|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#361
|
|||
|
|||
JFK's greatest achievements/Apollo (Was: Deep Apologies to everyone....)
"Jeffrey Hamilton" wrote:
:Pat Flannery wrote: : : What made it all possible was the British invention of the Cavity : Magnetron Tube, which made it possible to build radars that used very : short wavelengths, and therefore had far better resolution than the : ones that came before. The Brits were hardly the only ones to do this. Both Americans and Germans were also involved. I'd be inclined to say that the Americans got there first (Dr. A.W. Hull). : :It went into some detail and spoke of the "Cavity :Magnetron Tube" etc. I'm no expert now but I have a slightly better idea :asto how they developed the various systems for their particular needs. :Pretty fascinating stuff. : I'm always surprised when people don't know this stuff. -- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong." -- Thomas Jefferson |
#362
|
|||
|
|||
JFK's greatest achievements/Apollo (Was: Deep Apologies to everyone....)
Alan Jones wrote: Toward the end of WW II we also developed a radar guided missile, the Lark, to counter komikazee attacks. It worked well enough in the lab, but in the vibration environment of the missile in flight the radar guidance range was reduced too much to be effective. And of course the procimity fuse was a major advance. Britain also worked on a anti-kamikaze missile during the war, called the Stooge: http://www.skomer.u-net.com/projects/stooge.htm Pat Alan |
#363
|
|||
|
|||
JFK's greatest achievements/Apollo (Was: Deep Apologies to everyone....)
Jeffrey Hamilton wrote: Lol, I'll remember that for future reference. Every boy needs at least one good magnet and I do have an old HD with a few bad sectors, Ill trash it and give the magnets to my grandson, when he is a litle older. What's a Magnetron Tube good for ? If I save one for my grandson, is he likely to nuke the house ? g Interesting historical relic. It's also interesting to see that all those microwaves that heat the food up come out of a hole that is around 3 mm in diameter. Regarding the hard drive magnets: 1. See if you can get them free from the mountings without heating them up much; they completely demagnetize if they are heated very much. A lot of times they are glued down, and you can insert a thin knife blade between the magnet and the mounting and pry it free. 2. Do not get your fingers between the magnets, as they will clamp together so hard that you will get severely pinched. 3. Keep them far away from any cathode ray tubes or magnetic memory storage units, as despite their small size they are like the magnetic equivalent of a black hole as far as power goes... how they get them to be in that close of proximity to the hard drive platters and not completely erase them is beyond me. Pat |
#364
|
|||
|
|||
JFK's greatest achievements/Apollo (Was: Deep Apologies to everyone....)
Pat Flannery wrote:
Jeffrey Hamilton wrote: This is to both posters, I never actually realized _our_ radar had developed that fast ! From those very large early sites used during the Battle of Britain, to the relatively smaller naval sets being used to destroy the Japanese shipping is a pretty steep learning curve. Radar, like jet engines, was one of those things that all the major powers developed at about the same time. Everybody had something that they thought was better than anyone else's, and everybody was keeping it a Deep Secret. What made it all possible was the British invention of the Cavity Magnetron Tube, which made it possible to build radars that used very short wavelengths, and therefore had far better resolution than the ones that came before. Actually not, although the Magnetron was important, The U.S. had the Klystron as a Microwave source and amplifier, and U.S. Receiver technology was far superior. The results produced by the Allies were do to an interesting combination of intense competition combined with cooperation. The Germans didn't have that - after all, they were _Germans_ and nobody could equal them... blah, blah, yadda, yadda. The concepts of how to apply these systems had all been pretty much worked out, setting up a blueprint that's still followed today. The fascinating part is when radar was combined with American control technology and systems integration - this resulted in auto-tracking radars that would keep themselves pointed at a particular target and stream information to fire control computers, (Analog at the time, but better than everything at determining a continuous solution) and Remote Power Control of the guns. By late 1943, all U.S. Heavy AAA, and all Naval guns with a caliber of more than 20mm on anything larger than a Sub Chaser were remotely controlled by the fire control directors, with the gun crews acting as manual backup. A cavity magnetron tube still forms the heart of all microwave ovens: http://www.gallawa.com/microtech/magnetron.html ...and when Britain thought it was in danger of invasion early in WW II they sent one to the US...sealed in a mysterious black box...that's where the term "Black Box" first came from. Actually not - The Brits carrying the experimental Magnetron to the U.S. also carried what was hoped to be full documentation - for the first day or so, until they were called onto the carpet to explain why the X-Rays of the device that they'd carried over didn't match the drawings. The traveling Boffins didn't know, and didn't know if the differences (like the number of cavities) were significant. But, within about a week or so, we'd determined the operating principles, and that the differences weren't significant. -- Pete Stickney The better the Four Wheel Drive, the further out you get stuck. |
#365
|
|||
|
|||
JFK's greatest achievements/Apollo (Was: Deep Apologies to everyone....)
Jeffrey Hamilton wrote:
One more question if you have a bit of time, what does the 45 or 50 figure mean in these instances 16"/50 or 16"/45. I do see that it refers to a 50-caliber barrel, but a 45 or 50 caliber is usually refering to a small arms or a machine gun etc. I've never understood what that signifies. cheers....Jeff The caliber of a naval gun refers to the ratio of the length of the barrel vs the size of the bore. 16"/50 means the length of the barrel is 50 time the diameter of the bore or 16" X 50 = 800" or 66.67'. 16"/45 only has barrel that is 60' long. Jay |
#366
|
|||
|
|||
JFK's greatest achievements/Apollo (Was: Deep Apologies to everyone....)
Pat Flannery wrote:
Regarding the hard drive magnets: 3. Keep them far away from any cathode ray tubes or magnetic memory storage units, as despite their small size they are like the magnetic equivalent of a black hole as far as power goes... how they get them to be in that close of proximity to the hard drive platters and not completely erase them is beyond me. For sure keep them away, well away, from magnetic media (like your floppy disk collection) and CRTs of all sorts. I spent about 5 years making disk drives for HP. This was 'back in the day' where our main seller was a 350MB drive that was 5-1/4 inch form factor, full-height, and weighed about 7 pounds. This was not a home user drive, they were designed to be used in arrays for commercial or industrial users. I still have some of the mag-motor magnets. They are crazy strong--if you get careless and let them touch with smoe part of you in between they will pinch a piece of your skin off, and if they really slap they will shatter into glass-sharp fragments that can cut the hell out of you (the rare earth material is a ceramic). I used to use them for elementary school "mad scientist" visits. Singly, they could deflect a compass needle from more than thirty feet away. But as a pair (they came with a 3/16" plastic block which went between the halves to make it much easier to separate them for installation) you had to get much closer to the compass before the needle would move. As long as the fields are contained in this way their ability to damage your drive is reduced. And, the mag-motor is mounted in the plane of the disk pack. The magnetic fields are tightly contained between the two halves (well, to be fussy some of the field is still present laterally, i.e. in the area of the disks, but very much weaker than between the halves. And, it is harder to damage a drive magnetically than you'd think (the write heads are quite strong and closely focused). The real risk we used to face was magnetic contamination-- periodically someone would get careless and break a magnet, and we had to scrap any media which was exposed at the time--tiny bits of the broken magnet would get on the disk surface and create little dead spots (not to mention the physical contamination problems, which would caus head crashes). Jeff -- Dying with an empty inbox is NOT the goal! |
#367
|
|||
|
|||
JFK's greatest achievements/Apollo (Was: Deep Apologies to everyone....)
Pat Flannery wrote:
Jeffrey Hamilton wrote: Lol, I'll remember that for future reference. Every boy needs at least one good magnet and I do have an old HD with a few bad sectors, Ill trash it and give the magnets to my grandson, when he is a litle older. What's a Magnetron Tube good for ? If I save one for my grandson, is he likely to nuke the house ? g Interesting historical relic. It's also interesting to see that all those microwaves that heat the food up come out of a hole that is around 3 mm in diameter. Regarding the hard drive magnets: 1. See if you can get them free from the mountings without heating them up much; they completely demagnetize if they are heated very much. A lot of times they are glued down, and you can insert a thin knife blade between the magnet and the mounting and pry it free. 2. Do not get your fingers between the magnets, as they will clamp together so hard that you will get severely pinched. 3. Keep them far away from any cathode ray tubes or magnetic memory storage units, as despite their small size they are like the magnetic equivalent of a black hole as far as power goes... how they get them to be in that close of proximity to the hard drive platters and not completely erase them is beyond me. Pat Good heads-up Pat, on second thought perhaps I won't give my grandson any magnet, quite _that_ powerful. cheers....Jeff |
#368
|
|||
|
|||
JFK's greatest achievements/Apollo (Was: Deep Apologies to everyone....)
jay walsh wrote:
Jeffrey Hamilton wrote: One more question if you have a bit of time, what does the 45 or 50 figure mean in these instances 16"/50 or 16"/45. I do see that it refers to a 50-caliber barrel, but a 45 or 50 caliber is usually refering to a small arms or a machine gun etc. I've never understood what that signifies. cheers....Jeff The caliber of a naval gun refers to the ratio of the length of the barrel vs the size of the bore. 16"/50 means the length of the barrel is 50 time the diameter of the bore or 16" X 50 = 800" or 66.67'. 16"/45 only has barrel that is 60' long. Jay Thankyou Jay. cheers....Jeff |
#369
|
|||
|
|||
JFK's greatest achievements/Apollo (Was: Deep Apologies to everyone....)
Jeff Crowell wrote: Pat Flannery wrote: Regarding the hard drive magnets: 3. Keep them far away from any cathode ray tubes or magnetic memory storage units, as despite their small size they are like the magnetic equivalent of a black hole as far as power goes... how they get them to be in that close of proximity to the hard drive platters and not completely erase them is beyond me. For sure keep them away, well away, from magnetic media (like your floppy disk collection) and CRTs of all sorts. I spent about 5 years making disk drives for HP. This was 'back in the day' where our main seller was a 350MB drive that was 5-1/4 inch form factor, full-height, and weighed about 7 pounds. This was not a home user drive, they were designed to be used in arrays for commercial or industrial users. I still have some of the mag-motor magnets. They are crazy strong--if you get careless and let them touch with smoe part of you in between they will pinch a piece of your skin off, Yes, I found that out. ;-) Might as well put your finger into a crab's claw. and if they really slap they will shatter into glass-sharp fragments that can cut the hell out of you (the rare earth material is a ceramic). I note that all of them seem to be plated with a fairly thick metal covering (nickel?) Is that for corrosion resistance, or to prevent any chipping of the ceramic magnet? The real risk we used to face was magnetic contamination-- periodically someone would get careless and break a magnet, and we had to scrap any media which was exposed at the time--tiny bits of the broken magnet would get on the disk surface and create little dead spots (not to mention the physical contamination problems, which would caus head crashes). What exactly are the discs made out of? They appear to be some fairly low melting point metal with a plating on it. Pat |
#370
|
|||
|
|||
JFK's greatest achievements/Apollo (Was: Deep Apologies to everyone....)
Jeff Crowell wrote:
and if they really slap they will shatter into glass-sharp fragments that can cut the hell out of you (the rare earth material is a ceramic). Pat Flannery wrote: I note that all of them seem to be plated with a fairly thick metal covering (nickel?) Is that for corrosion resistance, or to prevent any chipping of the ceramic magnet? It's nickel. It's partly for corrosion resistance, but also to minimize contamination. The real risk we used to face was magnetic contamination-- periodically someone would get careless and break a magnet, and we had to scrap any media which was exposed at the time--tiny bits of the broken magnet would get on the disk surface and create little dead spots (not to mention the physical contamination problems, which would cause head crashes). What exactly are the discs made out of? They appear to be some fairly low melting point metal with a plating on it. Aluminum, in our case (has to be non-ferrous!). We also made some glass platters for our smaller-diameter drives. I'd suspect most, if not, all modern platters are aluminum. They are plated with an iron-containing matrix (then coated with a lubricating liquid). I don't know the magnetic media's exact composition, that wasn't my thang at the time (or since, for that matter). [Obsmn/sph: HP's "Nighthawk" 3-1/2 inch hard drives were used in Tomahawk missiles]. May still be, I dunno. Jeff -- To a procrastinator, a lie is just the truth waiting to happen. C. J. Schoenrock |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Women's achievements | Dr J R Stockton[_1_] | History | 6 | July 30th 09 10:17 AM |
Bush: Greatest World Leader & Greatest President In History? ` ` | Anonymous[_12_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | March 18th 08 09:18 PM |
Bush: Greatest World Leader & Greatest President In History? ` ` | Anonymous[_12_] | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | March 18th 08 09:18 PM |
Greatest Brilliancy ==> Greatest Illuminated Extent | Paul Schlyter | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | September 18th 05 06:57 PM |
NASA Recognizes Achievements at Honor Awards Ceremony | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | August 13th 05 12:10 PM |