by the impactor's contribution to
the explosion. Another is that they don't expect there to be an
appreciable amount of metallic minerals in the comet to begin with,
so by subtracting the known 'signature' of copper from their
observations of the impact debris they can obtain a clean profile for
the cometary material alone.

--
Odysseus
  #7  
Old July 5th 05, 08:17 AM
Double-A
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Greysky wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message
oups.com...


Stan Dornfeld wrote:
Anyone know why the impactor was made from copper?

Regards,

Stan-



"The impactor is made primarily of copper (49%) as opposed to aluminum
(24%) because it minimizes corruption of spectral emission lines that
are used to analyze the nucleus."

http://deepimpact.jpl.nasa.gov/tech/impactor.html


Another reason, though not stated in the official information source but is
major in the minds of the scientists who made the spacecraft, is "A space
probe made of bright gleaming copper is 'hecka - cool' and the scientists
could bring their girl friends over to see it late at night and thus finally
have a chance of getting laid."

Greysky



Those science nerd dudes will do what they hafta to do!

Double-A

  #8  
Old July 5th 05, 11:36 AM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Stan I would think that the comet would have no cooper in its
structure. That means when the hot debris is analyzed the cooper part of
the spectrum can be ruled out. Gold would have been good. silver would
have been OK Cooper is cheaper Bert

  #9  
Old July 5th 05, 11:45 AM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

Double-A wrote:

Greysky wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message
oups.com...


Stan Dornfeld wrote:
Anyone know why the impactor was made from copper?

Regards,

Stan-


"The impactor is made primarily of copper (49%) as opposed to aluminum
(24%) because it minimizes corruption of spectral emission lines that
are used to analyze the nucleus."

http://deepimpact.jpl.nasa.gov/tech/impactor.html


Another reason, though not stated in the official information source but is
major in the minds of the scientists who made the spacecraft, is "A space
probe made of bright gleaming copper is 'hecka - cool' and the scientists
could bring their girl friends over to see it late at night and thus finally
have a chance of getting laid."

Greysky


Those science nerd dudes will do what they hafta to do!

Double-A


nightbat

Yes, leave it to scientists and researchers always wanting to
penetrate what they can.

carry on,
the nightbat
  #10  
Old July 5th 05, 12:37 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi You All What if bringing man made stuff from Earth into the solar
system contaminates this very pure system?. Just like we have all that
man made garbage in orbit around the Earth. Can I carry this thought
right up to impact,and the explosion. Did not the camera finally hit?
This would be all man made debris,and that's the stuff I'm relating my
thoughts on. I would like to see only very close up pictures shown. I
would like to see only a small chip and some surface dust taken and
brought back to Earth and be analyzed.. Best to keep in mind its best
to do things in a nice gentle way,so as not to upset mother nature. Bert

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space Calendar - June 24, 2005 [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 June 24th 05 05:11 PM
Space Calendar - June 24, 2005 [email protected] History 0 June 24th 05 05:11 PM
Space Calendar - August 27, 2004 Ron Misc 14 August 30th 04 11:09 PM
Space Calendar - August 27, 2004 OzPirate Policy 0 August 27th 04 10:11 PM
Space Calendar - July 28, 2004 Ron Astronomy Misc 0 July 28th 04 05:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.