A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fatal Truth in Fundamental Physics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 29th 18, 09:25 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Fatal Truth in Fundamental Physics

Einsteinians know that the speed of light is VARIABLE but... the truth is fatal:

"The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light...So we had to find ways to change the speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much" https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/a...t-speed-slowed

"Thus a constant speed of light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels." http://www.thegreatdebate.org.uk/VSLRevPrnt.html

The speed of light is OBVIOUSLY variable:

Stationary light source; moving receiver: http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ector_blue.gif

Frequency measured by the source: f; by the moving receiver: f' f.

Speed of pulses relative to the source: c = df (d is distance between pulses).

Speed of pulses relative to the moving receiver:

c' = df' c

in violation of Einstein's relativity.

Any relevant experiment, if correctly interpreted, shows that the speed of light is VARIABLE:

John Norton: "The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an emission theory of light that CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE." http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf

Pentcho Valev
  #2  
Old April 30th 18, 10:13 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Fatal Truth in Fundamental Physics

Whether Einstein's 1905 light postulate is true or false depends on whether light pulses bunch up in front of the moving source or not:

http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ler_static.gif

http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ource_blue.gif

Light pulses don't bunch up - bunching up obviously violates the principle of relativity. Rather, the speed of light VARIES with the speed of the source, as posited by Newton's emission theory:

"Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelson–Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c ± v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fundamental Physics Reconciles 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 February 17th 18 09:04 AM
Variable Speed of Light: Fatal to Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 January 30th 18 12:14 PM
Absolute Truth in Fundamental Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 January 30th 18 11:53 AM
How Fundamental Physics Became an Ideology Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 January 6th 18 12:11 PM
Physics is fundamental wrong Sarah Schwartz Astronomy Misc 134 June 27th 04 02:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.