A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Testing one stromatolite data from China with my linear extrapolationof Pannella's fossil points



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 14th 09, 09:38 AM posted to sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.math
mathematician
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 150
Default Testing one stromatolite data from China with my linear extrapolationof Pannella's fossil points

Hi,

I noticed one publication about ancient time data from China:

QU Yuangao, XIE Guwei and GONG Yiming, 2004.
Relationship between Earth-Sun-Moon 1000 Ma ago:
Evidence from the stromatolites.
Chinese Science Bulletin, 2004, Vol. 49, No. 21, 2288-2295.


Writers result which they counted from the stromatolite was:

1000 Ma:
------------

516 +- 20 days/year,

40 days/month (38.5 - 40 days/month in the paper mentioned also),

24* 365.25 / (516 +-20) = 16.99 +-0.66 hours/day

(516 +-20) / 40 = 12.9 +-0.5 months/year

(516 +-20) / 38.5 = 13.4 +-0.5 (this was not mentioned in the text).

My linear extrapolation figures of Pannella's fossil data would give:

1000 Ma:
------------

about 455 days/year,

about 33.6 days/month,

about 19.4 hours/day, ( about 24* 365.2422 / 455 = about 19.3),

about 455 / 33.6 = about 13.5 months/year,

One possible conclusion about writers data:

The stromatolites used in the above reference are not
suitable for ancient time counting, if age determination is
correct and accurate enough ???

When I investigated stromatolites for ancient time counting
I found only few reliable stromatolites for such purposes:

The Gunflint Formation stromatolite YPM-IP-28511/28510
exact age of which was 1878.3 +-1.3 Ma.
Mode= 18 - 36, Highest Count= 39.

36 - 39 mean solar days per tropical year.

Fortnights per tropical year= 28 ( which means
14 synodic months per tropical year).

From these: 504 - 546 mean solar days per tropical year.

and

The Bulawayan stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 (= P.P.R.G. 253)
age of which was little uncertain due it is not certain that
does it belong to the Upper Bulawayan Group (age about 2700 Ma)
or to the Lower Bulawayan Group (roughly age 2800 Ma-2900 Ma)
or to the Middle Bulawayan Group. (Please take a look my earlier
writing about their ages due I put those figures from my memory).

Mode=10-20-40, Highest Count=41. No other data available.

40-41 mean solar days / tropical year.



Best Regards,

Hannu Poropudas

Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki
email: hanporop at luukku.com



  #2  
Old March 14th 09, 09:49 AM posted to sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.math
mathematician
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 150
Default Testing one stromatolite data from China with my linearextrapolation of Pannella's fossil points

On Mar 14, 11:38*am, mathematician wrote:
Hi,

I noticed one publication about ancient time data from China:

QU Yuangao, XIE Guwei and GONG Yiming, 2004.
Relationship between Earth-Sun-Moon 1000 Ma ago:
Evidence from the stromatolites.
Chinese Science Bulletin, 2004, Vol. 49, No. 21, 2288-2295.

Writers result which they counted from the stromatolite was:

1000 Ma:
------------

516 +- 20 days/year,

40 days/month (38.5 - 40 days/month in the paper mentioned also),

24* 365.25 / (516 +-20) = 16.99 +-0.66 hours/day

(516 +-20) / 40 = 12.9 +-0.5 months/year

(516 +-20) / 38.5 = 13.4 +-0.5 (this was not mentioned in the text).

My linear extrapolation figures of Pannella's fossil data would give:

1000 Ma:
------------

about 455 days/year,

about 33.6 days/month,

about 19.4 hours/day, ( about 24* 365.2422 / 455 = about 19.3),

about 455 / 33.6 = about 13.5 months/year,

One possible conclusion about writers data:

The stromatolites used in the above reference are not
suitable for ancient time counting, if age determination is
correct and accurate enough ???

When I investigated stromatolites for ancient time counting
I found only few reliable stromatolites for such purposes:

The Gunflint Formation stromatolite YPM-IP-28511/28510
exact age of which was 1878.3 +-1.3 Ma.
Mode= 18 - 36, Highest Count= 39.

36 - 39 mean solar days per tropical year.

Fortnights per tropical year= 28 ( which means
14 synodic months per tropical year).

From these: 504 - 546 mean solar days per tropical year.

and

The Bulawayan stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 (= P.P.R.G. 253)
age of which was little uncertain due it is not certain that
does it belong to the Upper Bulawayan Group (age about 2700 Ma)
or to the Lower Bulawayan Group (roughly age 2800 Ma-2900 Ma)
or to the Middle Bulawayan Group. (Please take a look my earlier
writing about their ages due I put those figures from my memory).

Mode=10-20-40, Highest Count=41. No other data available.

40-41 mean solar days / tropical year.

Best Regards,

Hannu Poropudas

Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki
email: hanporop at luukku.com


Correcting couple writing errors:

36 - 39 mean solar days per tropical year.


This should be

36-39 mean solar days per synodic month.

40-41 mean solar days / tropical year.


This should be

40 - 41 mean solar days per synodic month.

Hannu
  #3  
Old March 26th 09, 05:32 AM posted to sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.math
mathematician
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 150
Default Testing one stromatolite data from China with my linearextrapolation of Pannella's fossil points

On Mar 14, 11:49*am, mathematician wrote:
On Mar 14, 11:38*am, mathematician wrote:





Hi,


I noticed one publication about ancient time data from China:


QU Yuangao, XIE Guwei and GONG Yiming, 2004.
Relationship between Earth-Sun-Moon 1000 Ma ago:
Evidence from the stromatolites.
Chinese Science Bulletin, 2004, Vol. 49, No. 21, 2288-2295.


Writers result which they counted from the stromatolite was:


1000 Ma:
------------


516 +- 20 days/year,


40 days/month (38.5 - 40 days/month in the paper mentioned also),


24* 365.25 / (516 +-20) = 16.99 +-0.66 hours/day


(516 +-20) / 40 = 12.9 +-0.5 months/year


(516 +-20) / 38.5 = 13.4 +-0.5 (this was not mentioned in the text).


My linear extrapolation figures of Pannella's fossil data would give:


1000 Ma:
------------


about 455 days/year,


about 33.6 days/month,


about 19.4 hours/day, ( about 24* 365.2422 / 455 = about 19.3),


about 455 / 33.6 = about 13.5 months/year,


One possible conclusion about writers data:


The stromatolites used in the above reference are not
suitable for ancient time counting, if age determination is
correct and accurate enough ???


When I investigated stromatolites for ancient time counting
I found only few reliable stromatolites for such purposes:


The Gunflint Formation stromatolite YPM-IP-28511/28510
exact age of which was 1878.3 +-1.3 Ma.
Mode= 18 - 36, Highest Count= 39.


36 - 39 mean solar days per tropical year.


Fortnights per tropical year= 28 ( which means
14 synodic months per tropical year).


From these: 504 - 546 mean solar days per tropical year.


and


The Bulawayan stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 (= P.P.R.G. 253)
age of which was little uncertain due it is not certain that
does it belong to the Upper Bulawayan Group (age about 2700 Ma)
or to the Lower Bulawayan Group (roughly age 2800 Ma-2900 Ma)
or to the Middle Bulawayan Group. (Please take a look my earlier
writing about their ages due I put those figures from my memory).


Mode=10-20-40, Highest Count=41. No other data available.


40-41 mean solar days / tropical year.


Best Regards,


Hannu Poropudas


Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki
email: hanporop at luukku.com


Correcting couple writing errors:

36 - 39 mean solar days per tropical year.


This should be

36-39 mean solar days per synodic month.

40-41 mean solar days / tropical year.


This should be

40 - 41 mean solar days per synodic month.

Hannu- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I found those age estimates of the Upper and Lower Bulawayan Groups
which I mentioned my previous article (about age of the Bulawayan
Stromatolite.
UCLA-Bul-7= P.P.R.G.253 in JW Schop's collection).

(These are not LOCAL age determinations from the Huntsmann Quarries
in the Bubi Greenstone Belt whrere the stomatolite was found by
Dr. Kvenvolden)


Age of the Upper Bulawayan Group:

Younger or equal than 2715 +-15 Ma, ZIM-74, Iron Mask Formation.

Older or equal than 2672 +-12 Ma, ZIM-29, "Black Cat Porphyry"
in Harare-Shamva greenstone sequence.

Age of the Lower Bulawayan Group:

Younger or equal than 2904 +-9 Ma, ZIM-92/24, Hokonui Formation.

Older or equal than 2831 +-6 Ma, ZIM-92/32, Koodoovale Formation.

Best Regards,

Hannu Poropudas

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella'sfossil time data mathematician Astronomy Misc 1 January 21st 09 06:19 AM
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes mathematician Astronomy Misc 1 January 19th 09 06:03 AM
About age of the Bulawayan stromatolite Bul-7 (= P.P.R.G. 253 J.W. Scopf’s collection number) mathematician Astronomy Misc 4 September 12th 08 03:55 PM
APPROXIMATE ANCIENT TIME FORMULA BASED ON FOSSIL DATA (One Error Correction) Hannu K.J. Poropudas Astronomy Misc 2 November 23rd 04 11:16 AM
Age of the Huntsman Limesone (Bulawayan) Stromatolite (UCLA-Bul-7 = P.P.R.G. 253) ? Hannu K.J. Poropudas Astronomy Misc 1 November 15th 04 03:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.