|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
UK balloon visible at long range?
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 18:20:00 +0000 (UTC), mike ring
wrote: "I would like to see it, but surely 25 miles up is no great height, an elevation of 30% would surely only give a visible track of about 100 miles." but made no impression; Im a long way from being expert, so perhaps someone will comment on likely visibility Your figures are correct, but the reports I read was it is the size of the Empire State building, which should greatly increase the chances of it being seen. But its a moot point for another year, could have been interesting trying to see it though -- --- The two most abundant elements in the universe are Hydrogen and stupidity. Why is the ratio of Hydrogen to Stupidity less in usenet than anywhere else in the universe? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Popping The Big Bang | Jim Greenfield | Astronomy Misc | 701 | July 8th 07 05:40 PM |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
At which altitudes do visible satellites orbit? | Ed Cannon | Satellites | 11 | January 24th 04 01:07 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ v4 | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 4th 03 11:52 PM |
It's been a long road ... | Jon Berndt | Space Shuttle | 60 | September 22nd 03 05:44 AM |